On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Roger Flores wrote:
> Amaury wrote:
>>Surely we could have another copy with the largeadressaware flag?
>
> I agree. That's a smart way to proceed for now.
>
>
> I'm still wondering if there is any technical reason against the flag?
> Particularly the "CFFI extens
Hi Roger,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Roger Flores wrote:
> I'm still wondering if there is any technical reason against the flag?
> Particularly the "CFFI extensions want the high bit reserved or not" issue.
Obviously CFFI doesn't store random stuff in the high bit. It's meant
to work on
Amaury wrote:
>Surely we could have another copy with the largeadressaware flag?
I agree. That's a smart way to proceed for now.
I'm still wondering if there is any technical reason against the flag?
Particularly the "CFFI extensions want the high bit reserved or not" issue.
Matt wrote:
Hi Amaury,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
wrote:
> In the nightly distribution, pypy.exe is only 7kb.
> Surely we could have another copy with the largeadressaware flag?
+1 Great idea.
Armin
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@py
2013/4/6 matti picus
> I would vote -1 for adding the largeaddressaware
> flag to our translation proccess for nightlies. Better to run out of
> memory than to use cffi to call some random dll andhave it explode. Those
> who are in the know will have a compiler or can down load a free version
> a
We started a 64 bit windows port once, but it died from lack of
interest. The port is complicated since on windows 64 bit,/longs/are
only 32 bit. This is a problem for/PyPy/right now, since it assumes that
a c/long/can hold a pointer
Can you ship a largeaddressaware exe with your code, or even b
From: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
To: matti picus
Cc: Roger Flores ; PyPy Developer Mailing List
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] 2GB Limit on Windows
2013/4/6 matti picus
I was under the impression that that link flag can cause problems for
I would vote -1 for adding the largeaddressaware
flag to our translation proccess for nightlies. Better to run out of memory
than to use cffi to call some random dll andhave it explode. Those who are
in the know will have a compiler or can down load a free version and DIY.
Matti
On Apr 6, 2013 5:3
2013/4/6 matti picus
> I was under the impression that that link flag can cause problems for 32
> bit systems, but maybe we don't care? For instance see this
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5185406/how-does-the-large-address-aware-flag-work-for-32-bit-applications-on-64-bit-com.
> Why is it
I was under the impression that that link flag can cause problems for 32
bit systems, but maybe we don't care? For instance see this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5185406/how-does-the-large-address-aware-flag-work-for-32-bit-applications-on-64-bit-com.
Why is it a problem for you to run editbi
Is the 2GB limit being lifted on the Windows nightlies? I ask because I keep
bumping, painfully, into it. I found this link:
http://doc.pypy.org/en/latest/windows.html#preping-windows-for-the-large-build
Googling more about "editbin /largeaddressaware"
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t4
11 matches
Mail list logo
