Thanks to everyone who works on pyinstaller!
The installation instructions for a package I work with are:
* install Python
* install Pipx
* pipx install package
So I had the idea that all 3 steps could be combined into a single
executable that just does this:
from pipx import main
Many applications these days can upgrade themselves in-place, or build on
operating system infrastructure to do so.
In the context of Python apps, I'm inclined to want to use pip/PyPi to
upgrade my app after deployment. But my impression from a previous
discussion is that pip and PyInstaller are
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:29 AM Steve Barnes wrote:
> Pyinstallers job isn't to install Python it is to create a file/folder
> with your code and enough of python for your code to run.
>
I did say at the beginning "I don’t think this is the use-case for
pyinstaller". I'm asking if people on the
Does there exist any easy way to install a totally sandboxed python
installation
* with all standard libraries,
* plus my app
* on Mac, windows and Linux?
* with a single installer?
I don’t think this is the use-case for pyinstaller but is there any tool in
the categorubthat makes it easy to
4/1/21 1:34 pm, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > Does there exist any easy way to install a totally sandboxed python
> > installation
> >
> > * with all standard libraries,
> > * plus my app
> > * on Mac, windows and Linux?
> > * with a single installe
Thanks for the reality check!
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:56 AM bwoodsend wrote:
> You're never going to run anything pip related from a PyInstaller app - I
> can think of a whole list of components which pip needs but PyInstaller
> intentionally strips down.
>
> --
> You received this message
