On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 7:45 AM Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:
> If there are people in the community who wish to provide support for
> these platforms, I don't see a reason not to keep them in a tier 4.
> Such platforms would not be supported by the core team and don't
> necessarily need a buildbot (e
Hi all,
Just a quick note to mention that Dennis Sweeney (CC'd) has been added
to the Python Triage team:
https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/412. Dennis has
already been responding to new issues, and the newly added permissions
will enable better responses and corrections to issue/PR
Hi all,
Pablo and I have started a poll to promote Ammar Askar as a core
developer. Further details and the poll can be found here:
https://discuss.python.org/t/vote-to-promote-ammar-askar/9779
Thanks!
Zach
___
python-committers mailing list -- python
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 2:27 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> One of the bpo admins should delete bpo user skoolbeep/Spammer 'Spammer'
> is the 'real name'!
> https://bugs.python.org/user?username=skoolbeep&realname=&github=&%40action=search
> see https://bugs.python.org/issue44550
I'm the one who set th
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:58 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Any update on this issue? Nobody recalls what code and service sends a
> comment to bugs.python.org when a commit is merged?
I might have found it; I at least opened
https://github.com/psf/bpo-roundup/pull/1 against what I found :)
___
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 9:23 AM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> (Could it have to do with the master->main move?)
I think this is likely; we do still get messages from backport PRs.
I'm not sure what service is actually creating the messages, though.
--
Zach
__
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:36 AM Victor Stinner wrote:
> I'm getting more and more email notifications when a commit contains
> my GitHub handle ("@vstinner"). For example: "Automerge-Triggered-By:
> @vstinner".
Yes, this is a pretty substantial failing of GitHub for popular projects :(
> But the
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:29 PM Steve Dower wrote:
> While most of the tooling necessary for working on CPython is freely
> available (as Visual Studio Community), this will also include OS images
> and Azure credits.
For reference, the Azure credit has been enough to me to run a Windows
8.1 bui
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see a high activity on pull requests on the CPython project, likely
> because of the CPython sprint. Sadly, the AppVeyor is still slow and
> still has only 2 jobs in parallel.
>
> Would it be possible to make the AppVeyor job non-man
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:20 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> Assuming I didn't mess anything up, Abhilash is now set up!
Welcome, Abhilash!
___
python-committers mailing list -- python-committers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-committers-le..
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 6:10 AM Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Welcome aboard, Stephane! :)
--
Zach
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: h
On the recommendation of Ammar Askar and with Serhiy's endorsement on
Zulip [0], I've given Karthikeyan Singaravelan (CC'd) triage
privileges on bugs.python.org.
Karthikeyan, please use your new-found powers for good, and don't
hesitate to ask for guidance if you need it. Keep up the good work,
a
Hi all,
Most of my effort this week has gone into improving the state of
buildbot.python.org, which has largely gone into improving Buildbot
itself. Here are the relevant highlights:
- Anyone can now log into buildbot.python.org via GitHub by clicking
the 'Anonymous' dropdown in the upper right
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> At the developer sprints this week, we collectively decided to grant core
> committer status to Emily and Lisa.
Congratulations and welcome, Emily and Lisa!
--
Zach
___
python-committers mai
+1
--
Zach
(On a phone)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 21:54 Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 07:36 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> > [tl;dr: We need some ground rules, because uncertainty makes it hard
> > to think straight. But if we get sucked into a complicated meta-debate
> > about the ground rul
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Pablo Galindo Salgado
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi Pablo, welcome, and congratulations!
> I will do so with extra care so nobody will be disappointed for this
> decision.
Because you're human, you're going to screw something up at some
point, just as each of us has
Hi Terry,
I have an email going out to AppVeyor with you CCed, we'll see what
kind of response we get (probably tomorrow). In the meantime, I'll
look into disabling largefile tests, or test_mmap specifically on
AppVeyor to see whether that helps the situation.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Ter
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I can restart a test on just Travis when AppVeyor (and now MSTS) all passed.
