'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 06/04/11 07:39 did gyre and gimble:
>> While I appreciate this is a work around, is it worth committing
>> (especially to stable-queue) in the short term?
>>
>> We'll likely push out stable-queue very soon. If you've got a fairly
>> recent snapshot for Ubuntu
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:57 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:57:22AM EST, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > We'll likely push out stable-queue very soon. If you've got a fairly
> > recent snapshot for Ubuntu already, then bumping the version to 0.9.23
> > should be uncontroversial (t
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:57:22AM EST, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> We'll likely push out stable-queue very soon. If you've got a fairly
> recent snapshot for Ubuntu already, then bumping the version to 0.9.23
> should be uncontroversial (tho' version bumps may still be banned by
> policy regardless).
>
On 2011-04-05 22:57, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 05/04/11 13:03 did gyre and gimble:
As I discussed with Tanu Kaskinen yesterday, we should do something
about when one profile path prevents another from using the hw volume
capabilities. However, with Ubuntu a few
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 05/04/11 13:03 did gyre and gimble:
> As I discussed with Tanu Kaskinen yesterday, we should do something
> about when one profile path prevents another from using the hw volume
> capabilities. However, with Ubuntu a few weeks from release, I went for
> the w
As I discussed with Tanu Kaskinen yesterday, we should do something
about when one profile path prevents another from using the hw volume
capabilities. However, with Ubuntu a few weeks from release, I went for
the workaround approach and created a separate profile for the devices
instead to min
