On 2016-04-24 04:59 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On 25/04/2016 6:38 AM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
I have a VM stuck in start. It's not actually starting, and there
doesn't seem to be anything I can do to unstick it.
28128 ?Ds 0:00 task
On 25/04/2016 8:11 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
Just to check, since I don't have a key for the Enterprise
repositories, should I use the repositories from here ? :
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_repositories#Proxmox_VE_No-Subscription_Repository
Yes
--
Lindsay Mathieson
Apologies, wrong thread!
On 4/24/2016 6:11 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
Just to check, since I don't have a key for the Enterprise
repositories, should I use the repositories from here ? :
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_repositories#Proxmox_VE_No-Subscription_Repository
Thanks,
Laurent
Just to check, since I don't have a key for the Enterprise repositories,
should I use the repositories from here ? :
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_repositories#Proxmox_VE_No-Subscription_Repository
Thanks,
Laurent
On 4/24/2016 3:03 PM, Ralf wrote:
Some Western Digital Green stuff:
[
On 25/04/2016 6:38 AM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
I have a VM stuck in start. It's not actually starting, and there
doesn't seem to be anything I can do to unstick it.
28128 ?Ds 0:00 task
UPID:erl-proxmox-1:6DE0:0237B4E5:571D1C86:qmstart:111:root@pam:
How do I get this thing to
On 25/04/2016 6:38 AM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
I have a VM stuck in start. It's not actually starting, and there
doesn't seem to be anything I can do to unstick it.
28128 ?Ds 0:00 task
UPID:erl-proxmox-1:6DE0:0237B4E5:571D1C86:qmstart:111:root@pam:
How do I get this thing to
On 25/04/2016 5:03 AM, Ralf wrote:
Some Western Digital Green stuff:
There's a big part of your problem, never ever use WD greens in
servers, especially with ZFS. They are a desktop drive, not suitable for
24/7 operation. They have power saving modes which can't be disabled and
slow them
On 2016-04-24 03:38 PM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
Hi,
I have a VM stuck in start. It's not actually starting, and there
doesn't seem to be anything I can do to unstick it.
28128 ?Ds 0:00 task
UPID:erl-proxmox-1:6DE0:0237B4E5:571D1C86:qmstart:111:root@pam:
How do I get this
Hi,
I have a VM stuck in start. It's not actually starting, and there
doesn't seem to be anything I can do to unstick it.
28128 ?Ds 0:00 task
UPID:erl-proxmox-1:6DE0:0237B4E5:571D1C86:qmstart:111:root@pam:
How do I get this thing to start. I'm currently remote, so can't
Am 24. April 2016 19:51:21 MESZ, schrieb Ralf :
>Hi,
>
>zil.. That's an additional ZFS cache, right?
>Shouldn't it be slightly faster, even without additional caches?
The ZIL is used for writes. Not for reads.
That will not help with your slow reads.
It should
Hi,
zil.. That's an additional ZFS cache, right?
Shouldn't it be slightly faster, even without additional caches?
Ralf
On 04/24/2016 06:49 PM, Robert Fantini wrote:
> if those are not ssd drives, then adding a zil drive will most likely help.
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Ralf
Hi,
I think my SATA cables should be fine, as dumping from the raw block
device yields to 100MiB/s. I even tried offlining one disk and then
checked performance: Still bad.
But I don't get the point. If SATA cables were broken, how can I get
good performance on raw block devices? Nevertheless, I
Perhaps irrelevant, but a colleague of mine recently solved a puzzling
performance issue merely by replacing the existing SATA cables with new,
properly-rated cables.
Turns out, much like USB v1 vs USB v2, there's next to nothing distinguishing
SATA I cables vs SATA II cables vs SATA III
if those are not ssd drives, then adding a zil drive will most likely help.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Ralf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encounter very bad read/write performance on my mirror-zfs, even on
> hypervisor-side.
>
> After shutting down all VMs, reading
Hi,
On 24.04.2016 10:16, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
> On 24/04/2016 5:58 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I assume that the instructions from here :
>> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_3.x_to_4.0 are still valid?
>
>
> Good question, the latest ver is 4.1
>
> I'd presume they are
On 24/04/2016 5:58 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
Hi!
I assume that the instructions from here :
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_3.x_to_4.0 are still valid?
Good question, the latest ver is 4.1
I'd presume they are still ok but maybe the Proxmox guys can confirm?
--
Lindsay
Hi!
I assume that the instructions from here :
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_3.x_to_4.0 are still valid?
Thanks!
On 4/23/2016 6:13 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
On 24/04/2016 7:06 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
As anyone tried to update from 3.4 to 4.x without an enterprise repo?
We
17 matches
Mail list logo