On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:25:14 +0200
Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote:
Hi all,
I have installed a proxmox 4.0 to test openvswitch and IMHO the current
network GUI config is not suited for the task since every time you need
to create or delete an OVSint Port a reboot of the node is
: datanom.net m...@datanom.net
À: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Juillet 2015 19:46:23
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Network configuration
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:25:14 +0200
Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote:
Hi all,
I have installed a proxmox 4.0 to test openvswitch and IMHO
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
eval {
ovs-vsctl add-port $bridge vlan$port tag=$port -- set interface
vlan$port type=internal
};
internal interface can have a random name.
I know, but to keep it simple and IMHO more intuitive
not a problem to shutdown it.
- Mail original -
De: Martin Waschbüsch serv...@waschbuesch.it
À: datanom.net m...@datanom.net
Cc: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com, pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mardi 28 Juillet 2015 06:12:09
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Network configuration
Am
Am 27.07.2015 um 20:27 schrieb Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com wrote:
eval {
ovs-vsctl add-port $bridge vlan$port tag=$port -- set interface
vlan$port type=internal
};
internal interface can have a
Many feature are not implemented in OVS (multicast snooping/querier,
connection
tracking,
limited bond modes, iptables, ...), so why is OVS far superior?
I would prefer to have missing bits implemented with linux bridge code.
According to Alexandre's post much of this is coming
What is your opinion to this suggestion?
Can we implement that reliable?
Second. If the above is implemented then in my opinion using
openvswitch is far superior to Linux Bridge/Bond and gives greater
flexibility while at the same time is more logical and simple in use in
which case I
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:17:58 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Can we implement that reliable?
I am positive. I guess the same applies to Linux bridge based vlans. I
am willing to give it a try.
I still prefer linux bridge, because it works without additional
since kernel 3.10, it's possible to tag vlan by port on linux bridge too.
I had sent patches last year.
Maybe can I have a look with kernel 3.19,to see if it's still working fine ?
Yes, please. This would simplify our setup.
superior feature of ovs will be dpdk and vhost-user
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
really? i.e. can we use iptables with ovs?
In 2.4 something similar are implemented:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
Most standard linux bond modes are missing? And I
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:06:52 +0200
Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net wrote:
balance-slb ~≃ balance-tlb (mode 5)
active-backup = active-backup (mode 1)
balance-tcp ~= 802.3ad (mode 4)
What more modes do you miss?
Forgot to mention I have made an example available on the wiki using
bond
really? i.e. can we use iptables with ovs?
In 2.4 something similar are implemented:
http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/17/1030-conntrack_nat.pdf
That is just an interface to the conntrack module - not really related
to iptables? We need iptables for our firewall implementation.
, pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Juillet 2015 17:52:11
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Network configuration
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:17:58 +0200 (CEST)
Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
Can we implement that reliable?
I am positive. I guess the same applies to Linux
Forgot to mention I have made an example available on the wiki using
bond + balance-slb which imitates the default setup by the proxmox
installer:
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Open_vSwitch#Example_3:_Bond_.2B_Bridge_.2B_Internal_Ports_.2B_Untagged_traffic_.2B_No_LACP
Thanks.
: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com
À: datanom.net m...@datanom.net
Cc: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Juillet 2015 10:26:49
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] Network configuration
Hi all,
I have installed a proxmox 4.0 to test openvswitch and IMHO the current
network GUI config
that everybody will use a recent kernel, it
should work fine).
Having bonding and vlan setup in installer could be a big improvement too !
- Mail original -
De: datanom.net m...@datanom.net
À: pve-devel pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Juillet 2015 01:25:14
Objet: [pve-devel
在 2015年7月22日，下午4:26，Alexandre DERUMIER aderum...@odiso.com 写道：
Having bonding and vlan setup in installer could be a big improvement too !
this will be great! ___
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
from OVS to linux-bridge, and DRBD
worked out as expected.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Rasmussen m...@datanom.net
To: pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:25 PM
Subject: [pve-devel] Network configuration
Second. If the above is implemented then in my
Hi all,
I have installed a proxmox 4.0 to test openvswitch and IMHO the current
network GUI config is not suited for the task since every time you need
to create or delete an OVSint Port a reboot of the node is required. I
will therefore propose a change in the GUI which allows creating or
19 matches
Mail list logo
