Hi all,
I built a new Proxmox head with the latest release the other day and since then
I’m getting this cronjob error each day:
etc/cron.daily/pve:
parse error in '/etc/pve/datacenter.cfg' - 'console': property is not defined
in schema and the schema does not allow additional properties
Thanks for the hint, there is a NFS storage involved, I'll check that.
On 21/10/14 19:23, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
I have noticed that usually nodes stop on Unmounting configfs; but not
always.
Any hint about the reason? Anything to take into account when shutting down an
entire cluster instead
Hello,
This problem didn't show up since two weeks..
Last time it hanged, i captured a quick strace, and it seems there was a
timeout in a file descriptor.
Unfortunatly i killed the process faster than i thought to look in
/proc/pid/fd...so not sure if it helps.
root@proxmoxt2:~# strace -s
Hello,
Is there a known issue with pmxcfs crashing ?
Oct 19 04:33:58 proxmoxt1 kernel: [2705338.898341] pmxcfs[4003]:
segfault at 0 ip (null) sp 7f27c465c818 error 14 in
pmxcfs[40+25000]
Oct 19 04:34:18 proxmoxt1 rgmanager[2395]: status on pvevm 157
returned 2 (invalid
Never saw that. Is there a way to reprocude that?
Is there a known issue with pmxcfs crashing ?
Oct 19 04:33:58 proxmoxt1 kernel: [2705338.898341] pmxcfs[4003]:
segfault at 0 ip (null) sp 7f27c465c818 error 14 in
pmxcfs[40+25000]
Hi,
I got some problems with the Ciphers config that I found in the
.ssh/config installed in the root home (ie /root/.ssh/config).
I seems a Proxmox installed this file because I cannot find this file in
a standard Wheezy installation.
The problem is when connecting with some firewall
This is probably due to blowfish being faster than AES.
Proxmox uses ssh for migrations and other tasks, and since they (mostly)
performs in private networks, there is no need for strong encryption.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014, at 06:42 AM, Simone Piccardi wrote:
Hi,
I got some problems with the
Hi all,
don't know if this has been rised before.
I have created a KVM with a qcow2 file (32G per default)
Now if I look at the file on filesystem size is reported as 32GB, but at
a closer look it's a sparse file so with a system inside using only 5GB,
it's acqually using 5GB on the server
On 10/22/2014 10:33 AM, Alessandro Briosi wrote:
Hi all,
don't know if this has been rised before.
I have created a KVM with a qcow2 file (32G per default)
Now if I look at the file on filesystem size is reported as 32GB, but at
a closer look it's a sparse file so with a system inside using
On 10/22/2014 11:42 AM, Alessandro Briosi wrote:
As stated it's already a sparse file.
file size is 32GB but on the filesystem it uses only 5GB
Your definition of sparse and my definition of cruft are colliding here.
Sparse == hardly used filesystem.
cruft == non-zeroed, *unused* sectors on
Il 22/10/2014 18:45, Paul Gray ha scritto:
Your definition of sparse and my definition of cruft are colliding
here.
Sparse == hardly used filesystem.
cruft == non-zeroed, *unused* sectors on the disk
Your sparse filesystem likely has a lot of cruft. The two facets aren't
mutually exclusive.
On 10/02/2014 04:31 PM, Paul Gapes wrote:
Yes, A cluster is easy to deploy, but I think the comment was more
directed at the need for specific hardware fencing requirements. It
would be nice to just have the software take care of fencing, as
VMware does. Would this require the use of agents
I'm playing around with GlusterFS and have a few questions. Have got a test
setup running on a 2 node cluster (using external USB Drives!) that works
surprisingly well :) and I must say it was very easy to setup.
1. I wanted to implement a distributed/replicated file system. Is GlusterFS
the
For a 2 node setup, you cant reliably use glusterfs for master-master.
DRDB is designed for a 2node cluster
If you still want to use glusterfs, Create 2 sets of replicated slaves
with 6 brocks each. Each node has its own master and its slave is
replicated to the other server. This provides a
14 matches
Mail list logo
