On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 10:48 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > After some discussion in IRC, it looks like something like this might be
> > acceptable to everyone (well, the involved parties have been just Mikel,
> > David and me):
> >
> > Keep por
Hi Tanu,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
>> > On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
>> > > We decided Immediately before 3.0 that some Bluetooth ports
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:46 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> > On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> > > We decided Immediately before 3.0 that some Bluetooth ports should be
> > > merged (commit 40329acc1a28145643e49207e9d65cd05bbda
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 14:57 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> Hi Tanu,
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 08:44 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> >> On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> > If the phone uses PulseAudio path configuration files
On 02/06/2013 12:48 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 08:44 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
If the phone uses PulseAudio path configuration files for the ALSA
configuration, the Bluetooth port could be flagged with a property. If
the pho
Hi Tanu,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 08:44 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
>> On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>> > If the phone uses PulseAudio path configuration files for the ALSA
>> > configuration, the Bluetooth port could be flag
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 08:44 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > If the phone uses PulseAudio path configuration files for the ALSA
> > configuration, the Bluetooth port could be flagged with a property. If
> > the phone uses UCM, I think the UCM config
Hi David,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:44 AM, David Henningsson
wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:30 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2013 04:07 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:50 +0100, David Henningsson w
On 02/04/2013 05:06 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:30 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 04:07 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:50 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
If A2DP and HSP audio go through different sound cards, we have no
possibility to me
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:30 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 04:07 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:50 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> >> If A2DP and HSP audio go through different sound cards, we have no
> >> possibility to merge them right now.
> >>
> >> Not
On 02/04/2013 04:07 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:50 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 03:44 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
I don't think merging ports with sinks/sources is the most relevant
question here. The question is how to simultaneously present a Bluetooth
head
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:50 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 03:44 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >>> I don't think merging ports with sinks/sources is the most relevant
> >>> question here. The question is how to simultaneously present a Bluetooth
> >>> headset as a single routing endpo
On 02/04/2013 03:44 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:05 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 02:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
So; if port are merged with sinks/sources, I assume you would like this
merged objec
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 15:05 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 02:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> >> So; if port are merged with sinks/sources, I assume you would like this
> >> merged object to be once per stream (i e diffe
On 02/04/2013 02:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
Yes, I've held the opinion for quite some time now that sinks/sources
should be merged with
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 10:43 +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >> Yes, I've held the opinion for quite some time now that sinks/sources
> >> should be merged with ports. It's a big change and does
On 02/04/2013 09:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
Yes, I've held the opinion for quite some time now that sinks/sources
should be merged with ports. It's a big change and doesn't bring any new
features in itself, so I don't consider it as a high-pr
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:42 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:25 +0200, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>> > Hi David,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, David Henningsson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 11/27/2012 02
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 09:31 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> >>>
> I've changed my mind about the last point. Ports are not really that
> close to the ideal "routing endpoint" concept. For example, on cellular
> phones, pulseaud
Hi Tanu,
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Henningsson
wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 05:07 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 22:33 +0200, Janos Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>>
I've changed my mind about the last poi
On 12/04/2012 05:07 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 22:33 +0200, Janos Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
I've changed my mind about the last point. Ports are not really that
close to the ideal "routing endpoint" concept. For example, on ce
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 22:33 +0200, Janos Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>
> > I've changed my mind about the last point. Ports are not really that
> > close to the ideal "routing endpoint" concept. For example, on cellular
> > phones, pulseaudio may
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> I've changed my mind about the last point. Ports are not really that
> close to the ideal "routing endpoint" concept. For example, on cellular
> phones, pulseaudio may not have access to the actual audio data to and
> from the cellular
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 18:32 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> From: Mikel Astiz
>
> This patchset extends the previous patch (resent unmodified here) with
> the policy change suggested by Tanu.
>
> It seems no conclusion was reached about the names etc. but I believe
> this is the best alternative wit
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:42 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:25 +0200, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, David Henningsson
> > wrote:
> > > On 11/27/2012 02:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Mikel,
> > >
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 16:25 +0200, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, David Henningsson
> wrote:
> > On 11/27/2012 02:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Mikel,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mikel Astiz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >
On 11/28/2012 03:25 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi David,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, David Henningsson
wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi Mikel,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mikel Astiz
wrote:
Hi Luiz,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Luiz A
Hi David,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:14 PM, David Henningsson
wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 02:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mikel,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mikel Astiz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Luiz,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
>>> wrote:
>
On 11/27/2012 02:35 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi Mikel,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
Hi Luiz,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
wrote:
Hi Mikel,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
From: Mikel Astiz
This patchset exte
Hi Mikel,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> wrote:
>> Hi Mikel,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mikel Astiz
>> wrote:
>>> From: Mikel Astiz
>>>
>>> This patchset extends the previous patch (resen
Hi Luiz,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
wrote:
> Hi Mikel,
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mikel Astiz
> wrote:
>> From: Mikel Astiz
>>
>> This patchset extends the previous patch (resent unmodified here) with the
>> policy change suggested by Tanu.
>>
>> It seem
Hi Mikel,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
> From: Mikel Astiz
>
> This patchset extends the previous patch (resent unmodified here) with the
> policy change suggested by Tanu.
>
> It seems no conclusion was reached about the names etc. but I believe this is
> the best alter
From: Mikel Astiz
This patchset extends the previous patch (resent unmodified here) with the
policy change suggested by Tanu.
It seems no conclusion was reached about the names etc. but I believe this is
the best alternative without the form factor and in any case the strings can
easily be ch
33 matches
Mail list logo
