On 06/08/2010 19:45, Smartboy wrote:
I came across the PyGObject bindings today through the fedora mail
which was linked to on this list, and since have been wondering why it
isn't mentioned anywhere else. I think that a notice should be put
somewhere on the PyGTK site that there are now PyGObje
Hi Jens,
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 06:55, Jens Knutson wrote:
>
> I am organizing a sprint for my local Python user group to try to port (at
> least partially) a widely used module to P3k. (We're looking at Mutagen
> right now.)
>
> If this goes well, or at the very least, if it turns out I don't
I am organizing a sprint for my local Python user group to try to port
(at least partially) a widely used module to P3k. (We're looking at
Mutagen right now.)
If this goes well, or at the very least, if it turns out I don't
completely suck at the porting process, I'd be happy to help start
portin
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:45 -0700, Smartboy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I came across the PyGObject bindings today through the fedora mail
> which was linked to on this list, and since have been wondering why it
> isn't mentioned anywhere else. I think that a notice should be put
> somewhere on the PyGTK
Hello,
I came across the PyGObject bindings today through the fedora mail
which was linked to on this list, and since have been wondering why it
isn't mentioned anywhere else. I think that a notice should be put
somewhere on the PyGTK site that there are now PyGObject bindings for
GTK which can b
