W dniu 2011-01-29 06:15, Steve Holden pisze:
If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd
no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence.
Me too, but I did want to acknowledge the correctness of Antoine's argument.
Yes, I reminded people (using multiprocessing as
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 11:16 +0100, Łukasz Langa a écrit :
> W dniu 2011-01-29 06:15, Steve Holden pisze:
> >> If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd
> >> no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence.
> > Me too, but I did want to acknowledge the correctn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Both you (i.e. your earlier you) and Antoine are somewhat correct. The
mailbox module *is* broken, and such large patches *shouldn't* go in
during rc phase.
However, I don't think people are "playing games" with the release
process. No core develope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.01.2011 11:16, schrieb Łukasz Langa:
> W dniu 2011-01-29 06:15, Steve Holden pisze:
>>> If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd
>>> no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence.
>> Me too, but I did want to a
W dniu 2011-01-29 11:25, Georg Brandl pisze:
Gentlemen. It was disappointing to see serious ideas about pushing
feature commits after the beta (and even during the RC phase) or
sneaking in controversial changes in respect to the moratorium. All
these risky suggestions came from the fact that we a
Steve Holden wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2011, at 12:04 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
>> If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd
>> no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence.
Why not add a deprecation warning to the module and point users to a
version on PyPI wh
Georg Brandl python.org> writes:
> About quality: It is a big fail to do a release and include a note "but
> hey, this module does not work, because our developers did not commit a
> working patch soon enough" (of course you would omit the second part,
> but you would probably include a link to t
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 12:24 +, Vinay Sajip a écrit :
> >
> > So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go
> > in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the
> > testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we will fix them and put in
> > anoth
2011/1/29 Łukasz Langa :
> We could do that by shortening the release cycle from now on. How about
> that?
The long-term fix is actually the ongoing effort to split the standard
library off from the core language implementation. A faster release
cycle is reasonably appropriate for the former, but
2011/1/29 Nick Coghlan :
> 2011/1/29 Łukasz Langa :
>> PS. Please, let's release 3.2 as it is.
>
> Agreed.
Although I can accept Georg's reasoning on the topic as well.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia
Dnia 29-01-2011 o godz. 14:00 Nick Coghlan napisał(a):
> 2011/1/29 Nick Coghlan :
>> 2011/1/29 Łukasz Langa :
>>> PS. Please, let's release 3.2 as it is.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Although I can accept Georg's reasoning on the topic as well.
>
Me too. Practicality beats purity once again:-)
--
Łuka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.01.2011 13:52, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 12:24 +, Vinay Sajip a écrit :
>>>
>>> So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go
>>> in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And s
On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go
>in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the
>testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we will fix them and put in
>another rc.
I completely agree.
On Jan 29, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>> So my "pronouncement" here is: if reviewed properly, the patch will go
>> in 3.2rc2. If this needs a few more days, so be it. And should the
>> testing after 3.2rc2 reveal deficiencies, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.01.2011 20:55, schrieb Raymond Hettinger:
> P.S. Even though it's late in the release cycle, I think we should be
> thrilled at the quality and intensity of efforts to fixup mailbox and the
> OS X issues. If these guys (Ned, Ronald, David, Ste
15 matches
Mail list logo
