Stefan Behnel added the comment:
BTW, the last two patches (int4 and redundant_property) are ready to be
applied. Anyone?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22464
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 646bc7d3544b by Georg Brandl in branch 'default':
#22464: Speed up common Fraction operations by special-casing several
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/646bc7d3544b
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Left this open in case you have additional patches coming.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22464
___
Erik Cederstrand added the comment:
I don't have the repo handy to make a patch against 3.5, but would an addition
like this do?
in Lib/_strptime.py:
+elif iso_week != -1 and iso_year == -1:
+raise ValueError('%Y' directive is ambiguous in combination with
'%V'. Use '%G'
New submission from Brian Gladman:
There is a discussion of this issue on comp.lang.python
The function known as 'the greatest common divisor' has a number of well
defined mathematical properties for both positive and negative integers (see,
for example, Elementary Number Theory by Kenneth
karl added the comment:
Ok my tests are ok.
→ ./python.exe -m unittest -v Lib/test/test_urllib2net.py
test_close (Lib.test.test_urllib2net.CloseSocketTest) ... ok
test_custom_headers (Lib.test.test_urllib2net.OtherNetworkTests) ... FAIL
test_file (Lib.test.test_urllib2net.OtherNetworkTests)
STINNER Victor added the comment:
See also issue #22464.
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22477
___
___
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
+1 from me.
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22477
___
___
Drekin added the comment:
I installed wish and tried the demos shipped with Python. The behavior occurs
during the demo basic editable text. So it's an issue of Tk itself. Actually
the same behavior occurs even in the wish shell.
--
___
Python
James Spurin added the comment:
I encountered similar issues to those discussed in this issue whilst compiling
3.4.1 on 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago)'
In particular, the following tests were failing -
[root@lonlx90800 ~]# /local/0/python-3.4.1/bin/python3
New submission from karl:
→ ./python.exe -V
Python 3.4.2rc1+
→ hg tip
changeset: 92532:6dcc96fa3970
tag: tip
parent: 92530:ad45c2707006
parent: 92531:8eb4eec8626c
user:Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
date:Mon Sep 22 22:44:21 2014 -0400
summary:
karl added the comment:
Opened issue #22478 for the tests failing. Not related to my modification.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5550
___
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
The current `gcd` definition is almost accidental, in that it just happens to
be what's convenient for use in normalisation in the Fraction type. If people
are using it as a standalone implementation of gcd, independent of the
fractions module, then defining
karl added the comment:
ok let's see
→ ./python.exe -m unittest -v
Lib.test.test_urllib2net.OtherNetworkTests.test_custom_headers
test_custom_headers (Lib.test.test_urllib2net.OtherNetworkTests) ... FAIL
==
FAIL:
Ned Deily added the comment:
OK, then if you want to pursue the issue, I'd suggest asking on one of the
Tcl/Tk forums (perhaps comp.lang.tcl) or Stackoverflow and/or checking the Tk
issue tracker (https://core.tcl.tk/tk/reportlist). Good luck!
--
resolution: - third party
stage: -
karl added the comment:
Ah! the User-Agent (or anything which is in unredirected_hdrs) will not be
updated if it has already been set once.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/064f6baeb6bd/Lib/urllib/request.py#l1154
headers = dict(request.unredirected_hdrs)
headers
{'User-agent':
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22478
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
gladman added the comment:
On 24/09/2014 08:58, Mark Dickinson wrote:
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
The current `gcd` definition is almost accidental, in that it just happens to
be what's convenient for use in normalisation in the Fraction type. If
people are using it as a
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22475
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22476
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22474
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22473
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
It's not a duplicate.
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18629
___
___
Berker Peksag added the comment:
This has been fixed in https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c8c11082bd0c.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: - out of date
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Quentin Pradet added the comment:
I've also been affected by this when testing integration with a third-party
library (NLTK). NLTK does need to be fixed, but the ResourceWarning already say
so.
The new one-liner doesn't seem contrived to me.
--
nosy: +Quentin.Pradet
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
I will willingly supply more references if you need them.
