Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-19 Thread Victor Stinner
Le sam. 20 oct. 2018 à 01:58, Larry Hastings a écrit : > I'll also admit I've been dragging my feet about setting up > yet-another-online-account for yet-another-form-of-online-communication. > (But this time! It'll solve all our problems! Finally, our conversational > deliverance is at hand

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-19 Thread Larry Hastings
On 10/12/2018 11:55 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 01:30, Antoine Pitrou > wrote: What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-17 Thread Stefan Krah
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:30:33PM +0100, Łukasz Langa wrote: > > I find the presentation of threaded conversations in linear format to be > > confusing, figuring out what I have and have not read to be difficult, and > > the overall frustration to not be worth it. > > Are there any linear-forma

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-17 Thread Victor Stinner
Le mer. 17 oct. 2018 à 03:56, Ethan Furman a écrit : > I also supported the trial of Discourse. > > However, now that I have tried it, it will be a no from me. I find the > presentation of threaded conversations in linear format to be confusing, > figuring out what I have and have not read to be

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-17 Thread Łukasz Langa
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 02:56, Ethan Furman wrote: > > I find the presentation of threaded conversations in linear format to be > confusing, figuring out what I have and have not read to be difficult, and > the overall frustration to not be worth it. Are there any linear-formatted communication

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-16 Thread Ethan Furman
On 10/15/2018 09:22 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > Brett is exactly right about me. I'm following along on Discourse and > this mailing list when I have the time. I plan to read the governance > PEPs and vote when the time comes. But, I don't have anything useful > to say. > > At the sprint, I ve

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-16 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le 16/10/2018 à 06:22, Benjamin Peterson a écrit : > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, at 11:55, Brett Cannon wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 01:30, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >>> >>> What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent >>> developers who are not even registered (*) on

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-15 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, at 11:55, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 01:30, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > > What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent > > developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For > > example Benjamin Peterson, Lar

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
Brett Cannon writes: > One data point in all of this is Victor's PEP 8015. Here on the mailing > list I seem to be the first and only person to reply since the PEP was > posted on Monday. But over on Discourse there have been 3 people who have > replied and there's already been some back-and-fort

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-12 Thread Stefan Krah
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:55:32AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: > I will also note that Benjamin, Larry, and Raymond can be a bit quiet at > times and so they may not have signed up yet because they have not had > anything to say to compel them to create accounts (Stefan has already > stated he doesn

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 01:30, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent > developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For > example Benjamin Peterson, Larry Hastings, Raymond Hettinger, Stefan > Krah, Terry Reedy. > I b

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-12 Thread Brett Cannon
One data point in all of this is Victor's PEP 8015. Here on the mailing list I seem to be the first and only person to reply since the PEP was posted on Monday. But over on Discourse there have been 3 people who have replied and there's already been some back-and-forth. So with a sample size of on

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-12 Thread Łukasz Langa
> On 12 Oct 2018, at 00:38, Terry Reedy wrote: > > On 10/11/2018 4:30 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent >> developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For >> example Benjamin Peterson, Larry Hastings, Raymond

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-11 Thread Terry Reedy
On 10/11/2018 4:30 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For example Benjamin Peterson, Larry Hastings, Raymond Hettinger, Stefan Krah, Terry Reedy. This provoked me to

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-11 Thread Victor Stinner
Le jeu. 11 oct. 2018 à 10:30, Antoine Pitrou a écrit : > What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent > developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For > example Benjamin Peterson, Larry Hastings, Raymond Hettinger, Stefan > Krah, Terry Reedy. > > I

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-11 Thread Antoine Pitrou
What concerns me is that there are several long-time and/or prominent developers who are not even registered (*) on discuss.python.org. For example Benjamin Peterson, Larry Hastings, Raymond Hettinger, Stefan Krah, Terry Reedy. I would be worried if a decision is taken without them. (*) https:/

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-10 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Jack Diederich wrote: > I'm worried about the new format combined with governance discussions. As > best I can tell 51 CPython committers have signed up for an account [I > think that is a big number, btw] but only 17 have posted anything; That 17 > is about 5 more

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-10 Thread Stefan Krah
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 11:20:08PM -0400, Jack Diederich wrote: > I don't think it was deliberate, but it looks like the new format is > actively discouraging everyone but those most deeply invested with the most > free time from participating. I'm actively discouraged by various visual effects on

Re: [python-committers] discuss.python.org participation

2018-10-09 Thread Fred Drake
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:25 PM Jack Diederich wrote: > I'm worried about the new format combined with governance discussions. > As best I can tell 51 CPython committers have signed up for an account > [I think that is a big number, btw] but only 17 have posted anything; That > 17 is about 5 more