[issue3629] Python won't compile a regex that compiles with 2.5.2 and 30b2
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Patch seems okay and passes regrtest, although I have to admit I am not intimately familiar with sre or the new validator. -- nosy: +brett.cannon ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3629 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3820] Python 3.0b3 doesn't start on German Win XP SP3/SP2
Tim Pietzcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks a lot, now it works! The download link is http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9b2da534-3e03-4391-8a4d-074b9f2bc1bf in case someone else needs it. Best regards, Tim ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3820 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3807] _multiprocessing build fails when configure --without-threads
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- keywords: +needs review versions: +Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3807 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The patch looks fine to me (assuming that I didn't miss something critical hidden among the large table diffs). (I'd probably named the NODELTA flag after what it is rather than what it isn't, but I cannot think of a short replacement right now, so let's leave it as it is.) ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3766] socket.socket.recv broken (unbearably slow)
Thorben Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
As promised, here is the profiler output for a Mac (thanks Stefan). The
problem does NOT occur here, which should help greatly in tracking down
the cause in the socket library. Anyone into this?
$ python runme.py
500 packets @ 2 tokens each (500 very short lists)
0.0814669132233
14508 function calls in 0.082 CPU seconds
Ordered by: internal time
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
15000.0480.0000.0480.000 {method 'recv' of
'_socket.socket' objects}
15000.0150.0000.0150.000 string:1(sendall)
15000.0030.0000.0210.000 Client.py:8(send_int)
15000.0030.0000.0530.000 Client.py:16(read_int)
5000.0030.0000.0570.000 Client.py:19(read_int_list)
15000.0020.0000.0020.000 struct.py:77(unpack)
15000.0020.0000.0020.000 struct.py:54(pack)
5000.0010.0000.0220.000 Client.py:11(send_int_list)
10.0010.0010.0820.082 runme.py:12(bench)
10000.0010.0000.0010.000 {method 'insert' of 'list'
objects}
10010.0010.0000.0010.000 {range}
5000.0010.0000.0800.000 Client.py:28(spam)
15000.0000.0000.0000.000 {method 'unpack' of
'Struct' objects}
5010.0000.0000.0000.000 {len}
1 packet @ 5 tokens (1 very long list)
5.20953297615
400018 function calls in 5.210 CPU seconds
Ordered by: internal time
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
500012.2670.0002.2670.000 string:1(sendall)
500011.2630.0001.2630.000 {method 'recv' of
'_socket.socket' objects}
51.1120.0001.1120.000 {method 'insert' of 'list'
objects}
500010.1370.0001.4900.000 Client.py:16(read_int)
500010.1340.0002.4780.000 Client.py:8(send_int)
10.0820.0822.6852.685 Client.py:19(read_int_list)
500010.0770.0000.0770.000 struct.py:54(pack)
500010.0730.0000.0890.000 struct.py:77(unpack)
10.0440.0442.5222.522 Client.py:11(send_int_list)
500010.0160.0000.0160.000 {method 'unpack' of
'Struct' objects}
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3766
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3629] Python won't compile a regex that compiles with 2.5.2 and 30b2
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I came to the same conclusion: the 'skip' value is relative to the previous code, so it is necessary to adjust the target position. The patch is OK for me. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3629 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3743] PY_FORMAT_SIZE_T is not for PyString_FromFormat
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Jumping to release blocker, since it causes a buildbot to fail. Review needed. -- priority: - release blocker ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3743 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Reviewed the patch: looks fine to me. One nit: the unicodedata module doc-string must be updated to 5.1.0 as well. Ditto for the documentation. -- nosy: +lemburg ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3821] trace module bug when using --missing
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This can be further simplified: line_increments = code.co_lnotab[1::2] Assigning to myself, I will try to add unit tests as well. the trace module is not tested at all... -- assignee: - amaury.forgeotdarc nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc priority: - critical ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3821 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3781] warnings.catch_warnings fails gracelessly when recording warnings but no warnings are emitted
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Not quite that basic for the warnings.catch_warnings() part. I plan to leave the current warnings.catch_warnings() alone (aside from adding some re-entrancy checks), and add back a test.test_support.check_warnings() that uses a WarningsRecorder object to simplify the specific use cases in the Python regression test suite (i.e. at least adding back the easy attribute access, and possibly other things if there are other common features of the way we use it in the tests). The patch will make it clearer (working on that now). ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3825] Major reworking of Python 2.5.2 re module
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The correct link is #2636. Is it the same work? -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3825 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1424152] urllib/urllib2: HTTPS over (Squid) Proxy fails
