Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 -> 5, multipath differences?

Hi, I see the same behaviour with an EMC VNXe3200 (two priorities). I assume it is the right thing to do, host really only has 2x1Gbit channels to storage... :) El 7/1/19 a las 10:37, Marco Gaiarin escribió: Mandi! Sten Aus In chel di` si favelave... As this is my third storage for not

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 -> 5, multipath differences?

Mandi! Sten Aus In chel di` si favelave... > As this is my third storage for not critical data, I don't worry much, but I > haven't checked if two paths (prio=50) get more load than other two (prio=10). Apart from the prio, the differences between jessie multipath is that in jessie all path

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 -> 5, multipath differences?

Hi I've encountered same "issue" or "feature", not sure. I've tried to edit/tweak multipath config, but "prio const" should say that every path is with same priority. As this is my third storage for not critical data, I don't worry much, but I haven't checked if two paths (prio=50) get more

[PVE-User] PVE 4 -> 5, multipath differences?

I've just upgraded my cluster frm 4.4 to latest 5. Before that, i've also do a firmware upgrade of the SAN (HP MSA 1040), but seems not related. In old PVE 4.4/jessie i got: dixie:~# multipath -ll mpath0 (3600c0ff00026ed11a7cb56570100) dm-1 HP,MSA 1040 SAN size=1.4T features='1

[PVE-User] pve 4 cluster status problem

hi, i have a problem with one of my clusters the problem is the following: even though i migrated all HA managed VMs of the node, for some reason one of the nodes got fenced upon applying updates. after the node cam back up i applied all updates and rebooted again. now i have the problem that

[PVE-User] PVE 4 migration status

Hi... This is not a bug... Consider this more a suggestion than some kind of error... But everytime I make an on-line migration, I get this message status Oct 14 09:10:54 migration status: active (transferred 16504607864, remaining 134885376), total 10754924544) Oct 14 09:10:54 migration xbzrle

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 HA

Ok, this seems like a bug. It's rather cosmetic as it hasn't any effect on the HA stack. I will write a patch. On 09/25/2015 05:11 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Nops... The server is down and I already remove it from corosync.conf and with command pvecm delnode proxmox03... 2015-09-25 11:38

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 HA

Hi, can you look into the syslog of your current master and see if there are messages like: detected unknown node state On 09/24/2015 09:33 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi Any idea how can I remove a delete node from HA?? It still appears when I run ha-manager status quorum OK master

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 HA

Nops... The server is down and I already remove it from corosync.conf and with command pvecm delnode proxmox03... 2015-09-25 11:38 GMT-03:00 Thomas Lamprecht : > Hi, can you look into the syslog of your current master and see if there > are messages like: > > detected

[PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

Hi guys I have a three nodes cluster with PVE 4 and HA enable. Just one VM with 8GB memory and 1,5 TB of hard disk. If the VM has 2 GB of memory and 32 GB of hard disk, HA works fine. But now, with more memory and hard disk, the HA freeze the VM: ha-manager status quorum OK master proxmox02

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

UPDATE I get this on syslog Sep 24 11:59:30 proxmox02 pve-ha-crm[1360]: service 'vm:120': state changed from 'started' to 'freeze' Sep 24 11:59:40 proxmox02 corosync[1304]: [TOTEM ] A new membership ( 10.1.1.20:224) was formed. Members left: 1 Sep 24 11:59:40 proxmox02 pmxcfs[1055]: [dcdb]

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

Oh, and after you added the votes, delete the PVE VM and delete it with the pvecm delnode oldvmnode-hostname from the cluster On 09/24/2015 05:08 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: Adapt the corosync.conf file in the /etc/pve folder there, set quorum_votes of one of the node entries from 1 to 2.

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

Adapt the corosync.conf file in the /etc/pve folder there, set quorum_votes of one of the node entries from 1 to 2. This achieves the same as your current setup but with much less overhead as no VM, which acts as PVE node, is needed. *NOTE*: for real HA three real nodes are needed. If you

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

> I get this on syslog > > Sep 24 11:59:30 proxmox02 pve-ha-crm[1360]: service 'vm:120': state changed > from 'started' to 'freeze' > Sep 24 11:59:40 proxmox02 corosync[1304]: [TOTEM ] A new membership ( > 10.1.1.20:224) was formed. Members left: 1 > Sep 24 11:59:40 proxmox02 pmxcfs[1055]:

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

It's work with 3 nodes, when I run pvecm expected 3!! 2015-09-24 12:08 GMT-03:00 Thomas Lamprecht : > Adapt the corosync.conf file in the /etc/pve folder there, set > quorum_votes of one of the node entries from 1 to 2. > > This achieves the same as your current setup

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

Of course! That what I expect since HA has 3 nodes. If NODE 1 go crash, NODE 2 was suppose to act... 2015-09-24 12:51 GMT-03:00 Dietmar Maurer : > > I get this on syslog > > > > Sep 24 11:59:30 proxmox02 pve-ha-crm[1360]: service 'vm:120': state > changed > > from 'started'

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

> Of course! That what I expect since HA has 3 nodes. If NODE 1 go crash, state 'freeze' means that node 1 was shutdown normally. So HA waits until that the node starts again. ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4 - VM Freeze

Nice shot Thomas! I need changes in quorum as well, adding two_node: 1 Now is work fine with two nodes.. Thanks a lot! 2015-09-24 12:09 GMT-03:00 Thomas Lamprecht : > Oh, and after you added the votes, delete the PVE VM and delete it with the > pvecm delnode

[PVE-User] PVE 4 and problem with drbdmanage

Hi all... I deploy two servers here, with PVE 4 and DRBD9. Same days ago, I was able to install and perform same live migration. Now,I can do it anymore... I deploy a new VM with Windows XP, just for test but I can't migrate... I get this error: Sep 11 10:57:03 starting migration of VM 101 to

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

Am 08.09.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > >> Am 04.09.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Gilberto Nunes: >>> I'm in trouble here with cluster construction... >>> Do you had some trouble with cluster configuration?? >> Yes, I did have troubles - adding a node failed. What's the problem in >> your

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

Am 04.09.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Gilberto Nunes: I'm in trouble here with cluster construction... Do you had some trouble with cluster configuration?? Yes, I did have troubles - adding a node failed. What's the problem in your case? How did you add the node? What was the failure message?

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

Hi again... Well... I don't remmeber right know, but I was able to create the cluster, but unable to add the other node... Finally, I give up, format both servers and re-install everything from scratch Now it's works nicely... Thanks 2015-09-07 19:03 GMT-03:00 Hermann Himmelbauer

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

Am 04.09.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Gilberto Nunes: > Hi guys > Somebody here is using PVE 4??? > How is it?? Yes, I personally use it and like it. But I have no comparison to PVE 3 as I'm a newcomer to PVE. It seems PVE 4 is quite stable but I experience the following shortcomings: - No ceph

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

Hi Hermann.. I am more interessting in HA fetures, mainly watchdog/softdog... I will try it Thanks a lot 2015-09-04 9:28 GMT-03:00 Hermann Himmelbauer : > Am 04.09.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Gilberto Nunes: > > Hi guys > > Somebody here is using PVE 4??? > > How is it?? > > Yes, I

[PVE-User] PVE 4

Hi guys Somebody here is using PVE 4??? How is it?? -- Gilberto Ferreira +55 (47) 9676-7530 Skype: gilberto.nunes36 ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 4

yes but not in any production environment yet On 9/4/2015 8:19 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi guys Somebody here is using PVE 4??? How is it?? -- Gilberto Ferreira +55 (47) 9676-7530 Skype: gilberto.nunes36 ___ pve-user mailing list