Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Clarified the issue heading a bit, and cc'ed in the main Debian/Ubuntu folks.
Matthias, Barry - the attached patch here is aimed at making PEP 476 a bit more
distro friendly by moving the opt out to a configuration file rather than
requiring monkeypatching in
Zachary Ware added the comment:
Either by accident or by design the main build will run in addition.
By design; I intended get_externals.bat to be run explicitly if you just
wanted to pull the externals.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
R. David Murray added the comment:
I do not understand why the vendors want to re-introduce a security hole.
I understand that it causes issues using legacy software to communicate with
sites that don't verify, but I think that the correct solution to this is
disabling verification on a
Stefan Krah added the comment:
There's a comment in _posixsubprocess:
NetBSD and OpenBSD have a /proc fs available (though not necessarily
mounted) and do not have fdescfs for /dev/fd.
Is this still valid?
--
nosy: +skrah
___
Python tracker
Changes by Stefan Krah ste...@bytereef.org:
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23852
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Steve Dower added the comment:
I responded to Victor's suggestion about _Py_open instead of _open, but on
rereading I see that it also handles EINTR.
AFAICT (from https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5814770t.aspx, mainly),
Windows isn't ever going to return EINTR from the CRT. I don't
Steve Dower added the comment:
Victor - can you take a look? I'm keen to get this out of my patch queue :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23524
___
Cédric Krier added the comment:
At least on OpenBSD procfs have been removed:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20140908
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23852
___
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
