Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Stepping down as a maintainer

me you have contributed, and all the work you contributed. So long, and thanks for all the fish! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 14.0

n should be considered experimental for this release 1. This contradicts the above quote. 2. If it's experimental, why is it enabled by default? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] gitlab: Add support for GitLab CI

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:36 PM Arun Raghavan wrote: > This adds a Dockerfile to generate a Docker image with the required > dependencies on top of the standard Ubuntu 18.04 image. The Gitlab CI > then runs the PulseAudio build within this image. > --- > .gitlab-ci.yml | 19

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [paprefs] [PATCH] Port to meson

d install > > to compile and install the package. > The .desktop file changes would break the autotools build, wouldn't it?. If a port to meson is desired (I'm not a maintainer, although this gets a +1 from me), then either a workaround should be found, or autotools be dropped at the same ti

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] udev-detect: warn when a sound card is busy

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 2:19 PM Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > Having a warning in the syslog should make it a bit easier to debug > situations where some other program is hogging the sound card. > +1. Just the other day someone on IRC had this problem and debug logs were needed. > --- >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 12.0

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > May I have your attention, please? > > PulseAudio 12.0 has entered our world, and it claims to be superior to > its predecessors at least in the following ways: > \o/ I have uploaded to debian unstable, and activated the gsettings module.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 11.99.1 (a.k.a. v12.0 release candidate 1)

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:14 AM Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 3:10 AM Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The first release candidate for PulseAudio 12.0 is now available! As >&

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 11.99.1 (a.k.a. v12.0 release candidate 1)

in lockstep, so I need to add strict version dependencies. Knowing the version number in advance allows me to set version restrictions before upgrading paprefs itself, and it allows preparing a paprefs git snapshot that matches the requirement. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 04/12] gsettings: add the modules schema to the schema description file

ede gconf? Ie, offer the gconf module only when gsettings will not be built. I can't think of a usecase for having both enabled at the same time... -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] module-gsettings: new module to store configuration using gsettings

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> >> Note that the alternative to this less-than-perfect upgrade process is >> not gl

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 4/4] bluetooth: Rename *bluez5 modules to bluetooth

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz < luiz.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz > > Since there is no longer support for BlueZ 4 it makes no sense to keep > BlueZ 5 modules separated. > > AFAICT, this would render invalid many

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Remaining PA process after X logout

r-user (by masking the relevant unit on a system path). 5. Proper autorestart policy configuration -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] set exit-idle-time to 0 when we detect a session

2 ++ > 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+) The daemon.conf manpage should be updated to indicate that this parameter is ignored if one of the session modules is loaded. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > As the comments e

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: don't install esdcompat tool if building without esound support

--- configure.ac| 8 ++-- man/Makefile.am | 9 +++-- src/Makefile.am | 6 +- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 013918f1a..2a820b91d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1503,7 +1503,6 @@

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] webrtc compile problem

/per/tmp/test/webrtc-audio-processing-0.3 > > You might need to modify configure.ac to add support for FreeBSD (look at the > sections that define HAVE_POSIX). > There is a patch here that might help you get started. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829570 The submitter has unfortunately not tried to upstream it yet. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Port from GTK2 to GTK3

Switch from libglade to GtkBuilder, as that is the new preferred interface. --- configure.ac | 2 +- src/paprefs.cc| 7 +- src/paprefs.glade | 224 ++ 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] module-gsettings: new module to store configuration using gsettings

Hi, On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Note that the alternative to this less-than-perfect upgrade process is > not glitchless status quo. It is my understanding[2] that gconf will > eventually be forcefully removed from ma

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: First pass at a meson-ified build system

easily be documented. > > So while this proposal flies in the face of how we've always done > things, I think the fallout can easily be mitigated with documentation, > and the long-term wins have merit. I would tend to agree. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: First pass at a meson-ified build system

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Arun Raghavan <a...@arunraghavan.net> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, at 10:58 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Arun Raghavan <a...@arunraghavan.net> >> wrote: >> > + >> > +apiversion =

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: First pass at a meson-ified build system

e-win32.c', > +#'thread-win32.c', > + > +libpulsecore = shared_library('pulsecore-' + pa_version_major_minor, > + libpulsecore_sources, > + libpulsecore_headers, > + include_directories : [configinc, topinc], > + c_args : [pa_c_args, server_c_args], > + instal

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: test for cxx-11 after AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS

This avoids the following autoconf warning: configure.ac:89: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:368: AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS is expanded from... configure.ac:89: the top level --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 11.1

