Re: [pypy-dev] Low level operations and ootypesystem

2006-03-30 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Antonio, On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:12:03PM +0200, Antonio Cuni wrote: The first doubt is about overflow-checked operations: I've noticed there are a number of checked operations that can never fail due to their semantic, such as int_lt_ovf or int_rshift_ovf: am I missing something or

[pypy-dev] List and string in ootypesystem

2006-03-30 Thread Antonio Cuni
Hi, I've spent last hours reading sources in the rpython directory, trying to deeper understand how lltypesystem and ootypesystem work: I've noticed that the low level representations of strings and lists are the same in both typesystem. My question is: is it a design choice or nobody has

Re: [pypy-dev] List and string in ootypesystem

2006-03-30 Thread Niklaus Haldimann
Hi Antonio Antonio Cuni wrote: I've spent last hours reading sources in the rpython directory, trying to deeper understand how lltypesystem and ootypesystem work: I've noticed that the low level representations of strings and lists are the same in both typesystem. My question is: is it a

[pypy-dev] missed syncmeeting

2006-03-30 Thread Christian Tismer
Hi friends, I tried to get upat 6am, but didn't get my wakeup-call. Sorry, I really tried. May I just emit this: DONE: basic wrapping of RPython classes,one-way NEXT: finalizing, wrapper caching, two-way interface BLOCK: rtyping is hard to understand for special cases like this. I'm