Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-12 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:00:07PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > Anybody got FreeBSD? I'm getting this. This is an old and possibly > misconfigured system, so the problem could be on my end. > > FreeBSD 4.9 > apache 2.0.53 (from ports) > python 2.3.3 ... > -I/home/grisha/src/tmp/mod

Re: FeeBSD build (was mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing)

2005-09-08 Thread Jim Gallacher
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I don't have FreeBSD, or any experience with any BSD, but I won't let that stop me from commenting. :) I don't see apr-0 listed in your includes in the above output. APR_THREAD_MUTEX_UNNESTED is defined in apr_thread

Re: FeeBSD build (was mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing)

2005-09-08 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: I don't have FreeBSD, or any experience with any BSD, but I won't let that stop me from commenting. :) I don't see apr-0 listed in your includes in the above output. APR_THREAD_MUTEX_UNNESTED is defined in apr_thread_mutex.h, which on debian is in /us

Re: FeeBSD build (was mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing)

2005-09-08 Thread Jim Gallacher
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: Anybody got FreeBSD? I'm getting this. This is an old and possibly misconfigured system, so the problem could be on my end. FreeBSD 4.9 apache 2.0.53 (from ports) python 2.3.3 $ make Compiling for DSO. /usr/local/sbin/apxs -I/home/grisha/src/tmp/mod_pyth

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
Anybody got FreeBSD? I'm getting this. This is an old and possibly misconfigured system, so the problem could be on my end. FreeBSD 4.9 apache 2.0.53 (from ports) python 2.3.3 $ make Compiling for DSO. /usr/local/sbin/apxs -I/home/grisha/src/tmp/mod_python-3.2.1b/src/include -I/usr/local/i

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Ron Reisor
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: Ron Reisor wrote: Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession. Even better, you can use Session.Session() and the "PythonOption session FileSession" configu

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Jim Gallacher
Ron Reisor wrote: Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession. Even better, you can use Session.Session() and the "PythonOption session FileSession" configuration directive to get all the benefits of

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Ron Reisor
Yes! Plus, the software I'm developing is working too. I pulled out an early version of FileSession and started using Session.FileSession. Looks good. Gotta love it! thanks, Ron On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Wow, that's a nice one :). 2005/9/7, Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Jorey Bump
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the agenda for a later release (why not 3.3 ?). For the moment I don't see any quick and easy way to support both 2.0 and 2.1, from what you wrote. I'd rather we try to get 3.2 out with a proper 2.0 support,

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Jim Gallacher
+1 Linux Debian Sid apache 2.0.54 python 2.3.5 GCC 4.0.2

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Jim Gallacher
I agree with Nicolas. If we start chasing apache 2.1 alpha support we might *never* get 3.2 out the door. :-( Also, what's the roadmap for apache 2.1/2.2? Jim Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi, Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the agenda for a later release (why not 3.3

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Wow, that's a nice one :). 2005/9/7, Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 > > MacOSX 10.4.2 > gcc-4.0.0 (Apple build) > Python 2.4.1 > Apache 2.0.54 > > cheers, > > Ron > > > Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3) > University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services >

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Ron Reisor
+1 MacOSX 10.4.2 gcc-4.0.0 (Apple build) Python 2.4.1 Apache 2.0.54 cheers, Ron Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3) University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716 pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Hi, Could we focus on Apache 2.0 for the 3.2 release ? Put 2.1 on the agenda for a later release (why not 3.3 ?). For the moment I don't see any quick and easy way to support both 2.0 and 2.1, from what you wrote. I'd rather we try to get 3.2 out with a proper 2.0 support, and try to fix things f

Re: mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Jorey Bump wrote: -1 Slackware Linux 10.1 Python 2.4.1 Apache 2.1.6 Alpha I don't think we mean to support 2.1.6 alpha, so this doesn't count. :-) Grisha

mod_python 3.2.1b available for testing

2005-09-07 Thread Jim Gallacher
A new mod_python 3.2 beta tarball is now available for testing. A Windows binary for python 2.4 is also provided. Here are the rules: In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and should feel obligated