On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:54:27PM -0500, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> >To confirm Jim's arithmetic anyway, I say -1 on 3.2.6 as it stands.
> >
> >As to 3.2.7, I say +1, subject to removal of problematic test case
> >as already raised and with us at least confirming tests run OK
Jim Gallacher writes:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > To confirm Jim's arithmetic anyway, I say -1 on 3.2.6 as it stands.
> >
> > As to 3.2.7, I say +1, subject to removal of problematic test case
> > as already raised and with us at least confirming tests run OK for
> > version out of SVN prior to
+1 trunk rev 374588 + Apache/2.0.55 + Python/2.2.3 + Windows 2000 SP4
+1 trunk rev 374588 + Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.3.5 + Windows 2000 SP4
+1 trunk rev 374588 + Apache/2.0.55 + ActivePython/2.4.2 + Windows XP SP2
All three installers for win32 are available at
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/down
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sid), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-prefork, Python 2.3.5
If I can get just one more test from FreeBSD 5 or 6, I'll produce the
3.2.7 tarball
Jim Gallacher wrote:
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sid), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-prefork, Python 2.3.5
If I can get just one more test from FreeBSD 5 or 6, I'll prod
Barry Pederson wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sid), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.3.5
+1 trunk rev 374588 Debian (sarge), Apache 2.0.54-prefork, Python 2.3.5
If I can get just one more test from F
Jim, Nicolas
Would it make sense to change test_Session_Session_conf() function in
unit tests to something like:
def test_Session_Session_conf(self):
import tempfile
tempdir = tempfile.gettempdir()
database = os.path.join(tempdir,"mp_sess_test.dbm")
c = Virt