Christian Kassab [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Python 2.4.3 also doesn't support ssl and a proxy to be used at the same time in CentOS 5.1. This file addresses the issues. It has been tested by using YUM to access a repository through a proxy using ssl client certificates. YUM itself needed to be patched to allow for client certs to be used... that change is on its way upstream. Thanks to all the other guys here for supplying the first patches! -- nosy: +ckassab versions: +Python 2.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11454/issue1424152-py24.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1424152 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Simon Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've dug around in the code a bit and the keyfile, certfile and ca_certs filename arguments to SSLSocket.__init__ are passed down into newPySSLObject in _ssl.c and from there directly to SSL_CTX_* function from OpenSSL so making these arguments allow file-like objects is going to be non-trivial. The options I see are: * Write the file-like objects out to named temporary files and pass those through to OpenSSL (seems like a nasty hack and prone to all sorts of problems). * Change the which OpenSSL functions are used to setup the certificate (I definitely don't think this could go into 2.6 or 3.0 at this stage; also see analysis of current OpenSSL usage below for more difficulties) * Add an SSL CTX wrapper object and allow that to be passed down to newPySSLObject instead of the filenames. Then the CTX object could be created before dropping privileges (I think this is probably also too big a change to be considered for 2.6 or 3.0 at this point, but it's what looks best to me at the moment). The current situation in _ssl.c: * keyfile is loaded using SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file(...) which loads the first certificate from keyfile into ctx. We could replace this with SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey(SSL_CTX *ctx, EVP_PKEY *pkey) but we'd have to load the key ourselves and make sure to follow what OpenSSL does to maintain compatibility. * certfile is loaded with SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file(...) which reads in all the certificates from certfile into ctx. We could read the certificates in ourselves and them load them one by one using SSL_CTX_use_certificate(...) and then SSL_CTX_add_extra_chain_cert(...). * ca_certs is loaded using SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(...). As fasr as I can see there is no convenient replacement function for this in OpenSSL. SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(...) will load a list of certificate names but doesn't load the certificates themselves (so verification won't be done with them) and SSL_CTX_add_client_CA(...) has the same issue. One could use SSL_CTX_set_cert_store(...) to register callbacks (and then presumably one can do whatever one wants and can get around the ca_certs issue) but the man page for SSL_CTX_set_cert_store has the rather disheartening Currently no detailed documentation on how to use the X509_STORE object is available. All this comes with the proviso that I just started digging into the OpenSSL manpages today so I'm a long way from being an expert. :) I can probably find time to create a patch with tests once we have a clear direction to go in. @Forest: If you have an details on how non-Python servers go about loading certificates and then dropping privileges using OpenSSL, that would be extremely useful. -- nosy: +hodgestar ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1606092] csv module broken for unicode
Mike Statkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Example of UnicodeWriter.writerow(self,row) presented in Python 2.5 Manual at section 9.1.5 (Examples on CSV module of standard library) does not correctly process rows containing not only strings, but also int type values, raising an attribute error. 1st line of code in UnicodeWriter.writerow: self.writer.writerow([s.encode(utf-8) for s in row]) tries to call .encode() method for s, that might be an int, not a string. A simple workaround is: self.writer.writerow([unicode(s).encode(utf-8) for s in row]) -- nosy: +mstatkus ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1606092 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3617] Add MS EULA to the list of third-party licenses in the Windows installer
Changes by Travis N. Vaught [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +tvaught ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3617 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3824] test_tarfile fails on cygwin (unicode decode error)
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sorry, probably I saw illusion... If uses cp932 codec, still test_tarfile.py reports error. :-( == ERROR: test_tar_size (__main__.WriteTest) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File test_tarfile.py, line 570, in test_tar_size tar.add(path) File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 1953, in add self.addfile(tarinfo, f) File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 1976, in addfile buf = tarinfo.tobuf(self.format, self.encoding, self.errors) File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 987, in tobuf return self.create_gnu_header(info, encoding, errors) File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 1018, in create_ gnu_header return buf + self._create_header(info, GNU_FORMAT, encoding, errors) File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 1107, in _create _header stn(info.get(gname, root), 32, encoding, errors), File /home/WhiteRabbit/python-dev/py3k/Lib/tarfile.py, line 177, in stn s = s.encode(encoding, errors) UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 0-3: ordin al not in range(128) ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3824 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3807] _multiprocessing build fails when configure --without-threads
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch is not easy to read, but if it can be summarized to:
if sysconfig.get_config_var('WITH_THREAD'):
build the _multiprocessing extension
else:
missing.append('_multiprocessing')
then this makes sense - it seems that the multiprocessing module is
completely unusable if python cannot use threads. Even at the python
level, it uses import threading in many places.
