Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

FWIW we are using quite a bit of the internal api. My plan was to go over this once we cut over to the new warehouse uris. Of note might be the fact that pip-tools is a core dependency we bundle in pipenv and the current maintainer is a pipenv maintainer as well. For our specific case we have

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 15 April 2018 at 07:31, Donald Stufft wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2018, at 4:57 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Is the suggestion to use the `_internal` import, or carry a copy of > the pep425tags code myself, that I have to keep up to date with the >

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

> On Apr 14, 2018, at 4:57 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Is the suggestion to use the `_internal` import, or carry a copy of > the pep425tags code myself, that I have to keep up to date with the > internal pip copy? That would also involve me copying the `glibc` > part

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

Hi, On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Elvis Stansvik wrote: > 2017-10-21 14:34 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore : >> On 21 October 2017 at 12:15, Nick Coghlan wrote: >>> (Note: this is entirely speculative, and I have no idea how hard it

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

> On Oct 21, 2017, at 10:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > However, none of that impacts the question of whether `pip.main()` runs code > in the current process or implicitly runs it in a subprocess - `pip` doesn't > import the modules it installs either way, so it will all

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 22 October 2017 at 04:03, xoviat wrote: > Nick: > > That's generally a good idea, but one significant problem that can occur > is that the Python import system will cache certain libraries, people will > run "pip install," and then they will expect such libraries to be >

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 21 October 2017 at 12:15, Nick Coghlan wrote: > (Note: this is entirely speculative, and I have no idea how hard it would > be, so please read it as the question it's intended to be) No problem - I don't know myself how hard some of this would be, either ;-) > Do you know

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 21 October 2017 at 20:03, Paul Moore wrote: > Likely the biggest problems will be for people who call into the pip > resolver and build APIs, as I don't know of any alternatives out > there. But they were *definitely* breaking anyway, as we've made major > changes to that

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

While I understand that pip itself has to be very careful about edge cases and all the pathological things you can do in setup.py, as a higher-level tooling author my priorities are on the happy path UX and speed is a big factor there. So yes, using PackageFinder is potentially inaccurate, but

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 20 October 2017 at 14:26, Matthew Brett wrote: >> Thanks for the heads-up. >> >> Will y'all be doing a PyPI pre-release so we can test with `pip >> install --pre -U pip`? > > We've not yet

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 20 October 2017 at 14:55, Jannis Gebauer wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up, Paul. > > I’m currently using `pip.get_installed_distributions` and as far as I can > see that has moved into `_internal`, too: >

Re: [Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal APIs

On 20 October 2017 at 14:26, Matthew Brett wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up. > > Will y'all be doing a PyPI pre-release so we can test with `pip > install --pre -U pip`? We've not yet decided on that. Traditionally I don't think we have done so, but I'm inclined to think