[Puppet-dev] Core Pull Request Triage starts right now!

2016-03-01 Thread Hailee Kenney
Sorry for the late notice! Please feel free to join us for the weekly pull request triage: http://links.puppetlabs.com/pr-triage -- Hailee Kenney hai...@puppetlabs.com Software Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet

[Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Eric Sorenson
I've been thinking about a config file for Facter, which has historically not been run-time configurable. The two problems in front of me that seem applicable are: * Sometimes, certain facts are just plain bad to collect and users would like to prevent them from even being resolved (see

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Rob Nelson
On Tuesday, March 1, 2016, Matthew Gaspar wrote: > The only problem I sometimes encounter, which may be a usage issue on my > part, is when creating custom facts sometimes it'd be nice to just run > `facter my_custom_fact` to get the output. If there would be some way to >

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread R.I.Pienaar
> On 1 Mar 2016, at 19:52, Eric Sorenson wrote: > > I've been thinking about a config file for Facter, which has historically not > been run-time configurable. > > The two problems in front of me that seem applicable are: > > * Sometimes, certain facts are just

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matthew Gaspar wrote: > A config file for facter is intriguing to me. > > Would this solely be used to change behaviors when running facter, or do > you see some potential for defining some facts within the config itself? > I'd rather not mix

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Eric Sorenson
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Matthew Gaspar wrote: > > A config file for facter is intriguing to me. > > Would this solely be used to change behaviors when running facter, or do you > see some potential for defining some facts within the config itself? I think it'd be

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > On 1 Mar 2016, at 19:52, Eric Sorenson > wrote: > > I've been thinking about a config file for Facter, which has historically > not been run-time configurable. > > The two problems in front of

[Puppet-dev] Re: Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 01/03/16 19:52, Eric Sorenson wrote: I've been thinking about a config file for Facter, which has historically not been run-time configurable. The two problems in front of me that seem applicable are: * Sometimes, certain facts are just plain bad to collect and users would like to prevent

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread R.I.Pienaar
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 03:45, Kylo Ginsberg wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: >> >> >>> On 1 Mar 2016, at 19:52, Eric Sorenson wrote: >>> >>> I've been thinking about a config file for Facter,

Re: [Puppet-dev] Facter config file

2016-03-01 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Rob Nelson wrote: > On Tuesday, March 1, 2016, Matthew Gaspar wrote: > >> The only problem I sometimes encounter, which may be a usage issue on my >> part, is when creating custom facts sometimes it'd be nice to just run >>

Re: [Puppet-dev] metaparam question

2016-03-01 Thread Kylo Ginsberg
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:02 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > hello, > > Thanks for the replies, think I'll reply to both in one go > > - Original Message - > > From: "Luke Kanies" > > To: "puppet-dev" > > Sent: Friday, February