On Sep 10, 2007, at 9:24 PM, JP wrote:
For a plugin, you'd implement begin() and put the initialization code
there. Either way, the init code will run before any discovery/
imports. I can elaborate on the plugin solution a bit tomorrow if
there's any interest. For the moment, though, I must go
On Sep 11, 12:53 am, Philip Jenvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:13 PM, JP wrote:
We actually removed the = 0.10.0 requirement for Pylons 0.9.6's
release, so Pylons users are probably getting the latest beta
installed. Unfortunately setuptools doesn't have a way of
On Sep 2, 1:32 pm, Philip Jenvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote:
nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to
compatible with it?
Have you tried b1 with Pylons? Does it work well?
The first alpha release was pretty
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:13 PM, JP wrote:
I'd recommend sticking with a requirement of = 0.9.9 until nose
0.10.0 final is out. The pre-releases are pre-releases because ...
well, you know. :)
But I'd also ask, if you find a (pre- or otherwise) release of nose is
buggy, please report those bugs! I
On Sep 10, 7:12 pm, Ben Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:13 PM, JP wrote:
I'd recommend sticking with a requirement of = 0.9.9 until nose
0.10.0 final is out. The pre-releases are pre-releases because ...
well, you know. :)
But I'd also ask, if you find a (pre- or
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:13 PM, JP wrote:
I'd recommend sticking with a requirement of = 0.9.9 until nose
0.10.0 final is out. The pre-releases are pre-releases because ...
well, you know. :)
But I'd also ask, if you find a (pre- or otherwise) release of nose is
buggy, please report those
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote:
nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to
compatible with it?
Have you tried b1 with Pylons? Does it work well?
The first alpha release was pretty buggy, and wasn't working with a
fairly basic Pylons project
On 9/3/07, Philip Jenvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote:
nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to
compatible with it?
Have you tried b1 with Pylons? Does it work well?
After removing =nose-0.9.9 from
nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to
compatible with it?
--
Qiangning Hong
http://www.douban.com/people/hongqn/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss
