Re: [PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

Moin, es hat tatsächlich eine reboot der Maschine benötigt und die SSD war wieder frei und konnte neu eingebunden werden. Grüße Gregor ___ pve-user mailing list pve-user@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

On 3/9/20 3:37 PM, Leandro Roggerone wrote: Can not do snapshots ? but can do bakups ? is it necessary to turn off VM ? Regads. Backups in "snapshot" mode (i.e. without turning off the VM) are always possible, even on storages not supporting snapshots. El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 10:39,

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Can not do snapshots ? but can do bakups ? is it necessary to turn off VM ? Regads. El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 10:39, Laurent Dumont () escribió: > I'm not sure if this still stands but you cannot do snapshots on a raw > format, only qcow2. > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 9:35 AM Leandro Roggerone >

Re: [PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:35:05PM +0100, Gregor Burck wrote: > Moin, > > > Wie genau den? Down -> Out -> Destroy, über die GUI? > Yep über die GUI Am besten das 'cleanup disks' angeklickt lassen. Damit wird die Partitionstabelle und die ersten 200 MB entfernt. Oder per CLI mit '--cleanup'. > >

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

On 3/9/20 2:37 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote: I'm not sure if this still stands but you cannot do snapshots on a raw format, only qcow2. Correct, but note that this only applies to file-based raw storage, a "raw" volume on lvm-thin, ZFS, etc. does of course support snapshots. On file-based

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

I'm not sure if this still stands but you cannot do snapshots on a raw format, only qcow2. On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 9:35 AM Leandro Roggerone wrote: > Is there any reason to use qcow2 format ? > Im asking because I received qcow2 disk from an old system and need to > upload into my new pve. > I

Re: [PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

Moin, > Wie genau den? Down -> Out -> Destroy, über die GUI? Yep über die GUI > Die Disk muss nach dem zerstören der OSD noch gelöscht werden. Ein dd > (200 MB) und sgdisk -Z / sollte genügen. sgdisk kannte ich noch nicht, brachte aber erst mal keinen Unterschied. > Im Betrieb kommt das eher

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Is there any reason to use qcow2 format ? Im asking because I received qcow2 disk from an old system and need to upload into my new pve. I just want to know why people used this, my system currently does not support it. Leandro.

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

This server fault post was written in 2012. I will do some test in the lab but those results seem really really low for a modern system with modern packages. On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 9:21 AM Roland @web.de wrote: > >Performance-wise, they should be almost the same. qcow2 is a bit more > complex

Re: [PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

Moin, evtl. noch als Informationen: Die osdis nicht mehr in der ceph crush map aufgeführt. Eine neu eingesetzte SSD könnte ich als osd einbinden. Diese wird auch unter Disk --> Usage mit No angezeigt. Grüße Gregor ___ pve-user mailing list

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

>Performance-wise, they should be almost the same. qcow2 is a bit more complex than a raw file/partition, but I don't think you'll notice any impact. i did test that a while ago and got very different results, qcow2 was much slower on my system. cannot provide details, though (did not save that)

Re: [PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

Hallo Gregor, On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:07:20PM +0100, Gregor Burck wrote: > Moin, > > ich teste verschiedenes mit CEPH. > Dabei habe ich eine SSD über Destroy entfernt. Wie genau den? Down -> Out -> Destroy, über die GUI? > > Wie kann ich die SSD wieder in den Cluster aufnehmen? Beim

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Hola Leandro, El 9/3/20 a las 13:21, Leandro Roggerone escribió: Thankyou Eneko , Are features / performance difference between those formats ? Take a look at: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage Performance-wise, they should be almost the same. qcow2 is a bit more complex than a raw

Re: [PVE-User] VZdump: No such disk, but the disk is there!

Solved after upgrade to PVE6. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira Em qui., 20 de fev. de 2020 às 12:26, Gilberto Nunes < gilberto.nune...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Any advice? > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > > (47) 3025-5907 > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > Skype: gilberto.nunes36 > > > >

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Thankyou Eneko , Are features / performance difference between those formats ? Regards, Leandro. Libre de virus. www.avast.com

Re: [PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Hola Leandro, El 9/3/20 a las 13:11, Leandro Roggerone escribió: Hi guys, after install pve , would like to create my first VM. I noticed that only available format is raw. Question is: Is qcow2 deprecated ? What are differences between them ? (I already google it but is not 100% clear). This

[PVE-User] qcow2 vs raw format

Hi guys, after install pve , would like to create my first VM. I noticed that only available format is raw. Question is: Is qcow2 deprecated ? What are differences between them ? (I already google it but is not 100% clear). This is my storage configuration is. root@pve:~# cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg

[PVE-User] SSD als osd neu initialisieren/wieder aufnehmen

Moin, ich teste verschiedenes mit CEPH. Dabei habe ich eine SSD über Destroy entfernt. Wie kann ich die SSD wieder in den Cluster aufnehmen? Beim Hinzufügen wird mir keine verfügbare SSD angezeigt? Unter Disks wurde die SSD auch noch als osd.4 bezeichnet. Darufhin habe ich auf der Konsole per

[PVE-User] Creating VM with thin provisioning (ESXi fashion)

Sorry to compare ... between systems , I just want to get to the same function: When you create a VM on vmware you assign a max storage , for example 400Gb. Then you can see from vm dashboard that this VM is using 194Gb. But ,if I look inside the VM , you will see: [root@ftp ~]# lsblk NAME

Re: [PVE-User] Unprivileged container and fstrim...

Mandi! Tom Weber In chel di` si favelave... > pct fstrim > on the host? AAARRGHHH! Totaly missed that. Sorry to the list, and thanks. ;-) -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia''

Re: [PVE-User] Unprivileged container and fstrim...

Am Montag, den 09.03.2020, 11:34 +0100 schrieb Marco Gaiarin: > I was abused to do a 'fstrim /' weekly run on my privileged > containers, > and seems that the command was effective: > > root@vdcsv1:~# fstrim -v / > /: 18,6 GiB (19946131456 bytes) trimmed > > but after convert many

[PVE-User] Unprivileged container and fstrim...

I was abused to do a 'fstrim /' weekly run on my privileged containers, and seems that the command was effective: root@vdcsv1:~# fstrim -v / /: 18,6 GiB (19946131456 bytes) trimmed but after convert many of them to unprivileged ones: root@vmw:~# fstrim -v /