Re: [PVE-User] CEPH performance

--- Begin Message --- The simplest thing to set also is to make sure you are using writeback cache in your vms with ceph. It makes a huge difference in performance. On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, 07:31 Eneko Lacunza, wrote: > Hi Marco, > > El 9/6/20 a las 19:46, Marco Bellini escribió: > > Dear All, > >

Re: [PVE-User] VM Power Issue

--- Begin Message --- Sivakumar - This is a "known issue" as far as I am aware, usually when you are allocating quite a bit of memory (although 16G is not a lot in your case, but maybe the server doesn't have much ram?) when starting a vm with a PCI device passed through to it. It also only seems

Re: [PVE-User] no iommu detected please activate it.see documentation for further information

--- Begin Message --- Have you enabled IOMMU in the BIOS? Assuming your server hardware supports it? On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 15:03, Sivakumar SARAVANAN < sivakumar.saravanan.jv@valeo-siemens.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am unable to add the PCI device to VM's, where I am getting below error >

Re: [PVE-User] Some VM's are not able to start

000,mac=3E:DE:DC:87:CE:75,netdev=net0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x12,id=net0,bootindex=300' > -rtc 'driftfix=slew,base=localtime' -machine 'type=pc+pve1' -global > 'kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=discard'' failed: exit code 1 > > > Best regards > SK > > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:37 PM Mark Adams via pv

Re: [PVE-User] Some VM's are not able to start

> SK > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:20 PM Mark Adams via pve-user < > pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Mark Adams > > To: PVE User List > > Cc: > > Bcc: > >

Re: [PVE-User] Some VM's are not able to start

--- Begin Message --- Do you really need hugepages? if not disable it. On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 17:17, Sivakumar SARAVANAN < sivakumar.saravanan.jv@valeo-siemens.com> wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > Thanks for coming back. > > I mean, I am unable to power ON the VM until shutdown the other VM's in

Re: [PVE-User] critical HA problem on a PVE6 cluster

--- Begin Message --- As Eneko already said, this really sounds like a network problem - if your hosts lose connectivity to each other they will reboot themselves, and it sounds like this is what happened to you. You are sure there has been no changes to your network around the time this

[PVE-User] VM Start timeout with pci passthrough

--- Begin Message --- Hi All, I am having the issue that is detailed in this forum post: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/vm-start-timeout-with-pci-gpu.45843/ I thought I would take it to the mailing list to see if anyone here has any ideas? VM's boot fine the first time the machine starts

Re: [PVE-User] lzo files conundrum

--- Begin Message --- Is the data inside the VM's different? maybe the data on the bigger one is not as compressible? On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, 08:07 Renato Gallo via pve-user, < pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> wrote: > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Renato Gallo > To: g noto > Cc:

Re: [PVE-User] Creating VM with thin provisioning (please help me understand it).

box option is only available on zfs storage as I guess you have the option for both, where as lvmthin should always be thin? On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:43, Mark Adams wrote: > Thin provisioning is set on the storage, it is a checkbox and of course it > has to be a storage type than can be thin

Re: [PVE-User] Creating VM with thin provisioning (please help me understand it).

--- Begin Message --- Atila - just to follow up on Giannis discard notes, depending on what OS and filesystems you use inside of your VMs, you may need to run fstrim, mount with different options, or run specific commands (ie zpool trim for zfs) to get it all working correctly. Regards, Mark On

Re: [PVE-User] Creating VM with thin provisioning (please help me understand it).

andro. > > > > > El jue., 5 mar. 2020 a las 13:44, Mark Adams via pve-user (< > pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Mark Adams > > To: PVE User List > > Cc: &

Re: [PVE-User] Creating VM with thin provisioning (please help me understand it).

--- Begin Message --- Thin provisioning is set on the storage, it is a checkbox and of course it has to be a storage type than can be thin provisioned (ie lvmthin, zfs, ceph etc). Then every virtual disk that is created on that storage type is thin provisioned. Regards, Mark On Thu, 5 Mar 2020,

Re: [PVE-User] Reboot on psu failure in redundant setup

and clearing this up for me. Cheers, Mark On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 15:48, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 11/8/19 4:22 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > > I didn't configure it to do > > this myself, so is this an automatic feature? Everything I have read says > > it should be configure

[PVE-User] Reboot on psu failure in redundant setup

Hi All, This cluster is on 5.4-11. This is most probably a hardware issue either with ups or server psus, but wanted to check if there is any default watchdog or auto reboot in a proxmox HA cluster. Explanation of what happened: All servers have redundant psu, being fed from separate ups in

Re: [PVE-User] SQL server 2014 poor performances

There is a WD Blue SSD - but it is a desktop drive, you probably shouldn't use it in a server. Are you using the virtio-scsi blockdev and the newest virtio drivers? also, have you tried with writeback enabled? Have you tested the performance of your ssd zpool from the command line on the host?

