Re: [PVE-User] Ceph down?

2016-10-12 Thread Brian ::
http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2016/10/11/dreamcompute-us-east-1-cluster-service-disruption/ 24 hours down so far. Can't wait to read the RFO On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Karsten Becker wrote: > Hi, > > I ncan confirm that I was not able to call the documentation

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph down?

2016-10-12 Thread Karsten Becker
Hi, I ncan confirm that I was not able to call the documentation sections of the Ceph pages yesterday... they were down also. So just drink some tea. Regards Karsten On 12.10.2016 17:16, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > > 'download.ceph.com' seems down. > > So, a simple: > pveceph install > >

[PVE-User] Ceph down?

2016-10-12 Thread Marco Gaiarin
'download.ceph.com' seems down. So, a simple: pveceph install stall. After fiddling a bit, i've done: root@capitanamerica:~# diff -ud /usr/share/perl5/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm.orig /usr/share/perl5/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm --- /usr/share/perl5/PVE/CLI/pveceph.pm.orig 2016-10-12

Re: [PVE-User] Manpage qm

2016-10-12 Thread Karsten Becker
Thanks for the clarification! :-) Kind regards Karsten On 12.10.2016 16:22, Dietmar Maurer wrote: >> What do we overlook? Or is the manpage simply wrong? > > yes, it is misleading - sorry. > >> The fact that means the storage device is not really obvious. >> That the size=5 is not working

Re: [PVE-User] Manpage qm

2016-10-12 Thread Dietmar Maurer
> What do we overlook? Or is the manpage simply wrong? yes, it is misleading - sorry. > The fact that means the storage device is not really obvious. > That the size=5 is not working is not understood by us. size is only used after creation. > Some more comments/examples for such an

Re: [PVE-User] Manpage qm

2016-10-12 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Karsten Becker wrote: > Hi, > > we are currently sitting here in the advanced training and try to create > a VM from commandline according to the manpage of qm. > > We are reading this in the manpage: > > > -virtio[n] [file=] [,aio=]

Re: [PVE-User] Remove node name from title

2016-10-12 Thread Sten Aus
I'm using Haproxy to proxy traffic to different web GUIs and it really does not matter what node I am directly using in cluster. Especially that they don't matter - in my scenario all nodes should be able to to the same. On 12.10.16 13:22, Kevin Lemonnier wrote: is there a specific reason

[PVE-User] Manpage qm

2016-10-12 Thread Karsten Becker
Hi, we are currently sitting here in the advanced training and try to create a VM from commandline according to the manpage of qm. We are reading this in the manpage: > -virtio[n] [file=] [,aio=] [,backup=<1|0>] > [,bps=] [,bps_rd=] [,bps_wr=] >

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph Cache Tiering

2016-10-12 Thread Adam Thompson
That makes sense - the ZIL acts as a writeback cache for you. If the latency between QEMU and ZFS were higher (e.g. across NFS, maybe across a router, too) then you'd likely be able to measure a small difference. If the latencies are all small enough, any single writeback cache an will likely

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph Cache Tiering

2016-10-12 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 12/10/2016 9:55 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: Ultimately, "Always Use DirectIO" is a religious belief, not a technically sound belief. There are situations where it makes sense, and other situations where it doesn't. The same can be said of*every single* setting - if there were only One True

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph Cache Tiering

2016-10-12 Thread Adam Thompson
Writeback clearly defines what is and isn't protected, so yes, there are some guarantees. There are also some guaranteed data-loss scenarios. Even "Writeback (unsafe)" provides guarantees of a sort, but there is a big difference between it and simple "Writeback". Choosing the appropriate

Re: [PVE-User] Remove node name from title

2016-10-12 Thread Kevin Lemonnier
> > is there a specific reason why you want to remove the nodename? > imho it is very useful when you have multiple tabs for multple nodes, > as you can directly see which tab is which node > I guess, but when you have a cluster in might be better to show the cluster name, the node isn't really

Re: [PVE-User] Remove node name from title

2016-10-12 Thread Dominik Csapak
On 10/12/2016 10:31 AM, Sten Aus wrote: Hi How can I remove node name from the web title? is there a specific reason why you want to remove the nodename? imho it is very useful when you have multiple tabs for multple nodes, as you can directly see which tab is which node

Re: [PVE-User] online migration fails with processor type "KVM64"

2016-10-12 Thread Bastian Sebode
Hello Thomas, I would guess you just forgot to enable AMD-V (Hardwarevirtualisation) on your third node. That's why the KVM64-CPU doesn't work on this node but on the other two and with CPU set to host Hardwarevirtualisation is not needed because everything happens in the software. Best Regards

[PVE-User] online migration fails with processor type "KVM64"

2016-10-12 Thread Thomas Naumann
hi at all, cluster-setup is: - 3 nodes / proxmox 4.3-1/e7cdc165 - CPU on all nodes is 8x Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2356 (2 sockets) - RAM: node 1 = 16 GB RAM, node 2 and 3 = 32 GB - storage for VMs = DRBD (drbd-utils version 8.9.8-1, drbdmanage version 0.97.3-1) issue: if processor type of

[PVE-User] Remove node name from title

2016-10-12 Thread Sten Aus
Hi How can I remove node name from the web title? nodeA - Proxmox Virtual Environment Btw, Proxmox 4.3 rocks and upgrade from 3.4 to 4.3 went smoothly! ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com