[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

STINNER Victor added the comment: I read asyncore.patch: it is close to the selectors module, so it means duplicated efforts. I prefer to close this issuse since asyncore has been deprecated in favor of asyncio (and selectors). Using the selectors module in asyncore would not be efficient beca

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

STINNER Victor added the comment: Since Python 3.4 has asyncio which supports all selectors provided by the new selectors module (which includes kqueue, but also devpoll since Python 3.5), I propose to close this issue as wontfix since there is no activity since 4 years. -- nosy: +hayp

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by Марк Коренберг : -- nosy: +mmarkk ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Forgot to add the patch. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16994/asyncore.patch ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +exarkun ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pyt

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: The patch in attachment implements support for epoll() and kqueue() by adding a new "poller" argument to asyncore.loop(). However, I had a chat with Jean Paul Calderone today which pointed out how useless this is. =) The problem is basically how asyncore.l

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by Brian Curtin : -- versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by lasizoillo : -- nosy: +lasizoillo ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: I have a patch for adding epoll() support which is almost ready (asyncore supports poll(), not epoll()), it's just a matter of writing tests. kqueue() shouldn't be too difficult to implement considering that we can take Twisted as example. ...But aside fro

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- assignee: -> josiahcarlson nosy: +josiahcarlson priority: -> normal stage: -> needs patch ___ Python tracker ___

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:/

[issue6692] asyncore kqueue support

New submission from Andrew Azarov : Is there a possibility of such feature in the future releases of Python? Currently I see only select and epoll available, but on FreeBSD 7.2 with a lot of connections asyncore (1600+ active HTTP connections) has problems (not giving complete response) with epol