[python-committers] Is there a closed list for Python committers?

2020-12-28 Thread Jack Jansen
last thread there is from 18 months ago (and was about the fact that it may be viewable to people outside the core devs:-). Any suggestions where I can take my question? -- Jack Jansen, , http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Em

[python-committers] Re: Notification of a three-month ban from Python core development

2020-07-24 Thread Jack Jansen
be, especially given Pythons humorous history - we all try to refrain from joking replies? -- Jack Jansen, , http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman ___ python-committers ma

Re: [python-committers] Reminder of BDFL succession timeline + CFP

2018-08-03 Thread Jack Jansen
> On Aug 3, 2018, at 02:19, Yury Selivanov wrote: > > OTOH, it would be great if we can at least set a date to start the > discussion so that everybody can plan for it and join. That's the > only way to keep the discussion open and equally accessible for > everyone. If we do nothing, then natu

Re: [python-committers] List of all core developers

2018-08-02 Thread Jack Jansen
> On Aug 1, 2018, at 23:37, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > >> Le 01/08/2018 à 23:31, Jack Diederich a écrit : >> https://hg.python.org/committers.txt > > Probably outdated, for example Pablo Salingo Salgado doesn't seem there. And historically incomplete: I seem to be missing from that list, ev

Re: [python-committers] Reminder of BDFL succession timeline + CFP

2018-08-02 Thread Jack Jansen
Nathaniel, you strike the nail on the head here. The reason Guido as BDFL and therefore ultimate authority on what “python” is worked because it is organic: it is not set down in strict rules and regulations and timelines and percentages of votes and what not. It works because a very large frac

Re: [python-committers] An alternative governance model

2018-07-18 Thread Jack Jansen
eah, if the Vatican is fine with two thirds, it sounds like we could, > too. By the way, if we're already studying Polish parliamentary rules, 2/3 > agreement is needed to make constitution changes. > > - Ł > _______ > python-committers

Re: [python-committers] Transfer of power

2018-07-17 Thread Jack Jansen
see a >> "Save your breath. That's not going to happen." from Guido to end a >> distracting alternative (sub)proposal persistently promoted by one (or a >> few) very active and/or loquacious posters. > [Jack Jansen] > >> This is a very good point. A

Re: [python-committers] Transfer of power

2018-07-16 Thread Jack Jansen
annot be formally encoded. And actually I wonder whether this role could be fulfilled by any person/committee/procedure other than Guido himself. Which means that in future we should prepare for doing without this role. Which will lead to more contentious issues being put in front of the whatever-bo

Re: [python-committers] Transfer of power

2018-07-13 Thread Jack Jansen
decisions, but that may be a good thing... -- Jack Jansen, , http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.o

Re: [python-committers] Changing commiter status (was: Missing In Action)

2018-06-18 Thread Jack Jansen
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > <https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/> > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>) > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-

Re: [python-committers] Missing In Action

2018-06-17 Thread Jack Jansen
t > inactive developers are dead :-) I'm quite sure that there is life > after Python. Right? > > Victor > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers