Re: Potential deadlock in psp.py

2005-06-24 Thread Jim Gallacher
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: Yeah, we've got to be inline with the HTTP Project - prefork is the default on unix systems, so we have to abide by it... So I guess the solution is that we need to reserve two locks instead of just one? It seems a shame to waste locks if they are not goi

Re: Potential deadlock in psp.py

2005-06-24 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: Yeah, we've got to be inline with the HTTP Project - prefork is the default on unix systems, so we have to abide by it... So I guess the solution is that we need to reserve two locks instead of just one? It se

Re: PythonSessionOption - a new apache directive for session configuration

2005-06-24 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Is there a way to forbid PythonSessionOption from appearing in a .htaccess file ? If not, then there is no advantage (security-wise) in having a different configuration directive. I know we've decided on using PythonOption session_* instead, but looking at http://www.apa

Re: PythonSessionOption - a new apache directive for session configuration

2005-06-24 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
I think the way to go is PythonOption now, then consider PythonSessionOption later - I too do not like too many options and am not sure that session handling is a core function. Changing it later (if we decide to) should not be a big problem - it's pretty easy to just spit our a wrning that