Re: [PVE-User] AMD ZEN 2 (EPYC 7002 aka "rome") kernel requirements

Thanks for your responses Thomas and Fabian. On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 09:37, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On September 27, 2019 10:30 am, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm trying out one of these new processors, and it looks like I need at > > least 5.2

[PVE-User] AMD ZEN 2 (EPYC 7002 aka "rome") kernel requirements

Hi All, I'm trying out one of these new processors, and it looks like I need at least 5.2 kernel to get some support, preferably 5.3. At present the machine will boot in to proxmox, but IOMMU does not work, and I can see ECC memory is not working. So my question is, whats the recommended way to

Re: [PVE-User] PVE 5.4: cannot move disk image to Ceph

Is it potentially an issue with having the same pool name on 2 different ceph clusters? is there a vm-112-disk-0 on vdisks_cluster2? On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 12:45 Uwe Sauter, wrote: > Hello Alwin, > > Am 06.09.19 um 11:32 schrieb Alwin Antreich: > > Hello Uwe, > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at

Re: [PVE-User] Move VM's HDD incl. snapshots from one Ceph to another

port-diff and import-diff to send just the changes between snapshots though in case it doesn't and you want to build it up from the earliest snapshot. Sorry that's not more exact! Regards, Mark > > Regards, > > Uwe > > > > Am 19.08.19 um 12:30 schrieb Mark Adams

Re: [PVE-User] Move VM's HDD incl. snapshots from one Ceph to another

It is relatively straight forward using cli, use the rbd export (and export-diff) command over ssh. On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, 12:26 Eneko Lacunza, wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > El 19/8/19 a las 10:14, Uwe Sauter escribió: > > is it possible to move a VM's disks from one Ceph cluster to another, > including

Re: [PVE-User] Storage Server Recommendations Please (JR Richardson)

Do you need your storage to be High-Availability? This also has a bearing on what might be a good solution. If you don't need HA, then a zfs backed linux server sharing nfs would be very straight forward. But even better would be using the zfs over iscsi features of proxmox so that each of your

Re: [PVE-User] zfs 0.7 no discard

ession enabled. > Then I would run zfs trim command inside the VM and see if the space is > reclaimed back on the host. > > Note: fstrim command only works on specific filesystems, not in zfs. > > Gianni > > > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 21:01, Mark Adams wrote: > > >

Re: [PVE-User] zfs 0.7 no discard

x.com/wiki/Shrink_Qcow2_Disk_Files > > Gianni > > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 09:49, Mark Adams wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Currently having an issue on a few servers where more space is being > "used" > > in the host (zfs), than is actually

[PVE-User] zfs 0.7 no discard

Hi All, Currently having an issue on a few servers where more space is being "used" in the host (zfs), than is actually being used inside the VM. Discard is enabled, but zfs 0.7 does not have support for it. zfs 0.8 has brought in discard support, so I was wondering if anyone else has upgraded

Re: [PVE-User] Shutting down Windows 10, 2016 and 2019 VMs

s://forum.proxmox.com/threads/windows-vm-fails-to-shutdown-from-proxmox-web.54233/#post-249883 > > By the way, somebody should fix it. > I got the solution from Redhat. > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:21 PM Mark Adams wrote: > > > So the appropriate thing for you to d

Re: [PVE-User] Shutting down Windows 10, 2016 and 2019 VMs

; > > > However, the guest agent from the latest stable VirtIO ISO is *not* the > > > latest one. You may need the version from > > > > > > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/direct-downloads/latest-qemu-ga/ > > > > > > Bye,

Re: [PVE-User] Shutting down Windows 10, 2016 and 2019 VMs

I haven't tried 2019 as yet, but windows 10 and 2016 work fine for me. Make sure your following this correctly! https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Qemu-guest-agent Regards On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 12:52, Saint Michael wrote: > I have not been able to shut down from Proxmox a Windows VM from any >

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

would love to have your input. Cheers, Mark On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:53, Mark Adams wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:34, Alwin Antreich > wrote: > >> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:34:44AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: >> > Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my re

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 11:34, Alwin Antreich wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 09:34:44AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my response below. > > > > > > I have the same size and count in each node, but I have had a disk >

Re: [PVE-User] ceph rebalance/ raw vs pool usage

Thanks for getting back to me Alwin. See my response below. On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 08:10, Alwin Antreich wrote: > Hello Mark, > > On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I would appreciate a little pointer or clarification on