I don't. :-) I've taught more elementary number classes and reviewed more
elementary number theory texts (including Rosen's) than I care to remember, and
I have plenty of my own references. I stand by
New submission from Bekket McClane:
When I import the random module using import random in the command line, it
worked fine. But if I import it in the file, the program will throw a strange
error, but sometimes it just exit right away after the import statement with no
error. Moreover, if I
Senthil Kumaran added the comment:
I suspect that you have your interpreters confused. (For e.g, I see 3.4 run
against the trunk and the error messages are leading me to believe that 2.7
version in run on 3 code).
Or your local copy is not in right shape.
I tested it on 3.4 and cpython
Senthil Kumaran added the comment:
The buildbots are not showing this error too. I suggest you reset your local
copy with the pristine one from remote, do a make distclean; ./configure; make
and then run the tests.
--
assignee: - orsenthil
resolution: - works for me
stage: -
STINNER Victor added the comment:
It's not a bug in Python. The problem is that your project contains a file
called random.py which is used instead of the random from the standard
library. Rename the file (and remove random.pyc).
--
nosy: +haypo
resolution: - not a bug
status: open -
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 2058d94f32dd by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4':
Issue #21860: Correct docstrings of FileIO.seek() and FileIO.truncate() methods.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2058d94f32dd
New changeset de645efe6a9b by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Thanks for the patch, Terry.
--
assignee: haypo - berker.peksag
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - resolved
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset be2746c565c2 by Berker Peksag in branch '2.7':
Issue #21860: Correct docstrings of FileIO.seek() and FileIO.truncate() methods.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/be2746c565c2
--
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 7ea2153eae87 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4':
Issue #22427: TemporaryDirectory no longer attempts to clean up twice when
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7ea2153eae87
New changeset e9d4288c32de by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Issue
gladman added the comment:
On 24/09/2014 10:13, Mark Dickinson wrote:
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
I will willingly supply more references if you need them.
I don't. :-) I've taught more elementary number classes and reviewed more
elementary number theory texts (including
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Hmm, looks as I forgot to attach a patch.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36706/zipfile_add_dirs.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22219
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Committed without this test.
Thank you Victor and Yury for your comments.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Well we will just have to agree to disagree on this :-)
Sure. In the mean time, would you be interested in writing a patch targeting
Python 3.5? (Irrespective of the arguments about the definition, I don't think
this is a change that could be applied in a
New submission from chrysn:
the attached test.py snipplet, which runs an asyncio main loop to the
completion of a coroutine raising SystemExit, runs cleanly when invoked using
`python3 test.py`, but shows a logging error from the Task.__del__ method when
invoked using `python3 -m test`.
the
Changes by chrysn chr...@fsfe.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36707/test.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22480
___
___
Changes by chrysn chr...@fsfe.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36708/test.err
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22480
___
___
Changes by chrysn chr...@fsfe.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36709/destructortest.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22480
___
Stefan Champailler added the comment:
Thank you all for your quick and good answers. This level of responsiveness is
truly amazing.
I've played a bit with IPython and it works just fine. I can type the eurosign
drectly with Alt Gr - E (so I didn't enter a unicode code). So the bug is
gladman added the comment:
On 24/09/2014 11:54, Mark Dickinson wrote:
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
Well we will just have to agree to disagree on this :-)
Sure. In the mean time, would you be interested in writing a patch targeting
Python 3.5? (Irrespective of the arguments
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I suggest adding a new implementation instead of replacing the current function
in the fractions module. As Mark noted, the current gcd() is more of a
sideeffect of the fractions module, but there's no real need to change that. It
works perfectly ok for a) the
Akira Li added the comment:
Whether or not gcd(a, b) == gcd(|a|, |b|) depends on the definition if
we believe to Stepanov of C++ STL fame who mentions in his lecture [1]
[1] http://www.stepanovpapers.com/gcd.pdf
that the current implementation that uses two operation __bool__ and
__mod__:
Khalid added the comment:
I tried but I got this error this installation package could not be
opened. verify that the package exists that you can access it, or contact
the application vendor to verify that this is a valid windows installer
package (screen shot in the attachment)
by the way I'm
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 6d44906344f4 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.4':
Issue #16056: Rename test method in test_statistics to avoid conflict.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6d44906344f4
New changeset c49d7f4d1c04 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default':
Issue #16056:
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
I would be a lot more cautious about changing the gcd function. As Mark says,
there is *not* a single well-defined meaning of the gcd for negative arguments.
Even Wolfram can't decide which to use: Mathworld gives one interpretation,
Mathematica the
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
If we are considering adding a new gcd elsewhere (say, in the math module),
then it should accept any arbitrary number of arguments, not just two. (At
least one argument though.)
