Starting a new thread as the other email will likely get buried...
I had a lengthy conversation with Anthony today about the layout and we
made a bunch of updates to the wiki doc.
Everyone should take a look and provide feedback:
https://github.com/pyjs/pyjs/wiki/The-Grand-Schism
I will try to e
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 16:44 -0700, Glyph wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Lex Berezhny wrote:
>
> > Any objections, thoughts or alternate volunteers?
>
> My only objection to this large volume of code-moving is that PyJS's
> test suite is quite fragile, and does not appear to be running in
On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Lex Berezhny wrote:
> Any objections, thoughts or alternate volunteers?
My only objection to this large volume of code-moving is that PyJS's test suite
is quite fragile, and does not appear to be running in CI anywhere. I think a
better first step toward this woul
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 15:31 -0400, Lex Berezhny wrote:
> I did a quick perusal of the pyjs wiki and found some old plans we put
> together to move the project forward.
>
>
> Most interesting one related to a re-factoring was this one:
>
>
> https://github.com/pyjs/pyjs/wiki/The-Grand-Schism
>
I did a quick perusal of the pyjs wiki and found some old plans we put
together to move the project forward.
Most interesting one related to a re-factoring was this one:
https://github.com/pyjs/pyjs/wiki/The-Grand-Schism
That one still looks good to me. I'm willing to volunteer to implement some
