[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-11 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Thanks for the review. Committed as r88401. -- resolution: -> accepted status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-07 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: I'm sure Martin has now carefully checked all the remaining slots and these three are the last ones to be added :) -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > My understanding is that Martin can add, but not subtract. Martin, > is that correct? Correct (see the elaboration I just sent). > At this point, I'm not sure we know that the > limited API is sufficient. It's certainly not possible to easily port /all/ e

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > No, the point of the proposal is to allow you to make further changes in > response to user feedback. I assume you can't add things anymore once > the ABI is declared "stable". Can you? Adding things would be possible, although undesirable. Extension modules

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: My understanding is that Martin can add, but not subtract. Martin, is that correct? At this point, I'm not sure we know that the limited API is sufficient. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > Given the recent multiple additions of "forgotten things" in the ABI, > > wouldn't it be better to mark the ABI experimental so that things can > > get ironed out in 3.2.1? (especially with user feedback after the > > release) > > I don't know what would be

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > Given the recent multiple additions of "forgotten things" in the ABI, > wouldn't it be better to mark the ABI experimental so that things can > get ironed out in 3.2.1? (especially with user feedback after the > release) I don't know what would be gained in

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Given the recent multiple additions of "forgotten things" in the ABI, wouldn't it be better to mark the ABI experimental so that things can get ironed out in 3.2.1? (especially with user feedback after the release) -- nosy: +pitrou __

[issue11134] Add missing type slots

2011-02-06 Thread Martin v . Löwis
New submission from Martin v. Löwis : Three slots in type objects are missing in PEP 384. This patch adds them to the ABI. -- files: typeslots.diff keywords: patch messages: 128075 nosy: georg.brandl, loewis priority: release blocker severity: normal status: open title: Add missing type