Hi Fraser,
On 02/04/15 19:56, Fraser Goffin wrote:
Here's a simple example that works for me :-
--snip--
Wonderful, thank you. Using your work plus
https://github.com/zipkid/puppet3-hiera_data_in_module/tree/master/modules/test,
I've got it working. I _think_ my only problem was that I was u
Here's a simple example that works for me :-
First you obviously have the ripienaar/module_data module installed and
available to your puppet apply (I'm using masterless puppet).
My folder structure :-
- puppet
| modules
|--- sonarqube
|-- data
|- hiera.yaml
|---
I've been trying to use the module_data module, but cannot get it to
bring in values. Is there a worked example somewhere, including site.pp
and hiera.yaml?
https://github.com/zipkid/puppet3-hiera_data_in_module hasn't helped - I
get the class defaults from init.pp, not the data from the yaml
Ok, I get it. First rule of data in modules: you don't talk about data in
modules.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@goog
I also would like to know if this is going to get mainlined.
It would be an excellent addition for overall module reuse.
Trevor
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Fabio Sangiovanni
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> is there any news about this topic?
> I think it would be great to know Puppetlabs' offi
Hi everybody,
is there any news about this topic?
I think it would be great to know Puppetlabs' official position on the
matter (if any), and the status of activities about it (issues on
tickets.puppetlabs.com don't say much).
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
- Original Message -
> From: "Alessandro Franceschi"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 10:40:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
> Wow, this looks promising: sane, plain and easy to
--- Original Message -
> > From: "R.I.Pienaar" >
> > To: puppet...@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:46:45 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
> >
> >
> >
> > -
- Original Message -
> From: "R.I.Pienaar"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:46:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jcboll
Hey,
Just to jump in at the end, (been following the thread) and looked at the
implementatino of data in modules, but found that the complexity
surrounding it was a bit much for people who were not experienced. Also,
troubleshooting issues with data, i.e. some form of outcome of a puppet run
- Original Message -
> From: "jcbollinger"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:13:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 21, 2013 8:14:59 PM UTC-5, Eric Sorens
On Monday, October 21, 2013 8:14:59 PM UTC-5, Eric Sorenson wrote:
>
> Another round of thanks for the replies to this thread. I apologize that
> almost as soon as I posted it, I got pulled off onto another project and
> wasn't able to follow up until now. Replies inline below, and there are
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Eric Sorenson"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 2:14:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
> Another round of thanks for the replies to this thread. I apologiz
Another round of thanks for the replies to this thread. I apologize that
almost as soon as I posted it, I got pulled off onto another project and
wasn't able to follow up until now. Replies inline below, and there are
probably a couple more coming to different branches (damn I miss Usenet
threa
- Original Message -
> From: "jcbollinger"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:23:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:35:00 AM UTC-5, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jcbollinger"
> > To: puppet...@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:08:10 PM
> > Subject: Re
cbollinger"
> > > > To: puppet...@googlegroups.com
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:08:10 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On T
- Original Message -
> From: "R.I.Pienaar"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11:14:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "
- Original Message -
> From: "Alessandro Franceschi"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 10:54:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 3:
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 3:35:00 PM UTC+2, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jcbollinger"
> > To: puppet...@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:08:10 PM
> > Subject: Re
On Friday, October 11, 2013 7:12:32 PM UTC-5, Chuck wrote:
>
> What would be nice but not necessary:
>
> 1) defined variable automatically have classname added to avoid global
> conflicts.
>
>
> eg.
>
> Module: apache
>
> variable: port
>
> becomes global hiera: apache::port
>
+1
Defining
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:08:10 AM UTC-5, jcbollinger wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm not saying that categorically getting rid of ::params classes is a
> viable target. In fact, I don't really understand why it was ever an
> objective in the first place. On the other hand, I don't see why it makes
I totally agree with R.I. on this.
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:35:00 AM UTC-5, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
> > To: puppet...@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:08:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Puppet
- Original Message -
> From: "jcbollinger"
> To: puppet-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:08:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Status of Data in modules
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:52:39 AM UTC-5, David Sc
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:52:39 AM UTC-5, David Schmitt wrote:
>
> On 14.10.2013 16:16, jcbollinger wrote:
> > So the proposed solution at this point is:
> > - enable an implicit data-binding lookup against the hiera-puppet
> > backend for a value of 'classname::variable' in
On 14.10.2013 16:16, jcbollinger wrote:
So the proposed solution at this point is:
- enable an implicit data-binding lookup against the hiera-puppet
backend for a value of 'classname::variable' in the file
'modules/classname/manifests/params.pp', which simplifies class
definit
On Friday, October 11, 2013 1:09:23 PM UTC-5, Eric Sorenson wrote:
>
>
> Thanks to everyone who kicked the tires on the experimental data in
> modules feature included in Puppet 3.3.0. We got a lot of feedback, some
> cool proof-of-concept modules, and a definitive conclusion to the
> experime
I see hiera data in modules just being a very useful extension of the
current hiera implementation.
Why
1) separate out the variables my dev teams use into the modules so that it
is easier to package their changes. Promoting their module includes all of
their heir data.
2) In an enterpr
I see the best aspect of data in modules is that it allows the clear
separation of variables per module in hiera. This is important because
module developers don't need access to a central global hiera that is
"static". For our use we need to break variables down by environment and
datacente
29 matches
Mail list logo