This need another review, though. Raising issue to ReleaseBlocker.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
priority: - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3807
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3824] test_tarfile fails on cygwin (unicode decode error)
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Is PyUnicode_DecodeMBCS available on cygwin? I get compilation errors when I try your patch. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3824 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3824] test_tarfile fails on cygwin (unicode decode error)
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Yes, when I did it last night, I thought I could compile it and saw OK on test_tarfile.py, but probably I dreamed. :-( #define PyUnicode_FromString(s) PyUnicode_Decode(s, strlen(s), cp932, strict) or following patch should work. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11455/experimental_mbcstowcs_codec.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3824 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3828] Bound methods compare 'successfully' with ints
New submission from Andreas Kloeckner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Check out this transcript: 8 --- Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Aug 8 2008, 09:22:44) [GCC 4.3.1] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. class A(object): ... def b(self): ... pass ... a = A() a.b 0 False 8 --- I would argue that the 'successful' comparison of a bound method with an int is undesirable. This especially bad when you're refactoring a class property into a class method and the property used to get used in comparisons. Instead of the expected exceptions, you get weird behavior. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 72961 nosy: inducer severity: normal status: open title: Bound methods compare 'successfully' with ints type: behavior versions: Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3828 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I have now committed the change as r66362 (including the missing documentation updates), and ported it to 3.0 as r66363 (where I had to change the flag value and regenerate the data, as the flag 0x100 was already taken). -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3799] Byte/string inconsistencies between different dbm modules
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think this isn't quite right. Ideally a fix should maintain several important properties: (1) Be able to read databases written by Python 2.x. (1a) Write databases readable by Python 2.x. (2) Use the same mapping between str and bytes as the other *dbm libraries have. (2a) Return the same value for keys() as the other *dbm libraries (except for order). I think (2) means that we should use UTF-8 to convert str keys to bytes, but (1) means we should use Latin-1 to convert keys to str *upon writing the index*. This will also satisfy (1a). The keys maintained internally should be kept in bytes to satsfy (2a). PS. I noticed the dbm module still returns bytearrays for keys and values. Is there a bug open to change those to bytes? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3799 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3629] Python won't compile a regex that compiles with 2.5.2 and 30b2
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Submitted as r66364. I'll merge into 3.0 as well (it's clean merge). -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3629 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3825] Major reworking of Python 2.5.2 re module
Matthew Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This is different work from a different author than #2636. I've submitted what I've done so far in case my computer gets hit by a bus. :-) I still have more work to do on it, so I'm not concerned that it might not get any attention for a while. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3825 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3828] Bound methods compare 'successfully' with ints
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: You are right. And thanks to the time machine, python 3.0 already forbid such comparisons: a.b 0 Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module TypeError: unorderable types: method() int() The behaviour cannot change for the 2.x series, though - it would break backward compatibility. python2.6 however has a -3 option that prints a warning in this case: a.b 0 __main__:1: DeprecationWarning: comparing unequal types not supported in 3.x -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc resolution: - works for me status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3828 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3781] warnings.catch_warnings fails gracelessly when recording warnings but no warnings are emitted
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Cleanup patch now attached. Details of changes: - warnings.catch_warnings() now has reentry guards (and associated tests) to prevent silent errors when misused - added back a test_support.check_warnings() convenience wrapper (deliberately changing the name to be different from the context manager in the warnings module). This wrapper is no longer configurable - it is now used solely for tests that want to record normal warnings and check the results. - restored the w.reset() calls that went away in the previous checkin - unit tests that want to test a different module, or don't want warnings recorded now consistently use warnings.catch_warnings() directly - cleanups up to the respective documentation - cleanups to test_py3kwarn so it is better behaved when other tests are run before it (the lack of reinitialisation of extension modules still causes problems though) - tested with ./python -3 -m test.regrtest -uall -x test_ossaudiodev (exclusion is needed because test_ossaudiodev hasn't worked properly on my machine in a very long time - the audio file playback runs overtime and I've never found the time to figure out why) Just needs a review and then should be good to go. -- keywords: +needs review -patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11456/issue3781_catch_warnings_cleanup.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3642] Objects/obmalloc.c:529: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Here is my attempt for a patch (obmalloc.diff). Please review. -- keywords: +needs review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11457/obmalloc.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3642 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3743] PY_FORMAT_SIZE_T is not for PyString_FromFormat
