Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 09, 2017, at 02:30 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >If it isn't already in the devguide (I have to admit I haven't really >read the new guide yet), once you end up pulling one of those branches >into your remotes, it will stay there until you do: > >git remote prune > >The above will delete

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 9 mars 2017 7:32 PM, "Brett Cannon" a écrit : In general I expect none of those branches to live longer than 24 hours as the PRs they were created for should be merged in less than an hour. If a branch is older than a day then it means someone probably forgot to delete the branch after merging

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 10 March 2017 at 04:32, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner >> wrote: >> >> Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? >> >> >> Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from usin

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:32:13 +, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner wrote: > > > > Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? > > > > > > Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches f

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? > > > Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from using the online > editor for minor fixups (GitHub doesn't give you t

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner wrote: > Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? > Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from using the online editor for minor fixups (GitHub doesn't give you the option to put those in your fork if you have merge acce

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Victor Stinner
Oh, in fact they are other branches (I ignored 2x and 3.x branches): remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/benjamin-binary-test-data remotes/origin/benjamin-locale-aliases remotes/origin/benjamin-reinit-tls remotes/origin/benjamin-wcsxfrm-error remotes/origin/berkerpeksag

[python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

2017-03-09 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Updating my local copy of CPython Git repository created a new ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch. Was it deliberate? If not, should we prevent the creation of new Git branches? Maybe restrict this feature outside releases? Or restrict the feature to release managers? Just to prevent mistakes. Vi