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > Hi all, > > The 11.0 release had some nasty regressions, so we decided to make a > bug fix release. Thanks, I have just uploaded to debian. -- Salud

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] AppArmor profile for pulseaudio

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 21:16 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> I have been told downstream[1] that there is an AppArmor profile that >> is worked on by people from Debian, Ubuntu and OpenSUSE. I have bee

[pulseaudio-discuss] AppArmor profile for pulseaudio

] https://bugs.debian.org/857798 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] launch: avoid autostarting pulseaudio systemd units for root

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 19:55 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > The autospawn mechanism already had a root-autospawn protection > mechanism. When > > using systemd that was lost. Systemd 234 has a mecha

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] launch: avoid autostarting pulseaudio systemd units for root

The autospawn mechanism already had a root-autospawn protection mechanism. When using systemd that was lost. Systemd 234 has a mechanism to conditionalize unit starting on the running user, so lets do that to protect against root autospawning. --- src/daemon/systemd/user/pulseaudio.service.in |

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 11.0

shortly. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] alsa-mixer: recognize the "Speaker Jack" control

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 10:26 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> I don't know enough to review this patch, but I notice an inconsistency. >> >> On Sep 2, 2017 09:39, "Tanu Kaskinen" <ta...@ik

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 10.99.1 (a.k.a. v11.0 release candidate 1)

Hi, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > Hi all, > > The first release candidate for PulseAudio 11.0 is now available! As > always, the purpose of the release candidate is to get some testing > done before the final version is released. So, everybody is

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] pulseaudio seg faults when switching to bluetooth sink on RPi3

On Mar 19, 2017 09:07, "John Frankish" wrote: Using pulseaudio-9.0 and bluez-5.43 and the RPi3 built-in bluetooth After starting the bluetooth daemon, pairing with bluetooth headphones and setting them as an a2dp sink, attempting to switch the audio stream to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New reviewer: Georg Chini

oblems with > keeping up with the incoming patches. \o/ This is great news! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] systemd: disable socket activation for root

On 8 February 2017 at 09:36, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 10:17 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 3 February 2017 at 05:51, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> > We disallow autospawning for root, but when using systemd socket >&

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] systemd: disable socket activation for root

ivation. This patch disables the socket activation for root. > > Thanks to Felipe Sateler for coming up with the idea of using > ConditionPathIsReadWrite=!/run. I'm sorry but I'll have to take this back. This check only checks if the path is mounted read-write, not if the calling process

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] How to avoid socket activation for root?

On 31 January 2017 at 10:45, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 10:17 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 28 January 2017 at 11:24, Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 04:00:31PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwis

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] How to avoid socket activation for root?

gt; Any better solution? >> > > Below also works, and is much better than the above: > > # /etc/systemd/user/pulseaudio.socket.d/override.conf > [Unit] > ConditionCapability=!CAP_SYS_ADMIN One could presumably run a system without SYS_ADMIN capabilities (eg, a container). Therefore, I think it is best to test for a root-owned file: [Unit] ConditionPathIsReadWrite=!/root -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 10.0

tch within 10 days. Just in time, as the freeze is on February 5th :) -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Test failure on musl libc and slower builders (thread-test timeout)

On Jan 17, 2017 00:09, "A. Wilcox" wrote: The second failure is that after I resolved the above issue (even just calling srand with '2' to avoid spinning too long), our PowerPC builder - a dual 1.8GHz 970fx - timed out. Running it outside of 'make check' allows me to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] First draft of 10.0 release notes completed

ould be great. Thanks! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] First draft of 10.0 release notes completed

eaudio.socket is always started first -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 9.99.1 (a.k.a. v10.0 release candidate 1)

g/status/package.php?p=pulseaudio=experimental -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] remove module-xenpv-sink

disabled in both distros. Therefore no complaints from our side. Fedora also appears to have this disabled[1]. [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/pulseaudio/9.0/1.fc25/data/logs/x86_64/build.log -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseau

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Add env vars for PA_ALSA_PATHS_DIR and PA_ALSA_PROFILE_SETS_DIR

--datadir be specified at configure time? I don't know much about snap, but I hope apps can expect some sort of filesystem layout... So, I think it is worth considering if adding a configure option (if one is missing) instead of runtime detection might be better. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] padsp: allow overriding library install location

The current build script hardcodes the $pkglibdir in the padsp command. This works and is a reasonable default. However, distributions that know where they install, can override this path and thus make padsp work for any architecture that has the library installed by using the following configure