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The patch is fine, please apply. -- assignee: - amaury.forgeotdarc keywords: -needs review nosy: +loewis resolution: - accepted ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3743 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2876] Write UserDict fixer for 2to3
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I still don't see why this is a release blocker. Adding a 2to3 fixer certainly isn't a release blocker - if the fixer isn't available, users would need to manually fix the code. Adding a Py3k warning shouldn't be a release blocker, either - I think such warnings could get added in 2.6.1 also (as they are only issued if you invoke Python with -3). Tentatively lowering the priority to normal. -- nosy: +loewis priority: release blocker - normal ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2876 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3807] _multiprocessing build fails when configure --without-threads
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Why is this a release blocker? If you configure without threads, you get a few ugly compiler messages, but Python still builds exactly the same way as without this patch, right? So if the patch doesn't make it into 2.6, it can still be applied in 2.6.1 (as it is a clear bugfix). Tentatively lowering priority to normal. As for reviewing it: indeed, it looks overly complicated (perhaps it would look nicer in Rietveld). As a last-minute change, I would prefer something that looks more along the lines of Amaury's fragment (i.e. trying to avoid changes to the indentation level). -- nosy: +loewis priority: release blocker - normal ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3807 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1868] threading.local doesn't free attrs when assigning thread exits
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: If Christian's analysis is right, and memory is released except for the last thread, I don't think this qualifies as a release blocker. Also (unless I misinterpret the issue), it seems that we have made many releases already which had this bug, so it's unclear why it should block the next release. Tentatively lowering the priority to high. -- nosy: +loewis priority: release blocker - high ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Changes by Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11458/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: 2008/9/10 Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have now committed the change as r66362 (including the missing documentation updates), and ported it to 3.0 as r66363 (where I had to change the flag value and regenerate the data, as the flag 0x100 was already taken). That's unfortunate -- perhaps the 2.6 flag and data can be brought in line, to make future merges easier? Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11458/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___2008/9/10 Martin v. Löwis lt;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt;:brgt; I have now committed the change as r66362 (including the missingbrgt; documentation updates), and ported it to 3.0 as r66363 (where I had tobr gt; change the flag value and regenerate the data, as the flag 0x100 wasbrgt; already taken).brbrThat#39;s unfortunate -- perhaps the 2.6 flag and data can be brought in line, to make future merges easier?brbr -- br--Guido van Rossum (home page: a href=http://www.python.org/~guido/;http://www.python.org/~guido//a)brbr ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3526] Customized malloc implementation on SunOS and AIX
Sébastien Sablé [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My previous patch has a small problem as I believed dlmalloc was always returning a non-NULL value, even when asking for 0 bytes. It turns out not to be the case, so here is a new patch (patch_dlmalloc3.diff) which must be applied after the previous one (patch_dlmalloc2.diff) to correct this problem. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11459/patch_dlmalloc3.diff ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3526 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, Simon. I remember digging through all this last year, and finally deciding to keep things simple and use the strategy the current codebase uses. It almost sounds like we'd need to create Key and Certificate objects in the _ssl module, which could be used to load up all the keys and/or certificates the server uses, before it changes UID (and presumbably loses access to the files the data is kept in). I was resisting going down that path; there's a lot of complexity there I want to avoid. But much of the mechanism of a Certificate object is already there; perhaps adding an opaque Key object wouldn't be too bad. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Jean-Paul Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Both M2Crypto and pyOpenSSL expose certificate and key objects and have seen lots of real-world use. Following their lead would be sensible. -- nosy: +exarkun ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3756] re.escape() does not work with bytes()
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Looks fine, except I used frozenset for the _alphanum* variables and reverted to double quotes like the rest of the file. Submitted as r66366. -- assignee: - gvanrossum resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3756 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: That's unfortunate -- perhaps the 2.6 flag and data can be brought in line, to make future merges easier? I thought of that, however, merging the databases themselves would still not be possible: the 3.0 database has the flags set in many records, which causes merge conflicts (as the 2.x database has different flag values). So regenerating the database is necessary, anyway. In future changes, it might be useful to have new flags with the same values, so that such patches can be merged without conflicts in the generator. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3826] Self-reference in BaseHTTPRequestHandler descendants causes stuck connections
