Hello all,
Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer. At
this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two dozen
or more accepted patches.
She is still green but is persistent, conscientious, and learning fast. She is
more willing than mos
Hi,
I vote +1 for Mariatta Wijaya.
2017-01-26 9:04 GMT+01:00 Raymond Hettinger :
> Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer. At
> this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two
> dozen or more accepted patches.
Oh, I didn't notice her
2017-01-26 10:04 GMT+02:00 Raymond Hettinger :
> Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer. At
> this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two
> dozen or more accepted patches.
>
> She is still green but is persistent, conscientious, and l
+1
https://github.com/python/cpython/search?p=1&q=Mariatta&type=Commits&utf8=%E2%9C%93
Her English is definitely better than me :)
And I feel it's easy to read for non native speaker.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer. At
> this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two
> dozen or more accepted patches.
>
> She is still green but is pers
On 25 January 2017 at 10:19, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Perhaps making the last minor version to a major release version
> as we did with 2.7 is a good approach, i.e. we'd switch the
> major number when cutting an LTS release and follow similar
> guidelines as we have for 2.7 for this 3.x LTS release.
On 25 January 2017 at 15:29, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I also believe that the PSF should start stepping up and
> invest some money into helping with Python support. A lot
> of money is being spent on community work, but hardly any
> on development work at the moment.
Software maintenance is a comme
On 25 January 2017 at 19:28, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On 2017-01-25, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
>> I think this is the next frontier for Python maintenance; we need
>> full-time core maintainers, no third parties are funding any such
>> developers, and the PSF doesn't seem interested in pursuing that.
On 26 January 2017 at 10:17, Berker Peksağ wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
>> I volunteer to continue to provide mentorship and assistance to her as
>> needed after she is granted commit rights.
>
> I'd like to see some triaging, code review and more work on
On Jan 26, 2017, at 02:49 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>With Raymond volunteering as mentor, I think an approach where changes
>are still reviewed, but it's Mariatta that does the final commit would
>work.
+1
-Barry
___
python-committers mailing list
pytho
2017-01-26 14:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Coghlan :
> With Raymond volunteering as mentor, I think an approach where changes
> are still reviewed, but it's Mariatta that does the final commit would
> work.
>
> That would be pretty similar to the way things worked when I
> recommended Yury for commit privileg
On 26.01.2017 16:52, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2017-01-26 14:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Coghlan :
>> With Raymond volunteering as mentor, I think an approach where changes
>> are still reviewed, but it's Mariatta that does the final commit would
>> work.
>>
>> That would be pretty similar to the way things wo
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Software maintenance is a commercial support activity that is normally
> done for profit, so the PSF needs to be careful in how it approaches
> it to avoid getting in trouble with the IRS (public interest charities
> like the PSF opera
On 2017-01-26 14:49, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With Raymond volunteering as mentor, I think an approach where changes
> are still reviewed, but it's Mariatta that does the final commit would
> work.
+1
I followed some of Mariatta's work. She does a good job. I trust both
her and Raymond's judgement t
I cast a + 1 vote too.
Positives I imagine are:
* Her motivation to contribute.
* She addresses feedback provided on patches and follows up.
* Raymond's mentorship.
It will be better, if in near future
* She identifies a focus area and becomes an expert in that.
Thanks,
Senthil
On Thu, Jan
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> That would be pretty similar to the way things worked when I
> recommended Yury for commit privileges - at the start, the only thing
> that changed was that the final step in the review process changed
> from "wait until I find time to commit
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 at 00:05 Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer.
> At this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two
> dozen or more accepted patches.
>
> She is still green but is persistent,
On 26.01.2017 17:34, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Software maintenance is a commercial support activity that is normally
>> done for profit, so the PSF needs to be careful in how it approaches
>> it to avoid getting in trouble with the IRS
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:26 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 at 00:05 Raymond Hettinger
> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Mariatta Wijaya has been working hard to become a Python core developer. At
> this point she has worked with several of us and I think she has had two
> dozen or
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> Thanks Brett. It looks like +1 all around.
Yes. It seems Berker preferred to wait a bit. I hope, he is okay with
the decision as he has reviewed + worked with Mariatta quite a bit.
--
Senthil
_
20 matches
Mail list logo