> But for the last few hours, test_async has failed 1/4 to 1/3 of the runs.
> This means that test_async failed twice, so I suspect that it actually fails
> about half
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Occasionally I receive a sequence of emails from GitHub where a PR is
> requesting my review by some user, the-knights-who-say-ni responds with a
> CLA request, and then Bedevere closes it, without comment. Latest example:
> https://github
We already have Travis checking 'make regen-all' and 'make clinic'
(assuming it's working correctly).
--
Zach
(On a phone)
On Feb 4, 2018 9:09 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
On 4 February 2018 at 00:54, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2018, at 20:40, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
>>
>> Sure, I sort of as
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I have removed your access on GitHub and unsubscribed you from
> python-committers.
Also flipped the 'is_committer' bit to off on the bug tracker.
> Sorry to see you go, Xavier, but look forward to
> continuing to work with you on PRs!
Com
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems AppVevor builds (and generally Windows builds) have been broken
> for some time with a failure in test_distutils:
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.7.0a0.9471#L2040
>
> ==
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 7 December 2017 at 10:48, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Promoting Julien is part of my global idea/project of trying to
>> recognize more contributions which are not strictly code, but as
>> useful or even more useful than code! Python documenta
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> Thank you Mariatta, Ethan, Eric, Guido, and everyone!
> I am overwhelmed by all the positive comments!
>
> I am so glad to be the part of the team and looking forward to make more
> contributions.
> (Will start right now form polishing PEP 5
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of review requests from github, asking for reviews
> from the Windows team. Many of the PRs don't as far as I can see have
> much Windows-specific about them. It doesn't bother me too much (I
> just ignore ones I don't have anyth
Being added to the team caused me to be 'watching' the repo again, even
though I'd previously 'unwatched'. Paul, you may need to unwatch again as
well.
--
Zach
(On a phone)
On Aug 20, 2017 09:28, "Steve Dower" wrote:
> We created a Windows team on github and signed it up for notifications of
>
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Zachary Ware explained me once that "make regen-all" should be run
> after "make", but I don't recall why :-)
The real kicker is `make clinic`, which fails unless done after `make
all`. I'd be all
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I set up the account and Zach has access. If you have instructions to point
> me at, Paul, I can see if I can set it up.
Looks like https://ci.appveyor.com/gitHubTeams while logged in as 'python'.
That looks like the right place to make the
+1
--
Zach
(On a phone)
On Jun 13, 2017 02:17, "Victor Stinner" wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to give the commit bit to Julien Palards on the
following project (only on this project)?
https://github.com/python/docsbuild-scripts/pulls
His GitHub account is "JulienPalard":
https://githu
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Mariatta Wijaya
wrote:
> and will it work with VirtualBox on mac?
Yes, very well :). That (and Azure, to which you get a monthly credit
with MSDN subscription) is the only way I've been able to run Windows
for some time now.
--
Zach
___
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Zachary Ware
wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It looks like appveyor tests are currently failing on all builds (something
>> about UNC paths + imports). Was appveyor enabled recently,
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like appveyor tests are currently failing on all builds (something
> about UNC paths + imports). Was appveyor enabled recently, or did the test
> regress?
AppVeyor has been enabled for some time, but is not (yet) required.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 25/05/2017 à 15:06, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> On 25 May 2017 at 18:01, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> Did someone manage to make this work? Can they post the entire
>>> instructions they used? (including local branch setup)
>>
>> The minim
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> While at the PyCon US sprints the idea came up of offering Carol Willing
> developer privileges. Everyone at the table -- about 6 of us -- liked the
> idea and Carol also said she would happy to become a core dev, so I'm
> officially putting
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Requiring Travis to pass (I really don't want to turn this off as we already
> had a broken build when I temporarily turned it off at someone's request
> when Travis was backed up from the AWS S3 outage; I also don't plan to make
> AppVeyor re
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm wondering if I've broken something at my end, or if everyone is
> seeing the same error.
Works fine for me. Have you rebuilt since pulling? If a simple
'make' doesn't do it for you, try an hg purge before redoing configure
and make.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> I propose to promote Xavier de Gaye as a Python core developer.
