Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> P.S. Can people please remember to block commits that shouldn't be >> merged into 3.0? > > Can you remind me how to do that? Thanks. Certainly! Just run "svnmerge block -r [a revision]" [1] in your py3k working copy and th

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Bill Janssen
> P.S. Can people please remember to block commits that shouldn't be > merged into 3.0? Can you remind me how to do that? Thanks. Bill ___ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
P.S. Can people please remember to block commits that shouldn't be merged into 3.0? (Or even better, merge the ones you make that should.) I feel rather nervous deciding whether something should be merged or not when it's an edge case. -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in the process of doing the conversion. asyncore.py was no > problem, but asynchat.py relies heavily on the 2.x buffer() object > (specifically the slicing aspects thereof), which went away, to be > replaced by the s

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Josiah Carlson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Benjamin Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just merged a good chunk of the trunk -> py3k queue, but there are >> still some things to be dealt with: >> >> - bsddb It seesm bsddb stil

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Josiah Carlson
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just merged a good chunk of the trunk -> py3k queue, but there are > still some things to be dealt with: > > - bsddb It seesm bsddb still has yet to be ported to Py3k. See #2887. > > - The asyncore/asynchat patches. Jo

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Bill Janssen
> - SSL changes I've been maintaining the Lib/ssl.py, Lib/test/test_ssl.py and Modules/_ssl.c files separately for the two trees. I think the underlying changes in socket.py, and the IO subsystem, still make this a good idea, but I'm willing to be convinced differently. There's yet a third varia

Re: [Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just merged a good chunk of the trunk -> py3k queue, but there are > still some things to be dealt with: > > - bsddb It seesm bsddb still has yet to be ported to Py3k. See #2887. > > - The asyncore/asynchat patches. Jo

Re: [Python-3000] wrong md5 checksum

2008-07-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Marcin ‘Qrczak’ Kowalczyk wrote: 2008/7/2 "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm puzzled how this might have happened. Someone obviously did search & replace a5 -> b1, intended for Python version, but applied to m

Re: [Python-3000] wrong md5 checksum

2008-07-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
>> I'm puzzled how this might have happened. > > Someone obviously did search & replace a5 -> b1, intended for Python > version, but applied to md5 too. Ah, ok. Thanks for the explanation. That might have been me, as well :-( Regards, Martin ___ Pytho

Re: [Python-3000] wrong md5 checksum

2008-07-02 Thread Marcin ‘Qrczak’ Kowalczyk
2008/7/2 "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm puzzled how this might have happened. Someone obviously did search & replace a5 -> b1, intended for Python version, but applied to md5 too. -- Marcin Kowalczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ __

[Python-3000] to be merged

2008-07-02 Thread Benjamin Peterson
I just merged a good chunk of the trunk -> py3k queue, but there are still some things to be dealt with: - bsddb It seesm bsddb still has yet to be ported to Py3k. See #2887. - The asyncore/asynchat patches. Josiah, can you do this? - The Mac 4-way arch build. - The bin/hex/oct float things. (T

Re: [Python-3000] wrong md5 checksum

2008-07-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I downloaded the file with firefox on linux. My md5sum agrees with > yours. I'd say there is a typo on the downloads page as the chance of > an incorrect file with an md5sum which differs by only 2 bits is > astronomically small. I can confirm that the result that you all got is the correct on

Re: [Python-3000] wrong md5 checksum

2008-07-02 Thread Nick Craig-Wood
Paul Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the download page (http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.0/) for=20 > Python 3000 shows : > > 9119625244b17aa35ed94b655a2b2135 13491200 python-3.0b1.msi > > but I got > > 9119625244a57aa35ed94b655a2b2135 13491200 python-3.0b1.msi > > (44a

Re: [Python-3000] [Fwd: Re: PEP 3101 str.format() equivalent of '%#o/x/X'?]

2008-07-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Thanks Eric Smith for pinging me on this one - BAW] Original Message Subject: Re: [Python-3000] PEP 3101 str.format() equivalent of '%#o/ x/X'? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:14:18 -0700 From: Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: