I'm more intrigued by the possibility of turning my dumpster bound PC
hardware into something useful using PulseAudio.
Work out the electricity and AC costs and you won't think they are so
cheap.
This node I working on right now is a 1.1Ghz Celeron laptop. Power
consumption is probably
Ok, a laptop breaks the old pc concept a little. It is definitely the
way to go. Its funny though, for me, 50 kw would cost a little over a
dollar. My new core 2 duo server only pulls 65 watts while on, the old
machine pulled 265! And to top it off my old machine had a power factor
of ~55,
I thought about this route, but the issue is I don't want interruptions
in the rooms already listening to music. Maybe if feed all four input
sources into split out sinks (splitting each input into 4 null-sink
outputs in the end), I could then attach the final sound card outputs on
demand
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Matt Patterson wrote:
I thought about this route, but the issue is I don't want interruptions
in the rooms already listening to music. Maybe if feed all four input
sources into split out sinks (splitting each input into 4 null-sink
outputs in the
On Thu, 14.02.08 20:10, Jim Duda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Here is the Asterisk alsa write code loop. I added the trap for -EIO.
I'm getting an negative return from snd_pcm_recover.
[Feb 14 20:08:25] ERROR[3085]: chan_alsa.c:404 alsa_write:
snd_pcm_recover failed Input/output error
Yeah, that would work. I wonder what the processing loads would be? I
assume that the sync has to be maintained on all outputs for all
streams, independent of muting state. It also may not scale should I
want to add more zones, but that's a while off. No better way to know
than to try it.
On Thu, 14.02.08 11:56, Colin Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Being in the thick of things at a distro adoption level, these are the
things I think that are important for pulse to be fully accepted.
1. Improvements to the pulse alsa plugin to make it more tolerant of
buggy alsa
On Thu, 14.02.08 22:23, Matthew Patterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Now for my question: This implementation obviously spews a lot of
multicast traffic onto my network. I didn't think this would be a
problem, but my router/ap/switch seems to crap out when it gets hammered
with all the
On Thu, 14.02.08 01:03, Colin Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Just tested and it seems to load fine a gnome login plays the sounds nicely.
If you want (and to save too much divergence if it's not needed), you
are welcome to just copy the one I have. It also does some small checks
Are there any plans to support rtp syncing in the future?
Thanks
Kevin
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 14:51 -0800, Matt Patterson wrote:
I tried setting the routing table to direct to other interfaces but
the packets keep appearing on the interface i didn't want. Each of the
4 rtp send modules goes to
10 matches
Mail list logo