Re: [PVE-User] Windows Server 2003

interesting: > > # qm config VMID > > > > > >> Serial driver? Don't have have any odd devices showing up in the > device list > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/24/2019 2:02 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > >>> Haven't tried this myself

Re: [PVE-User] Windows Server 2003

Haven't tried this myself, but have you updated the qemu-agent and serial driver to check it's not that? On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, 18:59 David Lawley, wrote: > I know, its an oldie, but.. Windows Server 2003 > > But since moving it to PVE 5.4 (from3.4) its does not reboot/restart on > its own. You

Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Replication on different storage

Why don't you just rename the zpool so they match? On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, 09:10 Fabrizio Cuseo, wrote: > Hello Gianni. > I wrote in my email that pve-zsync is not suitable for my need (redundancy > with VM migration from one host to another). > > Fabrizio > > - Il 15-mar-19, alle 10:08,

Re: [PVE-User] MxGPU with AMD S7150

For posterity, I sorted this by speaking with ASRock Rack and getting an as-yet unreleased bios that has the ARI forwarding option. Enabled this and all working now. On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 13:20, Dominik Csapak wrote: > On 01.03.19 14:13, Mark Adams wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019

Re: [PVE-User] MxGPU with AMD S7150

On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 12:52, Dominik Csapak wrote: > On 01.03.19 13:37, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm trying this out, based on the wiki post and the forum posts: > > > > > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/amd-s7150-mxgpu-with-proxmox-ve-5-x.50

[PVE-User] MxGPU with AMD S7150

Hi All, I'm trying this out, based on the wiki post and the forum posts: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/amd-s7150-mxgpu-with-proxmox-ve-5-x.50464/ https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/MxGPU_with_AMD_S7150_under_Proxmox_VE_5.x However I'm having issues getting the gim driver working. Was just

Re: [PVE-User] PVE Cluster and iSCSI

.nunes36 > > > > > > Em qua, 28 de nov de 2018 às 22:24, Mark Adams > escreveu: > > > As long as you have access to the iSCSI storage from all nodes in the > > cluster then why not? > > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 19:20, Gilberto Nunes > > &g

Re: [PVE-User] PVE Cluster and iSCSI

As long as you have access to the iSCSI storage from all nodes in the cluster then why not? On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 19:20, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hi there > > Is there any problem to use PVE cluster with iSCSI Direct or not ( I mean > shared)? > > Thanks > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > >

Re: [PVE-User] NVMe

Did you reinstall from the proxmox ISO after changing boot mode to legacy? Regards. Mark On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 14:08, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: > I set legacy boot in bios. > Use only one disk with lvm. > And system not start with this. > > Any sugestion ? > >> I have a problem. > >> Im

Re: [PVE-User] HA Failover if shared storage fails on one Node

What interface is your cluster communication (corosync) running over? As this is the link that needs to be unavailable to initiate a VM start on another node AFAIK. Basically, the other nodes in the cluster need to be seeing a problem with the node. If its still communicating over the whichever

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox per VM memory limit

assuming the OS in the VM supports it, as much as the host hardware can support (no limit). On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 19:35, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hi there! > > How many memory per VM I get in PVE? > Is there some limit? 1 TB? 2 TB? > Just curious > > Thanks > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > >

Re: [PVE-User] Ceph Cluster with proxmox failure

also, 3 out of 6 servers is not quorum. you need a majority of the total. On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 21:22 Mark Adams, wrote: > the exact same 3 servers have been down and everything has worked? do you > run ceph mons on every server? > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 21:19 Gilberto Nun

Re: [PVE-User] dual host HA solution in 5.2

If you have to stick with 2 servers, personally I would go for zfs as your storage. Storage replication using zfs in proxmox has been made super simple. This is asynchronous though, unlike DRBD. You would have to manually start your VM's should the "live" node go down and the data will be out of

Re: [PVE-User] Spice and Windows as VDI solution

Sounds like you need to speak to your local Microsoft license re seller. On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 13:33, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hi there > > When using spice I will need the infamous Windows User Access Cal, to every > simple user if will connect to Spice session?? > I need install 10 VM with

Re: [PVE-User] Fedora 28

If you don't have a license, you need to change the repository. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_Repositories#_proxmox_ve_no_subscription_repository On 12 September 2018 at 10:01, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: > How i make this upgrading ??!! > > root@hayne1:~# apt upgrade > Reading

Re: [PVE-User] Confusing about Bond 802.3ad

At least 1.3 gbps. > > Don't know why! > > Em 24/08/2018 17:36, "mj" escreveu: > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > On 08/24/2018 06:20 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > > > > > >> also, balance-rr through a switch requires each nic to be