Also, Mathematica supports the GCD of rational numbers, not just integers.
Berker Peksag added the comment:
- issue 16079 opened for make patchcheck integration
- issue 19119 opened for test_heapq
- issue 19113 opened for test_functions
And here's a patch for 2.7.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
stage: needs patch - patch review
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5
Steven D'Aprano added the comment:
For future reference, we *strongly* recommend that instead of taking a screen
shot and posting it as an attachment, you copy and paste the text directly.
Don't retype it, any decent terminal application will allow you to select and
copy the text, then paste
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Aye, IPython has the advantage of running in a fully initialised browser, with
the backend in a fully initialised Python environment.
CPython's setting up the standard streams for the default REPL at a much lower
level, and there are quite a few problems with
New submission from Владимир Тырин:
This behavior seems to be very strange.
l = [1, 2, 3]
t = ('a', l)
t
('a', [1, 2, 3])
t[1] += [4]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
t
('a', [1, 2, 3, 4])
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
See
https://docs.python.org/3/faq/programming.html#why-does-a-tuple-i-item-raise-an-exception-when-the-addition-works
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
resolution: - not a bug
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I know that the 18.5.3. Tasks and coroutines section of the documentation is
probably the worst section :-( Feel free to suggest changes with a patch!
I started to enhance the documentation of the Task class, but there is still a
lot of work to enhance the
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +asyncio
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22474
___
___
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +asyncio
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22475
___
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
destroyed means collected by the garbage collector, when the last reference
the task objected was cleared. To be honest, I have no idea who keeps a
reference to tasks nor how the pending task destroyed bug occurs.
pending means that the execution of the
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22472
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
But that isn't quite true. It is the callback associated with the future that
is displaying the result and stopping the loop.
I wrote this example to show that setting the result of a future can schedule a
callback. I mean something like:
In this example,
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +asyncio
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22473
___
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Cool, the final code is simpler than before!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22427
___
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
The issue #22480 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22428
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Running python test.py and python -m test changes how the code is loaded.
With python test.py, test.py becomes the __main__ module, whereas python
-m test uses the test module.
At Python exit, the __main__ module and other modules are destroyed differently.
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +asyncio
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22476
___
___
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
assignee: - brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21052
___
___
Steve Dower added the comment:
Ah, okay, so this is due to the embedded DLL in the installer that we extract
and use to validate the install path (if you select a path that already exists,
you get a prompt warning you).
I don't know why your %TEMP% directory was not read/write/execute, but
New submission from Dom Zippilli:
In the logging module's config.py, see the _create_formatters(cp) method used
by the fileConfig() method. Note that it pulls format and datefmt and
submits these in the formatter constructor:
f = c(fs, dfs)
However, the Formatter constructor has a third
New submission from Stefan Krah:
The following URL contains copyrighted verbatim text from bytereef.org:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/m3-cdecimal
I'm not surprised, since the ongoing Walmartization of Open Source
has little regard for authors.
--
messages: 227461
nosy: skrah
Alex Gaynor added the comment:
This bug tracker isn't really the right place to track this -- that said I
don't know where is, so I've added Donald Stufft to the nosy list, hopefully he
can help direct this appropriately.
What license is the bytereef text available under? The cdecimal source
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +vinay.sajip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22482
___
___
Donald Stufft added the comment:
There's a support link on the left hand side of the PyPI page, that'll take you
to the support forum where you can issue a support request and it'll get dealt
with. Alternatively you can email distutils-...@python.org, or Richard and
Myself (first names
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I don't understand the issue.
I see two projects:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cdecimal
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/m3-cdecimal
The two projects have the same metadata except owner: cdecimal is owned by
skrah, m3-cdecimal is owned by prefer.
The license and
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Oh, the issue was closed while I was writing my message.
I agree with Alex and Donald, it's not the right place to report such issue.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22483
Wolfgang Maier added the comment:
Wouldn't it make more sense to change gcd() in the fractions module to return
only positive integers?
The current gcd could become _gcd for private use by fractions, and the new
wrapper gcd could just be implemented as:
def gcd(a,b):
return abs(_gcd(a,
Stefan Krah added the comment:
I don't see a license on PKG-INFO itself. Furthermore, even if
it is legal, it (again) shows an utter disregard for authors and
their stated preferences.