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 2/2] raop: add error handling to rsa_encrypt()

"); > +pa_rtsp_disconnect(rtsp); > +/* FIXME: This is an unrecoverable failure. We should notify > + * the pa_raop_client owner so that it could shut itself > + * down. */ > +return; > +} > + &

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 1/2] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

RSA_public_encrypt(len, text, res, rsa, RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING); > RSA_free(rsa); > -- > 2.10.1 > > ___ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to >> plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question w

[pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

. How are things looking to have at least an RC during this year? I suppose shipping stretch with pa 10.0~rcN + some cherry-picked fixes (if required) is not that crazy. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

hat it is bad that the assertion will fail. This new method does not fail the assert, even when it couldn't correctly set the key. This code was buggy before this change, so maybe this code could go as-is and fix this later (either by adding checks, or requiring a new-enough openssl

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

exponent, size, NULL); > +pa_assert(RSA_set0_key(rsa, n_bn, e_bn, NULL) == 1); Shouldn't this be pa_assert_se? > > size = RSA_public_encrypt(len, text, res, rsa, RSA_PKCS1_OAEP_PADDING); > RSA_free(rsa); -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Make pulseaudio the default alsa device

On 21 October 2016 at 10:22, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 09:59 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On 18 October 2016 at 06:50, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > If the system is configured to use pulseaudio, then I wou

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Make pulseaudio the default alsa device

On 18 October 2016 at 06:50, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 14:49 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 14 October 2016 at 13:12, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> > On 14 October 2016 at 12:13, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@i

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Make pulseaudio the default alsa device (Was: LADSPA Per Channel\Audio Woes)

On 14 October 2016 at 13:12, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > On 14 October 2016 at 12:13, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:48 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On 14 October 2016 at 11:44, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi>

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Make pulseaudio the default alsa device (Was: LADSPA Per Channel\Audio Woes)

On 14 October 2016 at 12:13, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:48 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 14 October 2016 at 11:44, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> > The stock configuration of Ubuntu will set >> > pu

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Service File for running in system mode

; > 0a95f82340cb4818a15b1fabc2ca2001-card-database.tdb > 0a95f82340cb4818a15b1fabc2ca2001-default-sink > 0a95f82340cb4818a15b1fabc2ca2001-default-source > 0a95f82340cb4818a15b1fabc2ca2001-device-volumes.tdb > 0a95f82340cb4818a15b1fabc2ca2001-stream-volumes.tdb > > Any more ideas? No,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] module-gsettings: new module to store configuration using gsettings

On 6 October 2016 at 08:28, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 12:14 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 5 October 2016 at 05:17, Sylvain Baubeau <leba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> &g

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Service File for running in system mode

On 5 October 2016 at 13:44, Florian Lindner <mailingli...@xgm.de> wrote: > Hey, > > thanks for your input! > > Am 04.10.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Felipe Sateler: >> On 4 October 2016 at 14:42, Florian Lindner <mailingli...@xgm.de> wrote: >>> Hey, &g

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] module-gsettings: new module to store configuration using gsettings

On 5 October 2016 at 05:17, Sylvain Baubeau <leba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-10-04 13:04 GMT+02:00 Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi>: >> >> On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 23:21 +0200, Sylvain Baubeau wrote: >> > 2016-09-27 21:32 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <f

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Service File for running in system mode

> > [Service] > Type=notify > ExecStart=/usr/bin/pulseaudio --daemonize=no --system --realtime > --disallow-module-loading --disallow-exit --log-target=journal > > [Install] > WantedBy=sound.target I think it may be a good idea to also enable the socket act

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] module-gsettings: new module to store configuration using gsettings

omatically after an upgrade, and thus gsettings module might not be loaded. But, I hope paprefs can already deal with such a scenario and prompt the user accordingly. In debian there is only paprefs depending on module-gconf. I don't think we'll keep module-gconf afte

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] build-sys: bump minor gettext version to 0.18.2

This avoids a warning in the intl.m4 macro: configure.ac:106: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is deprecated, and its use is discouraged. configure.ac:106: You should use the Autoconf-provided 'AC_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro instead, configure.ac:106: and use '' instead of ''in your Makefile.am

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] build-sys: use AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXCEPTIONS before trying to compile anything

