On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why are you saying this to the PyQt mailing list when this is dependent
> on the Linux distributers' side?
i think that when linux distributer's side fails it is easy to join
that side especially when it is in your intere
8, Marcell Mars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marcell Mars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PyQt] i kindly request for better support of PyQt4 on linux
> distributions...
> To: pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com
> Date: Monday, November 17, 2008, 7:53 PM
> i really like PyQ
KDE4 also has phonon libraries and they colide (?) with Qt4 phonon
libraries (which is odd, as we can have phonon in Qt and stand-alone
on Gentoo). AFAIK PyQt4 checks when compiling if there is a phonon
library so it should be able to build against standalone phonon (but
Ubuntu and others would hav
i really like PyQt4 with all of the features it brings to us. couple
of weeks ago i finished application with video playback and PyQt4
provided me great playground. for that particular set up (art
exhibition) it probably saved me at least 7-8 hours of work comparing
to other solutions i was thinkin
