OK, that shouldn't be a problem. Thanks for the help!
Anand
On May 21, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote:
> Anand Patil (el 2008-05-20 a les 22:54:10 +0100) va dir::
>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Then, if you h
Anand Patil (el 2008-05-20 a les 22:54:10 +0100) va dir::
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Then, if you have more than 4096
> > nodes, you should be careful not to place them all in the same group to
> > avoid performance problems with
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Then, if you have more than 4096
> nodes, you should be careful not to place them all in the same group to
> avoid performance problems with the object tree.
>
Do you mean 4096 leaf nodes, or 4096 nodes in gener
Anand Patil (el 2008-05-19 a les 17:48:24 +0100) va dir::
> I'd like to store a long sequence of python objects with pytables. The
> only things I know about the objects are:
>
> - Their memory footprint is dominated by a big numpy array, and
> - The attribute name of the big array for each obj
Hi all,
I'd like to store a long sequence of python objects with pytables. The
only things I know about the objects are:
- Their memory footprint is dominated by a big numpy array, and
- The attribute name of the big array for each object is the same;
it's x1.big_array, x2.big_array, etc.
I
