Re: [py3porters-devel] Bug#782958: Please provide a python3 module

On April 22, 2015 9:59:49 PM EDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote: I declare defeat. I rewrote debian/rules following a current python3 package but I am hitting a brick wall as the substvers does not work. And maybe the package does not build the same way. For the (new) python3 I get

Re: [py3porters-devel] PEP 394 in debian? (/usr/bin/python could be python3)

On February 20, 2018 3:12:00 AM UTC, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >On Sun 2018-02-18 14:15:46 +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Switching /usr/bin/python to point at python3 won't happen before >> python2 is removed from the archive. I wouldn't w

Re: [py3porters-devel] PEP 394 in debian? (/usr/bin/python could be python3)

On Thursday, February 22, 2018 04:44:17 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2018-02-21 15:11:42 -0800, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2018, at 19:12, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> Is there any reason *not* to ask command-line tools that are > >> python2-only to

Re: [py3porters-devel] PEP 394 in debian? (/usr/bin/python could be python3)

On February 18, 2018 4:38:01 AM UTC, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >Hey folks-- > >a lot of work has been done to make debian python3 friendly. thanks >for >that! > >I'm wondering whether there are any plans to encourage conversion of >/usr/bin/python to point to python3?