This silences a warning: configure.ac:89: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 1bcdda6..db5b3dc 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] 98766: Bug and bounty to improve HDMI handling in PA

property, or seat0 as fallback). [1] https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/logind/ -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/5] Fix the conflict between bluetooth-policy and card-restore

ian, Fedora and Gentoo (I may be wrong though). As all of these distros have moved to bluez 5, I think it is kind of inevitable that bluez 4 code will bitrot. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] bluetooth: When doing autoswitch call pa_card_set_profile with save=true

of the things I miss from KDE is its capability to restore streams back to HDMI when the cable is plugged, or when a bluetooth speaker becomes available. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freede

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] launch: make pulseaudio.service properly order and require the socket

This commit fixes two problems: 1. Because there are no implicit dependencies between sockets and services, the socket, as set up by systemd will race with the socket, as set up by the pulseaudio daemon. This can cause the pulseaudio.socket unit to fail (even though the pulseaudio

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] webrtc: build failures on i386

On 27 May 2016 at 00:04, Arun Raghavan <a...@arunraghavan.net> wrote: > Hey Felipe, > > On Thu, 26 May 2016, at 07:03 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Turns out webrtc 0.2 does not work on most debian archs[1]. One part >> is big-endian arches

[pulseaudio-discuss] webrtc: build failures on i386

for conditinal loading (although I'd prefer not to do that). What would be the best course of action? [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=webrtc-audio-processing=experimental [2] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95738 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 9.0 RC1

On 12 May 2016 at 08:15, Arun Raghavan <a...@arunraghavan.net> wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm pleased to announce that the first release candidate for PulseAudio > 9.0 is out. I have just uploaded an update to debian experimental. Please test! -- Saludos,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] WebRTC AudioProcessing v0.2 release

On 11 May 2016 05:49, "Georg Chini" <ge...@chini.tk> wrote: > > On 28.04.2016 01:46, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On 27 April 2016 at 09:56, Arun Raghavan <a...@accosted.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> I'm happy to finally an

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] WebRTC AudioProcessing v0.2 release

y for the pulseaudio 9 release. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4 1/2] client audio: Support memfd transport

On 26 April 2016 at 09:35, Arun Raghavan <a...@accosted.net> wrote: > On 26 April 2016 at 18:02, Arun Raghavan <a...@accosted.net> wrote: >> On 26 April 2016 at 17:58, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 26 April 2016 at 03:29, Tanu Kaskinen <t

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4 1/2] client audio: Support memfd transport

thub.com/json-c/json-c/blob/master/ChangeLog#L26 -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Stepping down; future thoughts

On 28 March 2016 at 01:36, David Henningsson <di...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > I've decided to stop working for Canonical, and with that, I intend to ramp > down my contributions to PulseAudio, on both upstream and Ubuntu levels. Good luck in your next projects! -- Saludos, Fe

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 0/8] Add GStreamer-based RTP support

ns to add other gstreamer deps it wouldn't... Also, it took me a while to realize there is apparantly no circular dependency: plugins-good comes in a separate source package from the gstreamer parts required by pulseaudio, thus avoiding the circularity. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler __

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Using module-combine-sink with intermittent devices

On 19 Jan 2016 18:53, "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:47:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > > > On 18 January 2016 at 23:25, Arun Raghavan <a...@accosted.net> wrote: > > > > > This shou

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 8.0 RC2

ere are Fedora RPMs up at: > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/arunsr/pulseaudio-latest/ > I have also just uploaded the package to debian experimental. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 8.0 RC1

ebian experimental, if you want to try it out but don't want to compile it! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 3/6] stream: Implement a pa_stream_get_volume() API

l SHM ringbuffer channel. > Acked by client by sending PA_COMMAND_DISABLE_SRBCHANNEL back. > > +## v31, implemented by >= 8.0 This says 8.0, but other patches say "\since 9.0". -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] build-sys: Fix install order of libpulsecore

On 28 December 2015 at 21:41, Arun Raghavan <a...@accosted.net> wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 05:33, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> On 28 December 2015 at 20:34, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >>> It needs to be installed after li

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] travis: Run make install in travis.

