Re: [PVE-User] Container problem

2018-12-04 Thread Thomas Lamprecht
On 12/4/18 10:27 AM, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: > root@hayne:~# systemctl start pve-container@108 > Job for pve-container@108.service failed because the control process exited > with error code. > See "systemctl status pve-container@108.service" and "journalctl -xe" for > details. > > root@hayne:~#

[PVE-User] Container problem

2018-12-04 Thread lord_Niedzwiedz
root@hayne:~# systemctl start pve-container@108 Job for pve-container@108.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status pve-container@108.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. root@hayne:~# systemctl status pve-container@108.service ●

[PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Martin Maurer
Hi all! We are very excited to announce the general availability of Proxmox VE 5.3! Proxmox VE now integrates CephFS, a distributed, POSIX-compliant file system which serves as an interface to the Ceph storage (like the RBD). You can store backupfiles, ISO images, and container templates.

Re: [PVE-User] [pve-devel] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Hi there! I would like to say a big THANK YOU! Proxmox has evolve a lot since previosly versions... Indeed, I knew this wonderful VE in version 1.x and compare it today, seems a lot of improvements Thanks a lot. --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 3025-5907 (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Alwin Antreich
Hi Lindsay, On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:59:41PM +1000, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > One server has upgraded clean so far, but the 2nd one wants to remove pve :( > > apt-get dist-upgrade > The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer > required: >   apparmor ceph-fuse criu

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Stoiko Ivanov
Hi, On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 00:25:36 +1000 Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > On 5/12/2018 12:17 am, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > to me the most strage thing is the removal of grub (which in turn > > probably leads to the removal of proxmox-ve) > > > Get:1 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Stoiko Ivanov
Hi, to me the most strage thing is the removal of grub (which in turn probably leads to the removal of proxmox-ve) could you please post the complete output of `apt update`? do you have any other repositories configured (/etc/apt/sources.list, /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*)? Thanks, stoiko On

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
One server has upgraded clean so far, but the 2nd one wants to remove pve :( apt-get dist-upgrade The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:   apparmor ceph-fuse criu ebtables fonts-font-awesome hdparm ipset libapparmor-perl libboost-iostreams1.55.0

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/12/2018 12:23 am, Alwin Antreich wrote: Please check your repository entries in '/etc/apt/source.list' & '/etc/apt/source.list.d/', are they pointing to the right repositories? sources.list should be ok: deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib # PVE pve-no-subscription

Re: [PVE-User] Container problem

2018-12-04 Thread lord_Niedzwiedz
W dniu 04.12.2018 o 10:41, Thomas Lamprecht pisze: On 12/4/18 10:27 AM, lord_Niedzwiedz wrote: root@hayne:~# systemctl start pve-container@108 Job for pve-container@108.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status pve-container@108.service" and

Re: [PVE-User] Container problem

2018-12-04 Thread lord_Niedzwiedz
root@hayne:~# systemctl start pve-container@108 Job for pve-container@108.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status pve-container@108.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. root@hayne:~# systemctl status pve-container@108.service ●

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Matias Ruggieri
what  a way to close the year Many congratulations to the entire Proxmox team! On 12/4/18 7:24 AM, Martin Maurer wrote: > Hi all! > > We are very excited to announce the general availability of Proxmox VE > 5.3! > > Proxmox VE now integrates CephFS, a distributed, POSIX-compliant file >

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/12/2018 12:17 am, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: Hi, to me the most strage thing is the removal of grub (which in turn probably leads to the removal of proxmox-ve) Get:1 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build InRelease Ign:1 file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository apt-build InRelease Get:2

Re: [PVE-User] Multicast problems with Intel X540 - 10Gtek network card?

2018-12-04 Thread Ronny Aasen
vmbr10 is a bridge (or as switch by another name) if you want the switch to work reliably with multicast you probably need to enable multicast querier. |echo 1 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/vmbr0/bridge/multicast_querier| or you can disable snooping, so that it treats multicast as broadcast. |

Re: [PVE-User] Multicast problems with Intel X540 - 10Gtek network card?

2018-12-04 Thread Marcus Haarmann
Hi, you did not provide details about your configuration. How is the network card set up ? Bonding ? Send your /etc/network/interfaces details. If bonding is active, check if the mode is correct in /proc/net/bonding. We encountered differences between /etc/network/interfaces setup and

Re: [PVE-User] Multicast problems with Intel X540 - 10Gtek network card?

2018-12-04 Thread Eneko Lacunza
hi Marcus, El 4/12/18 a las 16:09, Marcus Haarmann escribió: Hi, you did not provide details about your configuration. How is the network card set up ? Bonding ? Send your /etc/network/interfaces details. If bonding is active, check if the mode is correct in /proc/net/bonding. We encountered

Re: [PVE-User] Multicast problems with Intel X540 - 10Gtek network card?

2018-12-04 Thread Eneko Lacunza
Hi all, Seems I found the solution. eth3 on proxmox1 is a broadcom 1gbit card connected to HPE switch; it is VLAN 10 untagged on the switch end. I changed the vmbr10 bridge to use eth4.10 on the X540 card, and after ifdown/ifup and corosync and pve-cluster restart, now everything seems

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/12/2018 2:50 pm, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: Turned out to be my zabbix.list in the end, it was referencing jessie. Once I updated it to stretch, all was good. And turns out I was mistaken, still had the problem. It was my zfs setup - I used to have zfsonlinux installed, must have

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 5.3 released!

2018-12-04 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 5/12/2018 12:39 am, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: The/var/cache/apt-build/ lines look like you might have some leftover installation of apt-build? [0] Unless you know that you need it, remove the corresponding .list file (probably in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list). The lizardfs line still