On 2008-09-10 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> mal> Besides, what's so bad with downloading and installing a package
> mal> from PyPI ?
>
> Nothing, I do it all the time. But my impression is that when an external
> module moves into the core it frequently undergoes some type of name cha
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 2008-09-10 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> mal> Besides, what's so bad with downloading and installing a package
>> mal> from PyPI ?
>>
>> Nothing, I do it all the time. But my impression is that when an external
>> module moves into the core it frequently unde
On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:23 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
I actually find it helpful to have the PyPI packages that ended up in
the stdlib use different names, since that opens up the possibility
to use the more current releases from PyPI in an application.
I'm with Marc-Andre on this; using the same
2008/9/10 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 5:23 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> I actually find it helpful to have the PyPI packages that ended up in
>> the stdlib use different names, since that opens up the possibility
>> to use the more current releases from PyPI in an applicati
