On Feb 22, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Nobuchika Tanaka wrote:
err: Could not resolve 10.72.150.56: undefined method `include?' for
nil:NilClass
err: Could not resolve 10.72.150.56: undefined method `include?' for
nil:NilClass
info: Could not find certificate for 'sol10tst1'
err: Could not resolve
Comparing CPU utilisation is like benchmarking cars by seeing how well
they float.
Without wanting to appear flippant, perhaps I want a floating car :)
In my case I need a tool that *if* run during production hours will
consume very little CPU - we've got very stringent requirements for
Am Tuesday 23 February 2010 schrieb mir tobyriddell:
Comparing CPU utilisation is like benchmarking cars by seeing how
well they float.
Without wanting to appear flippant, perhaps I want a floating car :)
In my case I need a tool that *if* run during production hours will
consume very
Is 10.72.150.56 the client or the server?
10.72.150.56 is client and hostname is sol10tst1.
mise is server.
Also, what happ on each of them if you do an nslookup for 10.72.150.56?
Both of them can't connet server, because we are't using DNS.
mise# nslookup 10.72.150.56
;; connection timed
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Oliver Schad pup...@oschad.de wrote:
Do you know process priorities? It's very easy to run puppet with this.
Most CPUs has so much idle times that puppet is not a problem. The RAM
usage could be a more significant problem in smaller systems.
Using nice is
Hi,
Currently Foreman does not auto assign classes to your nodes (Except if you
are already using an external nodes and then you can import them via a rake
task).
the main issue here is that I didnt think its a good idea to import all of
the hosts classes (e.g. from storeconfig db) as a lot of
Hello
When testing puppet scalability, we noticed that one bottleneck is CPU usage on
puppetmaster node.
To scale up the number of concurrent puppet clients running in the same time, we tweaked our puppet configuration in
order to reduce puppetmaster work, mainly reducing its CPU work, and so
Hi David,
On 22/02/10 19:25, David Lutterkort wrote:
You can do this by looking for the entries with a single path
expression:
augtool match /files/etc/hosts/*[ipaddr = '127.0.1.1']
gives you all entries in /etc/hosts with that IP. To remove them, just
do 'rm' instead of 'match'.
Hi David,
Thanks for your reply, it cleared up some things!
On 22 feb, 20:35, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
You want to restrict when to make those changes with the onlyif
paramater, something like
augeas { ...:
context = ...
changes = ...
On 23 feb, 10:02, tobyriddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com wrote:
From the results in the article, Puppet required between 10x and 56x
more CPU seconds.
Out of curiosity, which part of puppet is causing this load? If it's
the puppetmaster, well then, that shouldn't be a big problem. I'd
recommend a
Got it !
% classes.each do |current_class| -%
% if has_variable?(current_class + ::iptable_rule_chain) then -%
%= scope.lookupvar(current_class + ::iptable_rule_chain) %
% end -%
% end -%
So easy ,all that time I was trying to use Bash style string
concatenation , which for some strange reason
Hi,
I'm new to puppet (doing an assesment of the puppet features
currently) and I believe many of you can tell me how to resolve these
questions I'm unable to find answers for. I have the Pulling Strings
with Puppet-book and have been crawling through the reductivelabs
puppet wiki-pages without
So, some of us would like to be able to set the nice value on puppetd.
However, we don't want all of our services (and some of our execs)
re-niced.
Would it be feasible/practical to have the ability to set the nice
value explicitly on Service and Exec calls?
Thanks,
Trevor
--
Trevor Vaughan
On a tangent, anybody using augeas under puppet to manage /etc/sudoers? ...
and how?
I was thinking about doing so to add/delete several commands to an
administrator group as part of setting up an apache/tomcat/whatever
instance, but cant figure out how to do it, for reasons similar to this
Out of curiosity, which part of puppet is causing this load? If it's
the puppetmaster, well then, that shouldn't be a big problem. I'd
recommend a dedicated puppetmaster in most setups anyway. Or when
puppet is actually applying a whole manifest instead of just checking
if things are set
Also, this doesn't seem to be CPU load, just time. It took puppet longer
to apply a manifest than CFengine, I'm assuming they made the same changes
on both systems and had both CFengine and puppet correct the same
differences. Wall clocks != higher load.
The difference was found to be in
On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Jesús Couto wrote:
On a tangent, anybody using augeas under puppet to manage /etc/sudoers? ...
and how?
I tried, but all I could get it to do was add the entries to the end of
`/etc/sudoers` over and over every 30 minutes. I gave up and made a define that
calls
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:57:37 -0800 (PST), Tim Stoop tim.st...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 feb, 10:02, tobyriddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com wrote:
From the results in the article, Puppet required between 10x and 56x
more CPU seconds.
Out of curiosity, which part of puppet is causing this load? If
The only explanation that I can find that explains the problems that I and a
few other user have been having is that 0.25.x adds a security feature that
makes it needed during the creation of client certificates. (Either that or
during the signing or retrieval of the certificates.) It could
On 23 February 2010 03:49, tobyriddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com wrote:
Comparing CPU utilisation is like benchmarking cars by seeing how well
they float.
Without wanting to appear flippant, perhaps I want a floating car :)
Then perhaps you should be looking for a boat?
Puppet's performance and
I'm not currently using external nodes, but I could switch over if the
functionality I'm looking for will work in that scenario... Either
way, I would love a way to query for hosts that have a particular
class, even if it's just an inherited class of some other class. That
would be a great way
Details on the event and registration can be found here:
http://reductivelabs.com/2010/02/23/announcing-puppetcamp-europe-2010-may-27-28-in-ghent-belgium/
Hope to see you there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this
Hi David,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:09 AM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 10:45 +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
MODULES_LOADED_ON_BOOT=module1 module2
My goal ist to have a type, which can append a module3 to this
entry, or replace the whole list, etc. (to stay
We are looking for great speakers for our Puppetcamp Europe event in
Ghent, Belgium. Get details on submitting your proposal here:
http://reductivelabs.com/2010/02/23/puppetcamp-europe-2010-call-for-submissions/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
James Cammarata wrote:
Also, this doesn't seem to be CPU load, just time. It took puppet longer
to apply a manifest than CFengine, I'm assuming they made the same changes
on both systems and had both CFengine and puppet correct the same
differences. Wall clocks != higher load.
In my opinion,
Just out of curiosity, do the ones that take longer happen to be 64 bit?
Also, does using --tags do what you want in terms of testing speed?
Trevor
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
James Cammarata wrote:
Also, this doesn't seem to be CPU load, just
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:58 PM, tobyriddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com wrote:
The result was either to add entries to /etc/hosts or to confirm the
contents of /etc/hosts.
I haven't read the article, but from this piece of information I'm
_highly_ skeptical of the results having much to do with
..or perhaps they used the native hosts type that exists to manage
/etc/hosts entries?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Jeff McCune mccune.j...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:58 PM, tobyriddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com
wrote:
The result was either to add entries to /etc/hosts or
Trevor Vaughan top-posted:
Just out of curiosity, do the ones that take longer happen to be 64 bit?
Well, yes, they are indeed 64 bit (x86_64). But that doesn't
distinguish them from the quicker ones. They are all running
CentOS 5.4 for x86_64, and they all have identical quad-core
Opteron
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
..or perhaps they used the native hosts type that exists to manage
/etc/hosts entries?
Dooh, thank you. I wish I could remove the previous email to prevent
my own misunderstanding from spreading. I should go read the
On Monday 22 February 2010 16:17:52 Toby Riddell wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
both verifying and fixing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/10 8:23 PM, Andrew Heagle wrote:
The version of CFEngine he is running is 3.0.1b3
(released ??? Jan or Feb '09, sometime, maybe?)
The version of Puppet he is running is 0.24.7
(released 16-Dec-2008)
It's also important to note the
I want to use a CNAME as a level of indirection
( to point N webservers at the active mySQL replica).
I'd like to use /etc/hosts to avoid the DNS propagation delays.
I don't want to do away with DNS altogether though - is it possible to lookup
a hostname and pass that IP to the hosts type?
Long shot question, but I'm running out of ideas...
I'm running puppet-0.25.2 on Fedora boxes to manage a simple Java
service started through an /etc/init.d script. I can start, stop,
restart, and examine the service status using the standard /sbin/
service command. Works like a champ.
The
Does anyone have an ideas, hints, or even vague notions of why
Puppet's service execution might be somehow different? I'm certainly
out of ideas to try.
One item you didn't mention in your list of things you've checked, so
I'll bring it up: Environment variables.
Don't know which ones
35 matches
Mail list logo
