On sab, 2008-12-13 at 00:49 +0100, David Boddie wrote:
> On Fri Dec 12 22:57:22 GMT 2008, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
>
> > Way out, I'm afraid. ~60% of QtCore symbols start with a "Q", and a
> > further ~21% start with a "q". That still leaves around 32 symbols
> > (16%) once you weed out __doc__ et
On ven, 2008-12-12 at 22:57 +, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> > On 12/12/2008 11:18 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Phil Thompson
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. G
On Saturday 13 December 2008, David Boddie wrote:
> > No, my proposal is dropping the leading Q and using a Qt namespace
> > that doesn't require loading all modules. That way does seem
> > particularly odd, though. Perhaps a less counter-intuitive method
> > would be something like
> >
> > from py
On Fri Dec 12 22:57:22 GMT 2008, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
> Way out, I'm afraid. ~60% of QtCore symbols start with a "Q", and a
> further ~21% start with a "q". That still leaves around 32 symbols
> (16%) once you weed out __doc__ etc. Some have ridiculously common
> names ("center", "flush", "bin
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> On 12/12/2008 11:18 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Phil Thompson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
When there was a discuss
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:18:41 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Phil Thompson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I
>> > proposed
On 12/12/2008 11:20 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Marcell Mars wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
do you want to do something like:
import PyQt4.QtCore as Qt
import PyQt4.QtGui also as Qt
Sort of. It's mai
On 12/12/2008 11:18 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Phil Thompson
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
wrote:
Hi all,
When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I
proposed changing the mechanism by which you refer
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Marcell Mars wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
>> Any thoughts on this?
>
> do you want to do something like:
>
> import PyQt4.QtCore as Qt
> import PyQt4.QtGui also as Qt
Sort of. It's mainly about the naming, but I envision it w
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Phil Thompson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I
> > proposed changing the mechanism by which you refer to symbols[1] .
> > Thus somethi
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul A. Giannaros wrote:
> Any thoughts on this?
do you want to do something like:
import PyQt4.QtCore as Qt
import PyQt4.QtGui also as Qt
:)
___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcom
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:51:00 +0200, "Nick Shaforostoff"
wrote:
> 2008/12/12 Phil Thompson :
>
>> A class in PyQt should have the same name as the class in Qt if at all
>> possible.
> ever tried
>
> from PyQt4.QtCore import *
> from PyQt4.QtGui import *
> from PyQt4.QtSql import *
>
> ?
Erm, ye
2008/12/12 Phil Thompson :
> A class in PyQt should have the same name as the class in Qt if at all
> possible.
ever tried
from PyQt4.QtCore import *
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
from PyQt4.QtSql import *
?
___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:56 +, "Paul A. Giannaros"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I
> proposed changing the mechanism by which you refer to symbols[1] .
> Thus something like "QtGui.QApplication" could be refered to as
> "Qt.Application"
Hi all,
When there was a discussion regarding PyQt wishes for Python 3.0 I
proposed changing the mechanism by which you refer to symbols[1] .
Thus something like "QtGui.QApplication" could be refered to as
"Qt.Application".
As Qt does not use namespaces itself, there would be no conflicts of
names
15 matches
Mail list logo