On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:35 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> There are other builders that are stable and should be added to the
>> stable builders list.
>
> Do you have ones you'd like to nominate?
AMD64 Debian Root, which I host, has been fairly consistently green.
Should that be declared stable?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> +angelico-debian-amd64 - all green
Just FYI, I'm currently experiencing a partial network outage, which
is impacting my ability to connect to the build farm. So these guys
are probably all offline at the moment; they should be up again within
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:12 PM Andrew Barnert via Python-Dev
> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2016, at 10:44, MRAB wrote:
>> >
>> > Is this something that we need to worry about?
>> >
>> > Extremely severe bug leaves dizzying number of softwa
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> Maybe the problems in issue 23968 [1] could have been detected earlier
>> if the Gentoo "installed Python" buildbots setup by Zachary had been
>> on the stable list.
>
> I had planned
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Zachary Ware
>> wrote:
>>> I had planned a few months ago to completely rework the stable set,
>>> but that hasn'
BUILDSLAVE:info/admin)
> was 'Chris Angelico
> '.
Excellent, glad these are working. And I hadn't noticed that it had
gone down, so this was very much useful. Thank you to whoever got that
online.
ChrisA
___
Python-Buildbo
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> We'll also take this opportunity to ensure that all of our buildslaves
> have Git installed in preparation for the GitHub switchover. Please
> note whether Git is installed on your slave(s) in your reply.
Wasn't previously, but it is now.
Ch
BUILDSLAVE:info/admin)
> was 'Chris Angelico
> '.
I didn't see anything fall over on my end. Was this disconnect related
to the hg->git changeover, and if not, is there something I should
check?
ChrisA
___
Python-Buil
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 9:51 AM, David Bolen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I didn't see anything fall over on my end. Was this disconnect related
>> to the hg->git changeover, and if not, is there something I should
>> check?
&g
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> Please do not send automated buildbot state transition mail to _this_
> list. Leave this low traffic list to communication from humans about
> buildbots and infrastructure (the purpose as I understand it).
Agreed. Maybe a new list "build
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So my question is: are any of our current buildbots running
> sufficiently recent Linux distros that they actually have this header?
Root AMD64 "Bruce" doesn't currently (Debian Jessie), but the latest
stable of Debian (Stretch) should includ
Just came across a weird problem. Not sure if it's something to raise
here or elsewhere.
My buildslave got aborted due to a host reboot, but after resetting
everything, I was unable to run "buildslave restart" as I normally
did. It crashed out with 'invalid literal for int() with base 10'
trying t
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> RHEL 7 (the *current* release), Debian Jessie (oldstable) and Ubuntu 14.04
> (old LTS supported in "maintenance" mode until early 2019 -
> https://www.ubuntu.com/info/release-end-of-life) all shipped with 1.0.1
> based OpenSSL. :(
>
> IMNSH
The direct links to partial waterfalls (eg
http://buildbot.python.org/stable/ for the "Stable" set) are no longer
active. Is there a way to look up a specific subset of builders to
check status?
Specific use-case: I just reset my buildbot host, and after doing so,
I always like to check that it's
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Zachary Ware migrated the buildbot server to 0.9 last weekend. It
> changes a *lot* of things. It will need a few days (or weeks?) to
> adapt our workflow and habits to the new version. Our buildbot
> configuratioin can maybe be also
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Victor Stinner
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Zachary Ware migrated the buildbot server to 0.9 last weekend. It
&
I just noticed by chance that my build slave was down. Not sure how
long it had been down for, but it would have been several days, maybe
a week or more. There used to be automated emails whenever contact was
lost; did those disappear with the buildbot version changes?
ChrisA
admin of the Debian R
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:00 PM Xin, Peixing wrote:
>
> Hi, Ware:
>
> Is public network IP required for the buildbot worker? Currently I am putting
> it inside my company's local network. Do I need to move it outside to expose
> it on the Internet directly?
>
Shouldn't be. Mine is a VM that's n
Turns out that this isn't a massive queue of builds happening, but
just one single build.
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/211/builds/46
The builder is saturating one CPU core and has been doing so for
literally days. I don't think it's going to get anywhere at this
point. Is there a wa
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:49 AM David Bolen wrote:
>
> If you're signed in with your github.com account, then on the buildbot web
> interface you should be able to stop the build as builder owner (if your
> github.com account matches the worker information and is in the python
> group - or someth
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:01 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> It is the first for a very long time that I see a buildbot stuck in a
> loop and don't produce any output. The main test runner process should
> write the progress every 30 seconds. But here the job ran for 3 days.
> Maybe it is a regressio
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:07 PM Jerry Miller via Python-Buildbots
wrote:
>
> I want to scrape bonus codes automatically from multiple websites and build
> website like this https://www.casinoslots.co.nz/bonus/codes it's complicated?
>
I can kinda understand that you'd post something like this t
Just upgraded the Debian Root buildbot from Jessie to Bullseye, and
now the buildbot won't start. The log is somewhat unhelpful, saying
only that there's unexpected content in buildbot.tac. Can someone
provide a copy of a current buildbot.tac please, obviously with the
password censored, which I co
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:50 AM David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 1:42 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> > Just upgraded the Debian Root buildbot from Jessie to Bullseye, and
> > now the buildbot won't start. The log is somewhat unhelpful, saying
>
My buildbot has gone offline and when I try to start it, it times out
after ten seconds. According to twistd.log,it just gets as far as
"Starting factory", then sits there silently for ten seconds, then
gets SIGTERM'd from the initializer. Prior to my attempted restart, it
was stuck in its own reco
With no-GIL builds becoming more important, is there need of a second
AMD64 Debian root buildbot to cover this configuration? I'm happy to
host a second bot VM on the same system as the existing
angelico-debian-amd64 builder. It can be given identical resources to
the existing one (as of today, tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