I'm not surprised though, given that even existing names are
reassigned in an autocratic fashion.
--
Alex Gaynor added the comment:
Stefan, this is not the right forum for this issue, please do not reopen it.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22483
___
Stefan Krah added the comment:
Sorry, Donald, the actions on PyPI deserve wider exposure.
--
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22483
___
Donald Stufft added the comment:
Sorry, Richard or myself (...) will take a look and fix it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22483
___
Donald Stufft added the comment:
This will be my last post on this issue.
I've given you the mechanisms for reporting problems with PyPI. PyPI is not run
by python-dev nor is the python-dev bug tracker a mouth piece for your
frustration with some part of the ecosystem around Python.
If you
Donald Stufft added the comment:
Since I've been asked, just to clarify, my last post was a continuation of a
sentence I mistakenly forgot to write out the whole thing.
It should read:
If you actually care about fixing the issue report it through one of the
venues that I've mentioned and
Stefan Krah added the comment:
Yeah right, obviously I don't *really* care about the issue (ethics
in open source software, in case you did not understand).
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22483
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
If nothing else, the doc for fractions.gcd Return the greatest common divisor
is wrong and should be changed. The negative of the greatest common divisor is
the least common divisor in an integer range. The doc should say Return the
greatest common divisor or
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Or Return a greatest magniture common divisor ..., there being two gmcds to
choose from.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22477
___
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
In this case, the issues are being caused by the following kernel parameters
that we have for our default build -
#
## TIBCO network tuning #
#
net.core.rmem_default = 33554432
Vinay Sajip added the comment:
While fileConfig() is not deprecated, I'm not planning to enhance it, as the
newer dictConfig() API offers better functionality overall. With dictConfig(),
you do have support for alternative formatting styles.
--
___
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
The negative of the greatest common divisor is the least common divisor in an
integer range.
That depends on your choice of definitions: it's perfectly reasonable to see it
as another greatest common divisor, if you interpret greatest as being with
respect
New submission from Berker Peksag:
The attached patch partly reverts
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/48033d90c61d#l2.126 since it breaks building
doc archives for RC versions:
- https://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2014-September/020211.html
-
New submission from Carol Willing:
As reported by a couple of users on the python-docs mailing list:
Python 3.4.2rc1 docs are giving a 404 Not Found when clicking on the links to
download (https://docs.python.org/3.4/download.html).
Python 3.5.0a0 links download docs correctly
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +larry, terry.reedy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22485
___
___
gladman added the comment:
On 24/09/2014 19:01, Mark Dickinson wrote:
Mark Dickinson added the comment:
The negative of the greatest common divisor is the least common divisor in
an integer range.
That depends on your choice of definitions: it's perfectly reasonable to see
it as
Berker Peksag added the comment:
Thanks for the report. This is a duplicate of issue 22484.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
resolution: - duplicate
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
superseder: - Build doc archives for RC versions
___
Python tracker
Carol Willing added the comment:
Thanks Berker. I'm glad it's being addressed and you have submitted a patch.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22485
___
R. David Murray added the comment:
Why would this not also be an issue for alpha/beta?
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22484
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here is other patch for 3.4. It is more than 10 times faster than initial patch
in worst case.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36712/re_ignore_case_range-3.4_2.patch
___
Python tracker
gladman added the comment:
On 24/09/2014 17:24, Wolfgang Maier wrote:
Wolfgang Maier added the comment:
[snip]
An aspect that hasn't really been discussed so far on the mailing list is
that this is *not* only about whether the gcd of negative integers should be
negative or positive, but
New submission from Stefan Behnel:
fractions.gcd() is required for normalising numerator and denominator of the
Fraction data type. Some speed improvements were applied to Fraction in issue
22464, now the gcd() function takes up about half of the instantiation time in
the benchmark in issue
Stefan Behnel added the comment:
I created issue 22486 about the gcd() performance. I think we can close this
ticket - I don't see any more obvious low hanging fruit and future findings can
have their own ticket.
Out of interest, I modified the fractions module to compile Fraction into an
New submission from Ryan McCampbell:
Is there a reason register() doesn't check for abstract methods, like
subclassing does? Would it fail for some builtin classes? It seems that this
would be a better guarantee that, say, something really is iterable when you
check
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
