On 10/04/07, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Here's that I think might not need a PEP:
* Eliminate implicit string concatenation: "abc" "def"
in favor of an explicit + operation. That simplifies
the grammar just a bit and the compiler already is
smart enough to do consta
I had another idea on this theme.. going by unicode and raw string literals,
how about
s[1, 2, 3, 4]
for a set?
Eoghan
On 17/04/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DillonCo wrote:
> Why not use "<>" for sets?
Some possible reasons:
* It would look ugly
* There could be visual confusi
s[1] being a list index of the list 's'
s[1,] being a set literal with one element, '1'
On 17/04/07, Eoghan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had another idea on this theme.. going by unicode and raw string
literals, how about
s[1, 2, 3, 4]
for a set?
Eoghan
On 17
