Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy-Performance versus various other VMs

2013-04-08 Thread Janzert
On 4/7/2013 7:30 AM, Dimitri Vorona wrote: Hi everyone, just wanted to bring to your attention this blog post: http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2013/04/06/performance-of-rust-and-dart-in-sudoku-solving/ . PyPy ist compared with various dynamic and static languages. While the perfomance is

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy-Performance versus various other VMs

2013-04-07 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
I think we score pretty good on this benchmark. Definitely the competition there is tough (v8, luajit are the only other dynamic lang implementations considered). There is a plan to improve on *such* code, but definitely our immediate plans are for more python-like workloads than number crunching.

Re: [pypy-dev] PyPy-Performance versus various other VMs

2013-04-07 Thread Alex Gaynor
The biggest problem with this benchmark is that it uses nested lists (read: memory indirections), whereas the other implementations (or at least the C one) uses flat storage. Alex On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Dimitri Vorona wrote: > Hi everyone, > > just wanted to bring to your attention thi

[pypy-dev] PyPy-Performance versus various other VMs

2013-04-07 Thread Dimitri Vorona
Hi everyone, just wanted to bring to your attention this blog post: http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2013/04/06/performance-of-rust-and-dart-in-sudoku-solving/ . PyPy ist compared with various dynamic and static languages. While the perfomance is still OK (within an order of magnitude of C),