I've had a few interactions with Xavier, all of which were positive.
+1 from me.
--
Zach
___
python-committers mailing list
python
On Mar 6, 2016 10:55 PM, "Brett Cannon" wrote:
>
> I just finished doing what was necessary to make Davin a core dev, so
let's welcome our first new core dev of 2016!
Welcome, Davin!
--
Zach
(On a phone)
___
python-committers mailing list
python-commit
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> [...] the maintenance issue we have with ctypes (or at least that's
> my hang-up with it). I think we still have not figured out what code we have
> patched and so no one has been willing to update to a newer version of
> libffi. I think Zacha
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> After sending my new SSH key I have recovered "push" abilities in the
> mercurial repository, but it looks like I am not present in the bug
> tracker "assigned to" field.
I see you in 'assigned to', as 'jcea'. Your own username is always at
the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:11:15 +0200, Serhiy Storchaka
> wrote:
>> On 23.11.15 18:00, R. David Murray wrote:
>> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 00:58:01 -0600, Zachary Ware
>> > wrote:
>> > I haven't
Hi,
Inspired by a couple of issues about testing installed Python that
popped up this morning (#25694 and #25696), I've set up a new set of
builders[1] to build, install, and test the installed Python. They
run on the same slave that runs my "x86 Gentoo Non-Debug with X"
builders.
If you are int
Hi folks,
Just wanted to let you know in case you hadn't seen them that there
are a couple of new buildbots in service: one that builds on Windows
in Release configuration [1] and one that builds the documentation and
runs a couple of style checks on it [2]. Both are currently in the
'unstable' s
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> On 05/25/2015 02:03 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> Perhaps needed version bump in the default branch? I think now Misc/NEWS
> will have two modifiable sections - for 3.5 (bugfixes) and for 3.6 (new
> features).
>
>
> That's a good point!
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Paul has been participating on python-dev for quite a while, he is a
> committer on pip, and (co-)author on 5 PEPs. At this point I think it would
> be prudent for Paul to have commit privileges if for any other reason than
> to help manage th
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> For at least 24 hours now my attempts to connect to hg.python.org have been
> futile.
>
> I finally stuck to it this time, and about three minutes later finally got
> the prompt, but after entering my password got a
>
> remote: Connection
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:15 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:58:50 +0200, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>> Someone broke test_pydoc. Example:
>> http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20FreeBSD%2010.0%203.4/builds/481/steps/test/logs/stdio
>>
> I couldn't reproduce this, no
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 6/15/2014 8:21 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we give Berker Peksag push privileges. He's
>> provided a number of good quality patches and done good review work on
>> other issues, and has been an active contributor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:16 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 17.03.14 14:52, schrieb Jesus Cea:
>> Do I need to do anything to create the 3.4 branch in the buildbots?.
>
> As a slave operator, you don't need to do anything. As the master
> operator, you would have to edit the configuration file
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 13.02.2014 14:15, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> So how is the RC phase supposed to work this time? Usually only critical
>> patches get in, but I see a lot of commits in the last few days.
>
> For 3.3.0 bugfixing continued on d
Hi all,
Just got this output from pushing a commit:
"""
pushing to ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
searching for changes
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
remote: buildbot: change(s) NOT sent, somet
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another quick infrastructure question (is this the right list, btw?):
Core-mentorship is another good candidate.
> I don't see 'review' links for some patches. Like in issue #14911,
> Kristján uploaded two patches, same day, alm
Welcome, Yury!
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As with previous years we will be having a Language Summit at PyCon North
> America, in Montreal. The summit will be on Wednesday 9th April and running
> from approximately 10am to 4pm.
>
> As Python committers you're invited,
Hi all,
Just wanted to briefly say thank you for the vote of confidence in
accepting me into your ranks. I'm looking forward to working with
such a great group of people on such a great project for a long time
to come!
Thanks,
Zach Ware
___
python-com
55 matches
Mail list logo