Re: [PVE-User] Confusing about Bond 802.3ad

also, balance-rr through a switch requires each nic to be on a seperate vlan. You probably need to remove your lacp config also but this depends on switch model and configuration. so safest idea is remove it. so I think you have 3 nodes for example: node1: ens0 on port 1 vlan 10 ens1 on

Re: [PVE-User] DHCP for non cloudinit VM

What sort of OS are you using for VM's, that does not default to having DHCP enabled? I personally can't think of one that isn't DHCP out of the box. As for using specific IP's based on MAC address, this would be easily set in the dhcp server config? On 21 August 2018 at 08:48, José Manuel Giner

Re: [PVE-User] DHCP for non cloudinit VM

Maybe lost in translation? He said "determine" not "configure". That means installing qemu agent in the guest will allow the proxmox interface to show you what IP it is using. On 20 August 2018 at 23:16, Vinicius Barreto wrote: > Hello please could you tell which command what qemu agent do you

Re: [PVE-User] DHCP for non cloudinit VM

Just install your own DHCP server on proxmox if you want. I don't see this as a feature many people would want, as in any "normal" network you always have a dhcp server already? On 20 August 2018 at 15:35, José Manuel Giner wrote: > I thought cloud-init was connecting against a DHCP server. > >

Re: [PVE-User] Poor CEPH performance? or normal?

a per image setting. you may need to make the rbd >> image and migrate data. >> >> On 07/26/18 12:25, Mark Adams wrote: >> >>> Thanks for your suggestions. Do you know if it is possible to change an >>> existing rbd pool to striping? or does this have t

Re: [PVE-User] Poor CEPH performance? or normal?

Hi Ronny, Thanks for your suggestions. Do you know if it is possible to change an existing rbd pool to striping? or does this have to be done on first setup? Regards, Mark On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, 19:20 Ronny Aasen, wrote: > On 25. juli 2018 02:19, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, >

Re: [PVE-User] Poor CEPH performance? or normal?

Hi Alwin, On 25 July 2018 at 07:10, Alwin Antreich wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 02:20 Mark Adams wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I have a proxmox 5.1 + ceph cluster of 3 nodes, each with 12 x WD 10TB > GOLD > > drives. Network is 10Gbps on

[PVE-User] Poor CEPH performance? or normal?

Hi All, I have a proxmox 5.1 + ceph cluster of 3 nodes, each with 12 x WD 10TB GOLD drives. Network is 10Gbps on X550-T2, separate network for the ceph cluster. I have 1 VM currently running on this cluster, which is debian stretch with a zpool on it. I'm zfs sending in to it, but only getting

Re: [PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

ng how to manually solve > problems when they arise via the CLI in my opinion is also a > must.Especially when you deal with a complicated storage like Ceph > > Y > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM Alwin Antreich > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 11:05:52AM +0100, Mar

Re: [PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

On 5 July 2018 at 11:04, Alwin Antreich wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 10:26:34AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi Anwin; > > > > Thanks for that - It's all working now! Just to confirm though, shouldn't > > the destroy button handle some of these actions? or is

Re: [PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

Hi Anwin; Thanks for that - It's all working now! Just to confirm though, shouldn't the destroy button handle some of these actions? or is it left out on purpose? Regards, Mark On 3 July 2018 at 16:16, Alwin Antreich wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:18:53PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: >

Re: [PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

Hi Alwin, please see my response below. On 3 July 2018 at 10:07, Alwin Antreich wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:05:51AM +0100, Mark Adams wrote: > > Currently running the newest 5.2-1 version, I had a test cluster which > was > > working fine. I since added more dis

Re: [PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

k On 3 July 2018 at 01:34, Woods, Ken A (DNR) wrote: > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rados/operations/add-or- > rm-osds/#removing-osds-manual > > Are you sure you followed the directions? > > ____ > From: pve-user on behalf of Mark Ad

[PVE-User] pveceph createosd after destroyed osd

Currently running the newest 5.2-1 version, I had a test cluster which was working fine. I since added more disks, first stopping, then setting out, then destroying each osd so I could recreate it all from scratch. However, when adding a new osd (either via GUI or pveceph CLI) it seems to show a

Re: [PVE-User] pve-csync version of pve-zsync?

have implemented ceph replication out of proxmox code, I'll > try to work on it this summer. > > > - Mail original - > De: "Mark Adams" <m...@openvs.co.uk> > À: "proxmoxve" <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> > Envoyé: Mardi 15 Mai 2018 00:13:0

