Hi Humayun,
Yes, then you seem to be left with docking as the only option. There
are servers for that too, but since you want to do six-body docking,
you may need to contact somebody for assistance/guidance.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:11 PM, humayun scherrif hum@gmail.com
Docking is very non-reliable.
E. Krissinel (2009). /Crystal contacts as nature's docking solutions/.
J. Comp. Chem., in press; published on-line 6 May 2009; DOI
10.1002/jcc.21303
Maia
humayun scherrif wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for detailed explanation, surely it is helping me to sort
out
But maybe you can have a try: HADDOCK seems to give good results, once you
have defined the symmetry of your complex...
See:
Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010
'Building macromolecular assemblies by information-driven docking:
introducing the HADDOCK multi-body docking server' Karaca E. et al.
Cheers,
Thank you all and certainly seems llike now I am going to some right
direction.
I have read some discussion part (page 14) of the paper Maia sent, as stated
below, the BSA ( value for my dimer interfaces are ~1000 (as predicted by
PISA) which according to the Krissinel paper, is biological
Hi Jason,
nice. I didn't know about the pseudoatoms, very cool.
nick
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:39, Jason Vertrees
jason.vertr...@schrodinger.com wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Cool idea. First the witihin operator works on more than just
single atoms. So, how about something like this:
# fetch
