cool, just ask me then :-) as I said it's get_int_value and a jitframe
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Maciej,
>
> We are not tracking history one by one. We are trying to fix test
> runner failures. And the current failure is a missing reference to
> fail_boxes_int. It i
Maciej,
We are not tracking history one by one. We are trying to fix test
runner failures. And the current failure is a missing reference to
fail_boxes_int. It is not obvious what replaced it by looking at the
current sources, so we are trying to investigate back to the source of
the change.
Than
Hi David.
Why are you tracking the history one by one? The fail_boxes_int etc.
is now living on a jitframe. There are direct tests for all of that, I
would suggest looking at those instead of history (so it's now called
get_int_value and accepts a jitframe)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:55 AM, David
Hi, David
Ivan and Andre from Unicamp and I are trying to update the ppc backend
to the current RPython internals API.
We're trying to understand the removal of fail_boxes_int, etc. from
the backends. It looks like this was done on the remove-globals-in-jit
branch. I guess we need to adapt all of
