Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] pulseaudio-0.9.8/

2008-01-09 Thread Peter Onion
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 18:49 -0700, Karl Larsen wrote: Well I got the tarball of this version on my Fedora 8 operating system. It unpacked just fine and I got busy with ./configure but it errored out like this: I used the packages from Fedora 9 to upgrade my Fedora 8 machine to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Client setting for pa_buffer_attr for low latency

2008-01-13 Thread Peter Onion
. Peter Onion ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio fails on Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Peter Onion
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 14:34 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 09.03.09 01:48, Another Sillyname (anothersn...@googlemail.com) wrote: 2009/3/8 Peter Onion peter.on...@btinternet.com: Using pulseaudio-0.9.14-1.fc10 (x86_64) After a few minutes playing.. E: source.c

[pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Onion
Has anyone got some example code which uses the GLIB Main Loop Bindings ? I was trying to get some of my old computer emulation applications (*) working with PA about a year ago, but at the time I just side stepped pulse as I had a multi channel sound card so software mixing wasn't essential.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Onion
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:07 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 29.09.09 20:45, Peter Onion (peter.on...@btinternet.com) wrote: Has anyone got some example code which uses the GLIB Main Loop Bindings ? So I'm looking for an example of using pa with a gtk+ (libglade

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-09-29 Thread Peter Onion
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: If you write output applications it is not recommended to use the glib glue coe because you don't want to run the audio IO stuff in the same event loop as the slow X stuff. The glib glue code is only useful for control

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-09-30 Thread Peter Onion
I've been looking at the tests in the source distribution to get some more ideas on how things fit together. BUT, I still can't figure out how to use the threaded mainloop. There are some examples of using bits of it, but at the moment I can't see how to put them together in a coherent way.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-02 Thread Peter Onion
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 10:18 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: A very brief intro how to use the threaded mainloop you may find in the doxygen docs. In case you haven't had a look yet: http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/pulseaudio/doxygen/threaded_mainloop.html That was one of the first

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-02 Thread Peter Onion
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 18:30 +0100, Peter Onion wrote: Next thing is to try and control the sound with some glade widgets to see it the latency is going to be a problem doing things this way. Things are looking good :-) Latency is OK and only a very occasional dropout. It was ok when

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-04 Thread Peter Onion
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:40 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Peter Onion at 02/10/09 21:24 did gyre and gimble: It was ok when pulseaudio was using ~8% of one core but it seems to have jumped up to 20%, dropouts are happening every couple of seconds and these messages

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-04 Thread Peter Onion
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 01:17 +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote: Did you check all the output levels are unmuted for your card? Try running alsamixer from the commandline. FIxed. Output was being sent to the sound device on my Radeon graphics card (which I assume comes out the HDMI connector ?)

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-05 Thread Peter Onion
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 23:04 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sun, 04.10.09 15:44, Peter Onion (peter.on...@btinternet.com) wrote: So, what are the steps to upgrade my pulseaudio to the latest version ? I assume I can't just remove the pulseaudio rpm as that will break dependencies

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Example using async API

2009-10-14 Thread Peter Onion
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 00:24 +0100, Nix wrote: A shame. It's fine software, better than any other desktop sound system I've ever used, but it seems it's not safe to use unless I'm in the right club or have infinite amounts of free time to use to follow everything you do in micrometric

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Wanted: native English speakers for review: [PATCH 5/5] man: sync_volume parameters to manual page

2010-10-14 Thread PETER ONION
--- On Thu, 14/10/10, Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: The amount *of* usesc The number of usecs would be better. PeterO ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de