romkyns [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: My initial description doesn't state the actual observable problem very clearly: the problem is that the browser gets stuck instead of displaying the page, writing something along the lines of Transferring data from localhost. After many seconds it times out. Aborting the request in Firefox causes the page to be displayed. Also forgot to mention that it's possible to work around this by explicitly removing all circular references after the base class' __init__ method - so for the attached example a work-around is self.dummy = None as the last line of the __init__ method. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3826 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3829] Tuple comparison masking exception
New submission from Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There's a strange condition where cmp() of tuples of unorderable values returns -1 even though using the unorderable values raises an exception. If I have these two unorderable values, cmp() raises an expected exception: s0 = frozenset(['testing 0']) s1 = frozenset(['testing 1']) cmp(s0, s1) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? TypeError: cannot compare sets using cmp() Comparing tuples of the values returns -1: cmp((s0,), (s1,)) -1 Py3k does raise a TypeError, but the message is indecipherable: cmp((s0,), (s1,)) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module TypeError: unorderable types: 'tuple' != 'tuple' (The Py3k message for the set comparison is the same as for Python 2.) I believe that this is an error; the exception from the underlying item comparison should be propagated. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 72981 nosy: fdrake severity: normal status: open title: Tuple comparison masking exception type: behavior versions: Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3829 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Sure -- but the point of the SSL module was to do something small and compatible with the existing socket.ssl module; I really don't want to get into a full-fledged Python interface to OpenSSL. Perhaps incremental progress would be OK... ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Jean-Paul Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'm just suggesting that if the ssl module *is* going to gain certificate and key objects, looking at existing APIs and perhaps emulating them, to the extent that they provide functionality which the ssl module is also going to provide, is a good idea. Perhaps we could actually get the various APIs to begin to converge (where they overlap) instead of producing further divergence. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1868] threading.local doesn't free attrs when assigning thread exits
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Agreed, this is fine for a bugfix point release. I was initially concerned about the Modules/threadmodule.c struct localobject changing but that is private and used only by code within threadmodule.c so its not part of an API anything else could depend on. Changing it for 2.6.1/2.5.3/3.0.1 should be fine. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1868 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Jean-Paul Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: You can load a private key from a string by creating a memory BIO and using PEM_read_bio_PrivateKey or d2i_PrivateKey_bio. This is how pyOpenSSL implements its load_privatekey API. You can see the code here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~exarkun/pyopenssl/trunk/annotate/70?file_id=crypto.c-20080219014912-qyb7kjf196jhzlyv-128 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Daniel Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: #66363 breaks test_unicode and test_format on 3.0. -- nosy: +ajaksu2 versions: +Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3823] ssl.wrap_socket() is incompatible with servers that drop privileges, due to keyfile requirement
Forest Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Simon: I wish I could offer guidance here, but I'm afraid that I too am reading some of these openssl man pages for the first time. I agree that writing to a temporary file would be bad. Accepting file-like objects from python code would be nice, but isn't really necessary. Simple strings would suffice. It's easy enough for application code to read the strings from the appropriate files. Of course, the ssl module (or an underlying library) would need a way to determine the data format within the strings. Unfortunately, I didn't notice an equivalent of SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file() that accepts a file's contents instead of its path. SSL_CTX_use_RSAPrivateKey() looks like the next best thing. much of the mechanism of a Certificate object is already there; perhaps adding an opaque Key object wouldn't be too bad. That's encouraging. From the openssl docs I've read so far, it looks like certificates and keys have several formats and use patterns. That seems to me like another argument in favor of supporting separate Certificate and Key objects, even if they're only minimally implemented to begin with. In other words, I don't imagine the presence of Certificate and Key objects would muck up the ssl module's api. In order to keep compatibility with socket.ssl, perhaps any new certificate and key objects should be accepted as alternatives to the existing certfile and keyfile args, but the latter should still be allowed? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3823 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3827] memoryview.size is redundant
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Fixed in r66374. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3658] fix for pychecker property complaints
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I agree with Antoine, so I'm just going to close this as rejected. There's little benefit in it, but there is potential harm. -- resolution: - rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3658 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3743] PY_FORMAT_SIZE_T is not for PyString_FromFormat
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed r66377 and r66378. -- resolution: accepted - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3743 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3640] test_cpickle crash on AMD64 Windows build
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3640 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3830] Tarfile has incorrect USTAR VERSION field (should be 00; is 0 NUL)
New submission from SunriseProgrammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The 'tarfile' object make incorrect header blocks. There's a USTAR 'MAGIC' string that's supposed to be followed by a version; that version is supposed to be two '0' (digit zero -- ascii 48) chars with no NUL padding at all. Python 2.4.3 has it correct. Later versions (e.g., 2.5) are carefully making the field NUL terminated -- but that's wrong; they aren't supposed to be. File History: 'tarfile.py' was correct in version 41340 and incorrect in version 45954 -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 72993 nosy: SunriseProgrammer severity: normal status: open title: Tarfile has incorrect USTAR VERSION field (should be 00; is 0 NUL) type: behavior versions: Python 2.4, Python 2.5 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3830 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3830] Tarfile has incorrect USTAR VERSION field (should be 00; is 0 NUL)
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - lars.gustaebel nosy: +lars.gustaebel ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3830 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3642] Objects/obmalloc.c:529: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Patch looks good to me and Martin's analysis of the test being useless on a platform where size_t uint_t makes sense. -- keywords: -needs review ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3642 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3781] warnings.catch_warnings fails gracelessly when recording warnings but no warnings are emitted
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Code looks good. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3781 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3756] re.escape() does not work with bytes()
Andrew McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Looks fine, except I used frozenset for the _alphanum* variables and reverted to double quotes like the rest of the file. Submitted as r66366. All good. Thankyou. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3756 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Code point 0x0370 is now a printable character. r66381 corrected the failures by simply changing it to 0x0378, until the next unicodedata upgrade... I wonder if there is a value that is guaranteed to stay non-printable. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3821] trace module bug when using --missing
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Here is a simple test suite for the trace module, and two corrections to make it work. The test file is suitable for 2.6 (simply replace test.support with test.test_support) -- keywords: +needs review, patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11460/trace.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3821 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3827] memoryview.size is redundant
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This causes test_ctypes to fail. r66382 corrects the test to use len(v) instead of v.size -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3811] Update Unicode database to 5.1.0
Changes by Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11461/unnamed ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3811 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3831] Multiprocessing: Expose underlying pipe in queues
New submission from Steve Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Both Connection and Pipe objects expose their underlying file descriptors, which is useful for accessing them in an event-driven manner. However the higher-level Queue does not make the underlying pipe available; to get at them you must access private member attributes which is fragile. It would be good to have a well-defined API for accessing either the pipe objects or the underlying FDs. -- components: Extension Modules messages: 73001 nosy: TarkaSteve severity: normal status: open title: Multiprocessing: Expose underlying pipe in queues type: feature request versions: Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3831 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3831] Multiprocessing: Expose underlying pipe in queues
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +jnoller ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3831 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3833] python-2.6b3.msi and python-2.6b3.amd64.msi can't both be installed on one machine
New submission from Jimmy Retzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm seeing the same symptoms that are described in issue 1543 with the 2.6b3 MSIs. Namely, when you run one of the MSIs (either 32-bit or 64-bit) then the other will refuse to install. This is on XP Pro x64 SP2. python-3.0b3.msi and python-3.0b3.amd64.msi exhibit the same problem. Having 32-bit and 64-bit version coexist makes it much easier to build extensions for and test on both versions at the same time. -- components: Installation, Windows messages: 73003 nosy: jretz severity: normal status: open title: python-2.6b3.msi and python-2.6b3.amd64.msi can't both be installed on one machine type: feature request versions: Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3833 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3832] add force_shared Library option to create shared lib even with use_stub=False
vajda [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This bug can be closed. It moved to the setuptools issue tracker as issue 43. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3832 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