Re: [PVE-User] pve-csync version of pve-zsync?

gt; same. > > I'll try to look also at rbd mirror, but it's only work with librbd in > qemu, not with krbd, > so it can't be implemented for container. > > > - Mail original - > De: "Mark Adams" <m...@openvs.co.uk> > À: "proxmoxve" <pve-use

Re: [PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

Hi Wolfgang, So does this mean that all those processes are sitting in a "queue" waiting to execute? wouldn't it be more sensible for the script to terminate if a process is already running for the same job? Regards, Mark On 21 March 2018 at 12:40, Wolfgang Link wrote: >

[PVE-User] pve-zsync processes

Hi All, I've been using pve-zsync for a few months - it seems to work pretty well. However, I have just noticed it doesn't seem to be terminating itself correctly. at present I have around 800 pve-zsync processes (sleeping) which all seems to be duplicates. (I would expect 1 per VMID?) Has

Re: [PVE-User] pve-csync version of pve-zsync?

doc hasn't been updated for newer versions...) Regards, Mark On 13 March 2018 at 17:19, Alwin Antreich <a.antre...@proxmox.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:51:32PM +, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi Alwin, > > > > The last I looked at it, rbd mirror only worked i

Re: [PVE-User] pve-csync version of pve-zsync?

12, 2018 at 03:49:42PM +0000, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Has anyone looked at or thought of making a version of pve-zsync for > ceph? > > > > This would be great for DR scenarios... > > > > How easy do you think this would be to do? I imagine

[PVE-User] pve-csync version of pve-zsync?

Hi All, Has anyone looked at or thought of making a version of pve-zsync for ceph? This would be great for DR scenarios... How easy do you think this would be to do? I imagine it wouId it be quite similar to pve-zsync, but using rbd export-diff and rbd import-diff instead of zfs send and zfs

[PVE-User] ZFS Replication

Im just trying out the zfs replication in proxmox, nice work! Just a few questions.. - Is it possible to change the network that does the replication? (IE be good to use a direct connected with balance-rr for throughput) - Is it possible to replicate between machines that are not in the same

Re: [PVE-User] HA Fencing

On 5 December 2017 at 08:52, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lampre...@proxmox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/04/2017 07:51 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > > On 17 November 2017 at 10:55, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lampre...@proxmox.com> > wrote: > >> On 11/16/2017 0

Re: [PVE-User] HA Fencing

Hi, On 17 November 2017 at 10:55, Thomas Lamprecht <t.lampre...@proxmox.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/16/2017 07:20 PM, Mark Adams wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It looks like in newer versions of proxmox, the only fencing type advised > > is watchdog. Is th

[PVE-User] HA Fencing

Hi all, It looks like in newer versions of proxmox, the only fencing type advised is watchdog. Is that the case? Is it still possible to do PDU fencing as well? This should enable us to be able to fail over faster as the fence will not fail if the machine has no power right? Thanks

[PVE-User] snapshot=off

Hi All, On proxmox 5.1, with ceph as storage, I'm trying to disable the snapshotting of a specific disk on a VM. This is not an option in the gui, but I've added the option to the disk in the conf file scsi1: ssd_ceph_vm:vm-100-disk-2,discard=on,size=32G,snapshot=off However, this seems to be

Re: [PVE-User] ZFS over iSCSI in Linux box versus OmniOS box

Try create more than 10 vdisks (doesn't have to be all in the same VM...) It never worked after 10 for me. On 28 October 2017 at 14:11, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Just a note: with Ubuntu I am using IET ( iSCSI Enterprise Target) and it's > seems faster than ever! > >

Re: [PVE-User] PVE ZFS Over ISCSI

Imo, don't even bother trying to do this with tgt. I got it working some time ago but it was flakey, and started having dataset naming issues after about 10 disks. The only working (stable) zfs over iscsi with proxmox afaik is using comstar (which to be fair to proxmox devs, is what they say in

Re: [PVE-User] ZFS on iSCSI + Pacemaker/corosync/DRBD

-10" Is anyone using zfs over iscsi with iet? have you seen this behaviour? Thanks, Mark On 23 November 2016 at 20:40, Michael Rasmussen <m...@miras.org> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:40:55 + > Mark Adams <m...@openvs.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Has any

[PVE-User] ZFS on iSCSI + Pacemaker/corosync/DRBD

Hi All, I'm testing out proxmox and trying to get a working ZFS on iSCSI HA setup going. Because ZFS on iSCSI logs on to the iscsi server via ssh and creates a zfs dataset then adds iscsi config to /etc/ietd.conf it works fine when you've got a single iscsi host, but I haven't figured out a way