This helps detect ordering problems in the install target --- .travis.yml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 456cfb5..da3b352 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ before_script: - NOCONFIGURE=1

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] build-sys: Fix install order of libpulsecore

On 28 December 2015 at 20:34, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > It needs to be installed after libpulse, because of libtool relinking. Sorry for not noticing earlier. This is fallout from my earlier patch to install libpulsecore into pkglibdir. When building on a system

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: Make pulsecore a private library

It is not meant to be used by third parties, so do not install in a public dir --- src/Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) This is a resend, earlier patch was not picked up by patchwork. diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am index de975c5..f1bd38d 100644

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/2] conf-parser: add support for .d directories

On 6 December 2015 at 20:51, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 19:50 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 12:24 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> > On 4 December 2015 at 09:46, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> &

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/2] conf-parser: add support for .d directories

On 4 December 2015 at 09:46, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 09:29 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 4 December 2015 at 02:58, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> > + * If use_dot_d is true, then before parsing the file named by the &

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/2] conf-parser: add support for .d directories

line. This would allow (in the future) to extend the search path to /usr/share/pulseaudio, and ship the defaults (uncommented) there. Then local configuration can be done via dropin files. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pu

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 08/11] echo-cancel: Mark private function as static

id pa_webrtc_ec_fixate_spec(pa_sample_spec *rec_ss, pa_channel_map > *rec_map, > + pa_sample_spec *play_ss, pa_channel_map > *play_map, > + pa_sample_spec *out_ss, pa_channel_map > *out_map) I

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] webrtc-audio-processing API breakage

be incompatible) against both versions of the library (by using an appropriate subset)? Or would pulseaudio have to require the new version? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Device reservation improvement suggestions

On 20 October 2015 at 03:46, David Henningsson <david.hennings...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 2015-10-19 14:27, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On 19 October 2015 at 05:41, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> >>>> (Side note:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Device reservation improvement suggestions

er instead of session bus, the benefits of moving to the system bus are reduced. Also, who would ship the dbus/polkit policy to allow logged in users to own the name? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freed

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio daemon initialization perjury

On 8 October 2015 at 11:22, Glenn Golden <g...@zplane.com> wrote: > Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> [2015-10-08 09:45:51 -0300]: >> On 8 October 2015 at 06:28, Glenn Golden <g...@zplane.com> wrote: >> > Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> [2015-10-08 11:33

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] build-sys: Make pulsecore a private library

It is not meant to be used by third parties, so do not install in a public dir --- src/Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am index 0c58d37..838560d 100644 --- a/src/Makefile.am +++ b/src/Makefile.am @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Dynamic range compression

"Threshold level (dB)" input, control, -30 to 0, default 0 "Ratio (1:n)" input, control, 1 to 20, default 1 "Knee radius (dB)" input, control, 1 to 10, default 3.25 "Makeup gain (dB)" input, control, 0 to 24, default 0 &quo

[pulseaudio-discuss] coverity and pa_asser_se

result1234 = expr1234 ; if (!(result1234)) __coverity_panic__(); } while (0) -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Ready for 7.0?

one crasher fix since [2], but if user reports have been > relatively stable, then we might be able to do 7.0 in a couple of > days. I have not received any reports in debian, but then not many people use experimental. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ p

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Enabling automatic coverity scans for pulseaudio via travis

> void pa_assert_se(int x) { > if (!x) > __coverity_panic__(); > } > > it seems to ignore the hint for pa_assert_se() (or it is wrong) My guess is that the model is not getting picked up because pa_asser_se is a macro that expands a lot like

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] pa_get_fqdn: always free addrinfo

On 11 September 2015 at 10:45, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > On 11 September 2015 at 08:20, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:42 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> Found by coverity >>> --- >>> s

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] pa_get_fqdn: always free addrinfo

Also fix the return error code check of getaddrinfo call Coverity ID: 1323587 --- src/pulse/util.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/pulse/util.c b/src/pulse/util.c index 305673f..54fe7a2 100644 --- a/src/pulse/util.c +++ b/src/pulse/util.c @@

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] pa_*_volume_change_push: Do not dereference freed memory when freeing the next events

Coverity IDs: 1138197, 1138196 --- src/pulsecore/sink.c | 3 ++- src/pulsecore/source.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink.c b/src/pulsecore/sink.c index c2bf0e4..9ddb527 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/sink.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/sink.c @@

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] pa_get_fqdn: always free addrinfo

On 11 September 2015 at 08:20, Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:42 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Found by coverity >> --- >> src/pulse/util.c | 5 - >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> dif

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 3/3] pa_*_volume_change_push: Do not dereference freed memory when freeing the next events

On 11 September 2015 at 08:18, David Henningsson <david.hennings...@canonical.com> wrote: > Ack, but would it not be more elegant to use PA_LLIST_FOREACH_SAFE? OK, will change it to use that. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pulseaudio-discus

  1   2   3   >