Hi,
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
> Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be
> compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its own set of issues.
>
> That all said; again, the likelihood of short term alteration of the CLA is
> a non st
On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>>
>> Precisely. None of us are lawyers; the CLA was made by lawyers to be
>> compatible with the Python license "stack" which has its own set of issues.
>>
>> That all said; again
See: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig
Open archives. As the header says this is for the discussion of CLA/other
issues. If specific legal questions or alterations to Python/the PSF
trademarks, CLA/etc are requested those *must* be sent to p...@python.org for
board overs
