We've closed the poll. Thanks to everyone who participated!
The result wasn't quite what I was hoping for ;-) The clear winners are
"protein" and "nucleic". But I also got direct feedback that adding "protein"
as a keyword would introduce backwards incompatibility with exiting workflows,
where
Hi Wolfram,
That reminds me that I compiled a (very incomplete) selection language
comparison table a long time ago. Finally managed to upload it to the PyMOLWiki:
https://pymolwiki.org/index.php/Selection_Language_Comparison
Phenix's and PyMOL's language are actually pretty close.
Cheers,
T
Speaking of atom selection, I wonder how many pymol and phenix users would
benefit from a fully "standardized" selection syntax. Would this be a
worthwhile design goal?
Wolfram Tempel
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Holder <
thomas.hol...@schrodinger.com> wrote:
> We'd like to know your t
We'd like to know your thoughts!
How should we name the new selectors for protein and nucleic acid?
Link to poll:
https://goo.gl/forms/r0Ck03VTytZQxN4A2
We will enhance the PyMOL selection language by adding a new selector for
protein, and a new one for nucleic acid. They will be subsets of the